SOTTREADER

The Living Force
As expected, even those going for J&J thinking it's one shot will probably soon be mandated to get a 2nd shot!


Get your second J&J dose ASAP say health experts after FDA advisory committee recommended approval of booster: Protection fell from 88% to just 3% in six months, study finds​

 

Hi_Henry

Dagobah Resident
There has been a lot of research work done around fear management (pushing people's buttons). You should have no problem finding interesting papers showing this. I, for one, doubt it is being done with the idea of helping people manage it.

One such paper I saw was related to sunscreen lotions usage. It did not mention how to effect is sales, but certainly gave plenty of hints of what could be done to do so.

The following paper was mentioned in some article dealing with fear inducement, but unfortunately I can not find the source. I suspect authors of such papers were called upon as "experts" to coach at places like "Event 201" so that globally the communication response to Plan-demic would be the same everywhere. As we can see, it was and is to this day.

Designer brands have zeroed in on these self-esteem contingencies by manufacturing patterned, colourful protective masks, so helping slow the spread makes statements about both health and fashion (Oerman & Bennett, 2020). More and more, mask-wearing is becoming an expected behaviour, exemplified by celebrities with social power (Macke, 2020), and thus more likely to be emulated. Likewise, to the extent that a worldview involving a commitment to social distancing becomes widely adopted, fraternizing with people in public may result in feelings of discomfort; in this case, individuals would avoid being in public because it is a worldview-threatening behaviour (e.g., Greenberg et al., 1995). Moreover, public engagement in positive health-facilitating behaviours by those in positions of power (especially those leaders seen as charismatic; e.g., Cohen, Solomon, Maxfield, Pyszczynski, & Greenberg, 2004) should serve to encourage shifts in social norms and subsequently, worldviews.

Recommendations for future action​

We know from cancer-prevention research utilizing the TMHM, and from the fear appeal literature, that people respond to health-based communications where thoughts of death are made conscious with behaviours aimed at reducing perceived risk and vulnerability. Therein lies an important recommendation for those working in public health in the time of a pandemic: Communications should be sufficiently threatening and provide straightforward behavioural solutions to mitigate individual risk, to decrease virus transmission on a larger scale. An effective public health communication might begin with a striking death reminder (like transmission or case fatality rates), and end with simple instructions for a behaviour proven to be effective, like washing your hands or correctly wearing PPEs (see Figure 2a). But because people are generally effective at pushing death out of consciousness, either as a result of proximal defences or desensitization, interventions aimed at proximal defences, like our hypothetical communication, are not sufficient alone.


More here,
 

Woodsman

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Germany: in the state of Hesse the authorities now allow all food stores (including supermarkets) to ban un-vaccinated people. I guess a number of food stores will not apply this ban. Time will tell.
The logic only has to make enough sense to string people along far enough so that combustion is achieved.

I'm really getting the sense that the chickens are being conveyed to the slaughter house at this point, and that the media and excuses are just soothing background music to keep the birds calm.

At some magical point, the people will know that the PTB know that the people know; that the pleasant smiles are just for show and the guns are not.

It's harvest time.

Except... at any point, if enough people were smart enough, knowledgeable enough and decided to, the whole show could be brought to an abrupt halt and we could all live happily ever after.

I begin to understand how 100 people of the right energetic level and knowledge could change the world. There's a handful of them out there, doing their level best.

Isn't there some agreement with the Universe that this process is allowed to take place only if some chickens are not prevented from hopping off the conveyor belt..?
 

itellsya

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Germany: in the state of Hesse the authorities now allow all food stores (including supermarkets) to ban un-vaccinated people. I guess a number of food stores will not apply this ban. Time will tell.

RT published the same article and included this comment:

Minister-President Volker Bouffier somewhat bafflingly told BILD he hoped the new rule wouldn't be widely implemented, explaining: "We expect that this option will only be used on some days and that businesses which cater to everyday needs will not make use of it."


To me, this looks a bit like mixed messaging, and it reminded me of a video that has been doing the rounds recently on Twitter where the Australian PM said that he would create legislation that would "protect" businesses that didn't want to enforce the vaccine pass. I thought it was curious because elsewhere in Australia they've been enforcing some pretty brutal lockdown restrictions.


It seems to me that some people and places are enforcing the draconian measures whilst at the same time, in other instances, loopholes are being created - or they're already there - that people can use to work around the mandate.

