Or as Scott Black, who says he saw the animal roaming in his backyard over the weekend described it, “it had big, long, pointy ears, a long tail, had no skin, or no fur rather.” Black told KPRC-TV that it had “splotches of gray and splotches of raw skin.”
Anthony said:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/04/some-people-think-this-picture-shows-the-mythical-chupacabra-in-texas/
Or as Scott Black, who says he saw the animal roaming in his backyard over the weekend described it, “it had big, long, pointy ears, a long tail, had no skin, or no fur rather.” Black told KPRC-TV that it had “splotches of gray and splotches of raw skin.”
Horseofadifferentcolor said:Looks like a canine with mange. Poor thing must be miserable.
Nienna said:Horseofadifferentcolor said:Looks like a canine with mange. Poor thing must be miserable.
Note: Rant in progress.
This has been the case in just about every "chupacabra" sighting. A canine, or raccoon, or some other similar animal with a horrible case of mange. It's a horrible thing for the animal to suffer, or so I think.
If people would just stop trying to sensationalize things such as these poor animals, what a chupacabra was orignally said to be was a "goat sucker". It supposedly only fed on the blood of it's victims leaving the body fairly drained of blood. It, also, had wings. This is what was reported and it all could be made up. BUT, if an animal only fed on blood, it wouldn't need a full mouth of teeth, as canines have. Just my subjective opinion. When you see the mouths of the animals that have been killed, they have the teeth of a canine.
Anyway, as you can see, I get really annoyed at blaming animals with a horrible skin condition as being a monster.
This has been the case in just about every "chupacabra" sighting. A canine, or raccoon, or some other similar animal with a horrible case of mange. It's a horrible thing for the animal to suffer, or so I think.
Corvinus said:This has been the case in just about every "chupacabra" sighting. A canine, or raccoon, or some other similar animal with a horrible case of mange. It's a horrible thing for the animal to suffer, or so I think.
I think it is used as a cover up because it ends up that all those genuine sightings and similar cases were work of over-imagination and "lies", and that there is a rational explanation - dogs and other animals with disease.