Belarus

Belarus has been under some form of western NGO/color revolution pressure for years and years, but never 'received the full Maidan treatment' because Lukashenko played a balancing act between East and West.

We warned on Sott.net in June this year that Lukashenko's failure to 'play ball' with Covid-19, and indeed his outspoken criticism of it as a 'scamdemic', would likely result in 'internal' political difficulties for him.

It looks like the heat was recently turned up on Belarus to force him out and extract submission from the Belarusian people. ALL must 'wear the mask', ALL must kneel, ALL must obey...
 
Belarus has been under some form of western NGO/color revolution pressure for years and years, but never 'received the full Maidan treatment' because Lukashenko played a balancing act between East and West.

We warned on Sott.net in June this year that Lukashenko's failure to 'play ball' with Covid-19, and indeed his outspoken criticism of it as a 'scamdemic', would likely result in 'internal' political difficulties for him.

It looks like the heat was recently turned up on Belarus to force him out and extract submission from the Belarusian people. ALL must 'wear the mask', ALL must kneel, ALL must obey...

Yes, In simple words he exposed a fake pandemic and told the truth about the bribes from the IMF, the money promised in return for introducing rigour and freezing the economy.

As my friend said : "Disobedient President ruin the atmosphere of international upper crust"
 
Canada refuses to accept the results of the recent presidential elections in Belarus. Canada should be quiet, that "peoplekind" Trudeau is a suspicious choice as well, should we oppose?

Similarities between other Western backed coups are striking. The West refused to accept Maduro as the president of Venezuela, who's going to be their puppet in Belarus?

Canada Does Not Accept Results of Belarusian Presidential Election, Foreign Minister Says

There was a rally of several hundred people in Berlin protesting Lukashenko, the neocon's playbook hasn't been updated in a looooong time:


Luckily, like Venezuela's Maduro and Syria's Assad, Lukashenko asked Moscow for help and Putin agreed to help maintain security of Belarus.

I can certainly believe there are some legitimate protesters and that Belarus isn't a perfect little country - nowhere is. But there are many signs of the mad times we are living in that Belarus has managed to avoid. One example is the fact that their children are growing up free form the postmodern and gender fluid madness that's poisoning the West.


Comments under this video express sentimental longing for a world where postmodernism doesn't exist:
"You can tell this society only has two genders."
"Holy crap...women who look like women."
"This is what I am talking about eastern European brothers and sisters class and true culture not these westerners promoting all that is wrong with this world!"
"That's the one irony about the Iron Curtain: it shielding the former Soviet Bloc from neoliberal degeneracy."
 
Belarus – Lukashenko’s dangerous political games with Russia and Ukraine
07/08/2020

On the night of 29 July, Belarus announced that it had arrested 33 citizens from Russia working for a “security” company (i.e. mercenaries in reality) for allegedly planning to destabilize the presidential election. Some of them having been Ukrainian citizens in the past, Ukraine jumped on the occasion and demanded the extradition of those involved in the Donbass war. As a result, Lukashenko is trying to raise the stakes between Russia and Ukraine in a most dangerous game, the consequences of which could be far more serious for Belarus than its President imagines.
Strange arrest of Russian citizens on bogus charges
While the presidential election is in full swing in Belarus, the Minsk authorities announced that they had arrested 33 Russian citizens, belonging to the notorious Wagner company, on the pretext that they were planning to destabilize the situation in the country. But from the outset this scenario was sinking like the Titanic.

The men in question were unarmed and had entered Belarus legally. They had gone to the hotel where they had provided their passports and then went to a sanatorium. And it was there that they allegedly attracted the attention of the authorities because they… were not drinking, were not partying, and were walking around in military dress.

Yes, it is true that it is “abnormal” to have mercenaries in transit for another country, who have serious combat experience, are in military dress, and do not drink, or go around nightclubs. Which serious security company would hire beginners and let its employees drink alcohol or go partying while they go on a mission? Come on, a bit of logic, please.