In the US, Boeing announced it's enforcing the mandate but that religious and medical exemptions are permitted. In Canada, they emphasise that religious and medical exemptions will only be allowed in an extremely limited number of cases (obviously part of the reason behind this rather uncompromising tone may just be that they're trying to scare people into getting the injection). Meanwhile for the US Navy, exemptions are not being promoted (perhaps they're allowed, but the messaging doesn't convey this, instead there's emphasis on the punishments).

It's not yet clear to me why there's this mixed messaging, if that's what it is, whether it's because some can see there's pushback and they're covering their backs just in case they need to backtrack, or whether the loopholes will always exist and it's just that some are highlighting them whilst others are concealing them under rhetoric; and maybe that's related to the person speaking, with some being gleeful authoritarians whilst others are not. It also strikes me that perhaps there's some allowance for 'free will' going on here, because forcing people to comply with anything isn't as tasty as those that give it up willingly.

My guess would be that there's some aspects of all of the above, plus different factions are in play, and the situation is just generally a mess.


On another note, it seems to me that this whole vaccine mandate situation seems to be a kind of purge, as we've seen in states that become ponerized. I guess this has been going on for a while now in other areas but the mandate seems to have accelerated it.
 

michaelrc

Jedi Council Member
FOTCM Member
The logic only has to make enough sense to string people along far enough so that combustion is achieved.

I'm really getting the sense that the chickens are being conveyed to the slaughter house at this point, and that the media and excuses are just soothing background music to keep the birds calm.

At some magical point, the people will know that the PTB know that the people know; that the pleasant smiles are just for show and the guns are not.

It's harvest time.

Except... at any point, if enough people were smart enough, knowledgeable enough and decided to, the whole show could be brought to an abrupt halt and we could all live happily ever after.

I begin to understand how 100 people of the right energetic level and knowledge could change the world. There's a handful of them out there, doing their level best.

Isn't there some agreement with the Universe that this process is allowed to take place only if some chickens are not prevented from hopping off the conveyor belt..?

 

Hi_Henry

Dagobah Resident

Hope the folks at the protest see the diagram in this post,



Better chants would be "Boycott the Media", "Don't watch the Media", "Turn Off the Media" ....
 

Michael B-C

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Steve Kirsch, who left a job in high tech in order to focus full time on vaccine safety issues (Executive Director COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund), is rather like a dog with two bones (CDC/DA) - and he wont let go of either.

His latest piece on TrialSiteNews lays bare the lie that massively increased VAERS reporting is anything else but a sign of a torrent of reactions way beyond the normal background noise - as perpetually claimed by them bones, especially the CDC.

I've attached the monster PDF he refers to near the end of this article called All you need to know About Vaccine Safety. A most comprehensive and useful tool for sending to employers who are threatening anyone with dismissal for not taking the jab along with a note saying 'I look forward with great interest to hearing your responses to the attached and your willingness to take on full liability having received this information should I suffer any form of life impairing adverse reaction as documented here and as a result of your seeking to enforce an unlawful medical mandate with regard to my employment status'. You may find a long silence ensue...


Proof that the CDC is lying to the world about COVID vaccine safety

SteveKirsch October 15, 2021


The CDC and the FDA claim that we can safely ignore the huge spike in event rates reported to the VAERS system this year (this is the official adverse event reporting system relied on by the FDA and CDC to spot safety signals). In their view, there is “nothing to see” in the death chart below. They claim that the propensity to report (PTR) is much higher this year and that all the events (with the exception of a few) are all simply reporting background events that were not caused by the vaccines.

Untitledvac12.jpg

There’s just one tiny little problem with that explanation: there is a CDC paper that proves that they are lying. Big time.

I will show below that even if we believed everything they said, it can’t explain all the deaths and severe adverse events. The data simply doesn’t fit their hypothesis. At all.

The reality is the vaccines are extremely dangerous, they kill more than they save for every age range (it’s worse the younger you are), and they should be halted immediately, not green lighted like the FDA committee just did. All vaccine mandates should be rescinded.

The CDC paper

In a nutshell, there is a paper written by five CDC authors, The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome, that was published a year ago in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Untitledvac7.jpg
The paper claims that serious adverse events in the past have been under-reported by at most a factor of 8.3 (known as the under-reporting factor (URF)).

This means that in the best possible scenario, where there is full reporting (i.e., where the URF=1 and the PTR, defined as the avg URF/current URF, is 8.3), a reporting rate of serious adverse events that is 8.3X higher than the previous reporting rate for that symptom could be safely ignored as simply due to a higher propensity to report the naturally occurring rate of background events.

