About this topic some questions:
¿Why are you so concerned about the future?
¿Do you need a clear crystal prediction about what is going to happen?
¿Will this knowledge ease the task of walking the path?
This board is about questions, ¿What to ask to C's?
For me, for instance, I don't know what to ask. If I don't know about something, then I cannot ask. If I know and belief about it, then I do not need to ask. It's not about what I don't know, so it's really about I already know. Therefore it is to support you on an already taken decision, that is to clarify when confronting an intersection (on your life). For this reason you don't need C's, you need third party opinions. Even if you ask for these opinions, you will see that you collect direct answers and other opinions. Nonetheless you never loose your freedom because you are self-dependant. It is obvious that I'm writing on this Forum because I believe something. But I do not believe all and everything I read. For instance I replied to Laura recently because what I belief is the opposite of what she tells. Just to confront and research. This is something we cannot do easily in the society. For instance the very basic human reaction is to reply for presenting a defense. ¿Defense against what? ¿An opinion?
At the end you see the root of the problem: what happens when another being tells you what is or what is not. If you tend to belief what you're gonna listen, then you stop thinking to enslave your belief system, delegating it to others. No sense at all.
About the half-past-human Web Site.
Hi all. Last night Laura posed the following question to the Cs:
Is Clif High at halfpasthuman.com on to something or not...?
The Cs responded, "Definitely!"
It was not elaborated whether this referred to the methodology involved in the HPH project, or the analysis or accuracy of the data, or both, but Clif and Igor are "definitely" on to something...
The session transcript will likely be up in a day or two.
¿Are they behind something? Definetely. Of course they are. ¿What is all about? All there is, is lessons. Where behind knoweldge, pure conscient assimilation of information. If this Web Site really works: great! A Mass Data Mining project sustained by one tiny person. This is really great. This is also being developed by the military, with hundreds of millions invested.
Back to the question: I also think that the question is vague (but the answer is direct). Nonetheless I have 2 thoughts about this:
1.- You want to confirm a prediction.
There is one:
Q: (J) Is swine flu going to make a comeback this winter?
A: Sure. They are working on drastic reduction of the population before climate change goes too far. Can't have all those starving people after their heads now can they?
But this is not really a hidden one (prediction). When you do long term planning, everything has to be planned, everything has to be done in advance. The military as I read have a planning about future events they have to face. One is a world wide epidemy in Year 2009 that may kill no more than 30/90M people. This will be a warning for a huge pandemia that will kill thousands of millions one day in the future (before 2035/50). This is the army planning how to handle social crisis that are not related to simple wars. Two more samples: I read that some UK soldiers where ready for duty and within a transport ship to Afganistan before the 9-11th, and that america's army requested 1 million bullets one year in advance. This is planning. But this really may not interest us, as we will do nothing with this info. I remember Babazid the Sufi master saying to a child, don't care about the path, don't follow the other guys. If we target the same destination we will meet again when we arrive, even following a different path. One thing changed me not so long time ago, it is that there is a huge amount of info that does not affect me everyday, on my real life. Info is OK, Knowledge is OK, but if there is no application at all, few things change on your life. And the key behind all is that there is “a world war” currently in place, being handled by others, and we are the spectators. There are no hidden torture chambers in nazi territory, there are in Abu Graib and Guantanamo base. See at present day, no secrets at all, they appear on the TV. No need to hide, we are robots that live and do nothing to change. This is the big secret, to show info as normal so get accustom to “... these things happen ... we can do nothing”.
To awake is one thing, to act is another very different thing!
2.- Second thought: you're interested in data mining. You want confirmation about something was gathered that is true.
I also became interested in this topic because the subject: Data Mining. I had several times the idea of doing something in the real life, on Internet. I'm a computer science engineer with some expertise in serveral areas. One personal project that arised now is an “Ontology based programming language”, or somewhat similar. When I research and save info, I store it through 12 hard drives and I already have few TB of data. Nonetheless if I have to cross information or reorder: it is an impossible task. It is impossible to adjust the current tool set to fit my needs. At the same time this apply to others, on my job (large insurance corporation), on data mining in general. I do not have robots, I am the one who search, download, select, choose and store.
Nonetheless clarify: data itself is nothing without comprehension
. The responsible of this project was linked to people such as: Project Camelot, Rense.
Hi JPS --
I agree, and I know what you mean -- see my very first post on this thread (second paragraph). Many of the places that Clif (and George) appear for interviews (see also the post by RflctnOfU above regarding this issue) are known disinfo outlets that have been discussed in some detail on this forum. The question is whether or not Clif is cognizant of this, and/or whether or not his strategy is to get the message out through whatever way possible or not. I think a lot of the gray area may actually involve whether or not Clif ever stumbled upon the Cass material (and related material like Ra) and how much he has digested it if he has -- I have to admit that before I found this forum, I really wouldn't have been nearly as critical of sites like Rense and Project Camelot, merely because I didn't have enough of a knowledge base and skills of discernment to know any better. I frankly think that helpful things appear on both of these sites from time to time; the problem is that the core in each case has been ponerized (in the case of Rense, this was probably always the plan; in the case of Project Camelot, its possible that the original intentions may have been good, but hard to tell) to the extent that a lot of garbage has to be separated from the occasional pearls.
One thing is clear: if someone for me is not trustable I try to avoid any contact at all. This person can provide nothing good to me. If the responsible of the site is to be able to crush all information and extract some useful data at all: it must be capable of. If I am capable of targeting someone as not trustable and he is not, then as a consquence we have a conflict. Then he is also targeted as may be useful, but no to rely on (not very much).
I hope this post to be useful for somebody.