In front of such an unfathomable well of abyssal stupidity most sane people thought that this story would quickly collapse like a house of cards. Moscow, moreover, repeatedly stressed the futility of the charges against the 33 Russian citizens in Belarus, and demanded that they be sent back to Russia.

Especially since their plane tickets to Turkey (for 25 July) were found by Regnum’s Russian journalists and published online. There are even return tickets for October 2020.

Belarus then argued that they did not leave as planned on 25 July, which proves that they were not in transit, while at the same time saying that the messages that the Russians were exchanging indicated that they were waiting for another group of their compatriots. Or how to shoot in the head of the bogus “Russian-style Maidan” hypothesis.


If they did not take the flight on July 25, it is certainly precisely because they were waiting for the others to leave all together for their destination. So what is the point of this circus towards Russia on behalf of Belarus?

A totally chaotic presidential election
It is in the internal political situation in Belarus that we must look for the origin of this delusional attack against Russia. Lukashenko’s re-election is not going as well as he might have hoped, so several potential candidates have been ousted on dubious pretexts, one has been arrested, the husband of an opponent of Lukashenko too, and another candidate has fled to Russia to avoid the same fate!

The presidential elections of 2020 in Belarus thus seem to be definitively marked by the seal of fraud. Indeed, on the first day of voting, more than 2,000 violations were recorded by independent observers.

And in the midst of this mess, Lukashenko made completely paranoid and contradictory statements about the use of nuclear weapons against his country, threatening his big neighbour with barely veiled words, complaining that relations with Russia have gone from being fraternal to being partners’ relations, saying that Moscow is afraid of losing Belarus because it would have no real allies besides itself (which contradicts the previous point), and went completely delirious about the history of the arrested Russian citizens, adding even more entropy to the surrounding chaos.

Belarus even went so far as to hysterically summon its reservists for military exercises near the Russian border the day after the presidential election!

And after having himself created this collective hysteria on the basis of a non-existent threat, Lukashenko went so far as to reproach the “politicisation” of all this (by Russia), and the alleged attempts to scare him with the Americans and NATO, and the consequences of Belarus’s actions, saying that he knows them perfectly well.

The most unbelievable thing is that after having said in that statement that there was no point in frightening him with the United States and NATO, because it was not them who sent men to destabilize the situation in Belarus, he then said that he had also arrested people with American passports who were married to women working for the American State Department.

After accusing Russia of trying to influence the presidential election in Belarus, Lukashenko has now flip-flopped and accused the United States as well, in order to prove to his electorate that he is not working for the United States (such accusations flourished after the arrest of Russian citizens). If this is what Lukashenko calls Belarus’ multi-vector approach, I regret to say that trying to sit with your ass between two chairs rarely ends well.

And it is not a “threat” about the consequences of his actions that to say it is a warning! If the example of the Maidan in Ukraine was not enough of a lesson for him, it is to be feared that he will end up much worse than Viktor Yanukovich. For in trying to play the Western card by openly negotiating with Ukraine the potential extradition of some of the arrested Russians, Lukashenko has crossed the Rubicon and openly betrayed Russia.

Belarus tries to raise the stakes between Russia and Ukraine, destroying the Minsk negotiating platform in the process
Indeed, Lukashenko in his paranoid outbursts does not seem to have understood that he has gone too far in his delirium. By making public the names, dates of birth and backgrounds of the arrested men, Belarus has drawn the attention of Ukraine, which saw this as a golden opportunity to get its hands on some of the Donbass veterans.

Kiev requested the extradition of the Russian citizens concerned, arguing that some of them were originally Ukrainian citizens. Except that they had obtained Russian citizenship, and that argument therefore does not hold water, as the Russian authorities have pointed out, who have once again insisted on their return to Russia.

The problem is that instead of spurning Ukraine, Lukashenko openly discussed the extradition of these Russian citizens with Vladimir Zelensky, the Ukrainian President, before giving an interview to Dmitry Gordon, the chief propagandist of Kiev!