While theoretically you could have a URF of <1, this is unlikely since the HHS verifies all records before they are put in the database and eliminates duplicates. There are mistakes that happen but they are minor, e..g, we know of 2 gamed records out of the 1.6M VAERS reports. So the minimum URF would be 1 and it would be nearly impossible to achieve from a practical standpoint.

Here’s the problem. This year, with the COVID vaccines, there are a huge number of serious adverse events that are reported at a rate that is more than 8.3X higher than previous years. In fact, nearly every serious event I investigated was elevated from previous years by significantly more than this. I documented this in an important video on VAERS serious adverse event reports that I hope everyone will watch.

Unfortunately, none of the people at the FDA, CDC, or on their respective outside committees has ever watched that video. If they did, they would immediately realize the enormous mistakes that have been made and I’m sure take corrective action.

But cognitive dissonance prevents them from watching the video. I think the only way to force them to watch the video would be to physically strap them in a chair and put clamps on their eyes as was done in the movie “A Clockwork Orange.”

How do you explain the rates of pulmonary embolism?

The most stunning serious adverse event I found was pulmonary embolism (PE).

As I show in the video, the average annual number of reports of PE per year in VAERS for all vaccines was 1.4. So we’d expect to see at most 11.6 PE events this year according to the belief system of the FDA and CDC. Well, one tiny little problem: with the COVID vaccines, there were 1,131 reports, nearly a 100-fold increase over the “best case” scenario. Please watch the video on VAERS serious adverse event reports to see this for yourself.

Also, for those suffering from “cognitive dissonance syndrome” (this is a common affliction of people who think the vaccines are safe), the increase in reports isn’t due to increased rates of vaccination either as we explain in this paper which shows historical vaccination rates among various age groups.

In other words, even if you totally buy the bullshit argument of the FDA and CDC (which they never justified with analysis or data) that the URF=1 this year, it still means that 99% of the reports of pulmonary embolism (PE) are unexplainable. They must be caused by “something” and that something has to be very big and it has to be correlated with the administration of the vaccine because the PE reporting rate was correlated with the vaccine administration.

If these PE events weren’t caused by the vaccine, then what caused them?

Nobody can explain that. Nobody even attempts to explain it. Nobody even wants to talk about it.

But since the mainstream media and fact checkers are completely tone deaf to safety reports, they never ask the question. They never will. It would explode the whole false narrative.

We kill 15 people to maybe save 1. Are we nuts?

Furthermore, if we use the same methodology as used by the CDC in their paper to determine the actual underreporting factor for this year, but we use a much more accurate reference, we find that the best estimate for the minimum URF is 41. For less serious events you’d use a higher number since healthcare workers and consumers are far less likely to report less serious events. So using 41 is always “safe” in that it will not overestimate any event.

This means that we’ve killed well over 150,000 Americans so far, and all of those deaths had to be caused by the vaccine because there is simply no other explanation that fits all the facts. See this paper for the details. The paper also details 7 other ways that the number was validated and none of those methods used the VAERS data at all. This makes it impossible for anyone to credibly attack the analysis. Nobody wants to debate us on this.

And Pfizer’s own Phase 3 study showed that we save only 1 COVID death for every 22,000 people we vaccinate (you have to see Table S4 in the supplement to learn that 2 people died from COVID who were unvaccinated and 1 person died from COVID who got the vaccine, so a net savings of 1 life).

We have fully vaccinated almost 220M Americans which means we may save an estimated 10,000 lives from COVID per the Pfizer study which is the most definitive data we have (since “real scientists” ONLY trust the data in the double-blind randomized controlled trials).

Yet the VAERS data shows we killed over 150,000 Americans from the vaccine to achieve that goal.

In other words, we killed 15 people for every COVID life we might save.

But it’s worse than that because the Pfizer study was done pre-Delta. The Pfizer vaccine was developed for Alpha variant and is less effective against Delta. So our numbers are even more extreme.

This means of course that the FDA, CDC, and their outside committees are all incompetent in their ability to spot safety signals. They couldn’t even spot the death safety signal. It also means that the vaccine mandates are immoral and unethical.

Inconvenient truth: vaccine-induced myocarditis is neither rare or mild

When we apply the proper URF to the myocarditis data, we find that myocarditis goes from a “rare” event to a common event.

Using data from the CDC and applying the correct URF, for 16 year-old boys, the rate of myocarditis is 1 in 317 as we can see from this slide from our All you need to know deck. That’s not rare. That’s a train wreck.

Untitledvac11.jpg

Also, as far as the myocarditis being “mild” that’s bullshit too. According to the cardiologists I talked to such as Peter McCullough, there is no such thing as mild myocarditis. Anytime you have an event that puts a teenager in the hospital, that’s problematic. In fact, as we show in All you need to know, troponin levels can rise to extreme levels and stay elevated for months. Troponin is a marker of heart damage. Unlike a heart attack, the levels are much higher and they stay elevated for much longer. The damage that is done is usually permanent and it may lead to loss of life within 5 years. Of course nobody knows the death rate in 5 years. We’ll find out in 5 years. Our kids are enrolled in the clinical trial of this by getting vaccinated, but we don’t notify the parents of this. And the kids are clueless because the doctors tell them it is safe. They believe the doctors. The doctors believe the CDC. And the CDC was lying. And now the CDC simply doesn’t want to talk to us about it. I get that.

There are thousands of elevated events

It’s not just a few symptoms that are elevated. There are thousands of them. If they don’t kill you, you can be disabled for life, even after you use the right drugs to rid yourself of the damaging effects of the vaccines.


Here are the pills taken daily by a friend of mine (a former top nurse at one of the top medical schools in the US) who has been injured for life from the vaccine and cannot work (she’s a single mom).

Untitledvac8.jpg
Medication and supplements taken before vaccine injury: 0

Compensation received from the US government for her injuries: 0

Censorship has replaced scientific debate

This is embarrassing for everyone: the CDC, FDA, Congress, mainstream media, and the medical community. This is why nobody will debate me and my team of experts in an open debate. Because nobody wants to face the fact that they were wrong.

The public wants a debate. It’s overwhelming. I’ve never seen such a lopsided survey result in my life:

But nobody supporting the false narrative will debate us. These people are not accountable to public opinion. They are all driven by what Biden wants. And Biden wants to inject us. All of us.

TrialSiteNews made this public call for a debate; nobody responded. They even reached out to Pfizer and they refused to debate. We weren’t surprised.

Untitledvac13.jpg

Of course they won’t debate. They never will. Here’s why:

Untitledvac10.jpg

So censorship and ad hominem attacks are the preferred method for disputing what I wrote in this article and my other articles because nobody is able to attack the data or our methodology in a live debate with a neutral moderator.

It’s not just me of course. There are dozens of respected scientists, doctors, and statisticians who agree with me (see slide 82 TFNT #1: COVID vaccines have killed over 200,000 Americans for a partial list).

Summary

The FDA and CDC are caught between a rock and a hard place as I explain in my video on the VAERS statistics. They cannot reveal the true URF and PTR because that would put them in hot water; it would be an admission that they got it totally wrong on the myocarditis data and everything else.

So they have to lie and claim the current URF=1 so that the PTR is maximized at 8.3. But then they have a huge problem because adverse events like death and pulmonary embolism are impossible to explain.

So they are in a no win situation. To play out the game, they avoid being questioned and simply refuse to answer. They are like a magician using misdirection. We are told to focus on all the lives being saved and to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain (i.e., all the deaths and disabilities).

For more information on vaccine safety, please check out my comprehensive vaccine safety slide deck, All you need to know. I am pleased to report that it has been used successfully to reverse vaccine mandates. At least some people are listening.

The good news is far more people are speaking out and moving to the anti-vaccine camp. The numbers keep growing every day.

It will be interesting to see how long the medical community can keep up the charade. The longer they resist, the worse it will be when this house of cards comes tumbling down.
 

Attachments

  • All you need to know About Vaccine Safety - PDF.pdf
    12.7 MB · Views: 27

luc

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Germany: in the state of Hesse the authorities now allow all food stores (including supermarkets) to ban un-vaccinated people. I guess a number of food stores will not apply this ban. Time will tell.

Even worse: in those stores implementing this draconian rule, you don't need to wear masks or keep distances anymore! So there is an incentive for stores to do that or at least trying it out. And many people actually might demand that stores implement the rule so that they don't have to wear masks anymore, to hell with those "irresponsible unvaxed"! But time will tell how this will play out, there is already some resistance growing and stores don't want any bad press, so let's see...
 

psychegram

The Living Force
Even worse: in those stores implementing this draconian rule, you don't need to wear masks or keep distances anymore! So there is an incentive for stores to do that or at least trying it out. And many people actually might demand that stores implement the rule so that they don't have to wear masks anymore, to hell with those "irresponsible unvaxed"! But time will tell how this will play out, there is already some resistance growing and stores don't want any bad press, so let's see...

One possible complication to using unmasking as an incentive is that the covidians seem deeply reluctant to come out from under their face diapers, regardless of how many boosters they get.
 

lilies

The Living Force
Top Bottom