An interview at the end of which Gordon said that Belarus would agree to extradite Russian citizens requested by Ukraine.

While many in Russia refuse to consider this possible (on the grounds that it would put an end to the union between the two countries, with disastrous consequences for Minsk), the mere fact that Belarus has even initiated official discussions on this subject without Russian participation was considered unacceptable by Tatiana Moskalkova, the Russian human rights ombudsman.

And instead of calming down the game, Lukashenko threw oil on the fire, issuing what is nothing more and nothing less than an ultimatum, asking Russia and Ukraine to send their General Prosecutors to Belarus to discuss all this, but that if they didn’t do so, Minsk would decide the fate of the arrested people all by itself! If that sounds like blackmail to you, that’s normal, because it is!

Lukashenko is actually trying to raise the stakes to get something from Russia. If some experts think that it is a question of obtaining official recognition of the results of this totally fraudulent presidential election, others think that Lukashenko wants much more, and would in fact like to get Russia to “shave for free” Belarus (i.e. to provide it with gas and oil at really cheap, not to say free of charge), hoping to resume good relations with Russia afterwards!

And for this he counts on the “friendship” he thinks he has with Vladimir Putin, as he boasted in the interview he gave to Gordon.

Except that Lukashenko has forgotten one thing: if there is one crime that is unforgivable in the eyes of Vladimir Putin, it is treason! As he said in an interview with the Financial Times in 2019, treason is “the vilest crime imaginable”. Believing that after having crossed the Rubicon in this way, he will be able to pick up the pieces with Russia, even by giving back his citizens, shows that Lukashenko does not have the intelligence he thinks he has.

For even if he does not go until the end of the process and returns the 33 mercenaries to Russia, the very fact of having publicly considered extraditing some of them to Ukraine for their involvement in the Donbass war has just shattered Belarus’s neutrality in the conflict.

Yet it is this neutrality that had allowed Minsk to become a platform for negotiations, resulting in the agreements that bear its name! Without this neutrality, Minsk is no longer a safe place to conduct negotiations on the Donbass conflict once the coronavirus epidemic is over, and discussions between Ukraine and the two People’s Republics will no longer be held in video-conference format!

If Ukraine totally destroyed the negotiation process, it was Belarus that destroyed the platform on which they were taking place, burying the Minsk agreements for good! For how could the DPR and LPR (Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics) send their representatives to negotiate in Belarus after that? How could the two republics risk having their foreign ministers arrested under a bogus pretext and extradited to Ukraine?

Whether or not he goes to the end of his suicidal approach, Lukashenko has already set in motion a process that could lead to chaos and the descent into hell of Belarus and its inhabitants. All this in order to keep his place as President, to try to extort more privileges from Russia, and to get the attention of the Russian authorities!

The Belarusian frog who wanted to make himself as big as Russian beef
The problem is that in order to carry out such blackmail against a country like Russia and make it bend, you need to have a strong enough backbone and not just 33 hostages. For if Minsk can titillate Moscow, Russia can plunge Belarus into chaos if it wants to.

As a reminder, almost 40% of Belarus’ exports are destined for Russia, and 60% of its imports come from the same country. One does not blackmail a country with such a large market share, except to be suicidal.

And if Lukashenko thinks he can compensate the loss of the Russian market by the Ukrainian market, or even the Western one, I advise him to look at the state of the Ukrainian economy to see what awaits him: begging the IMF for crumbs, and having to sell everything and go through the austerity grinder to get those crumbs!

Russia was keen to sound a warning shot in order to give Belarus a foretaste of what awaits it if Lukashenko goes too far. It should be noted that the border between Russia and Belarus more or less resembles the borders in the Shengen area.

Until 1 August, truck drivers only had to show their passports to the border guards from the cab of their lorries and they passed without further formality. But on 1 August, Russia changed the rules, forcing drivers to get out of their lorries and queue at the checkpoint to show their passports and have everything recorded by computer. Officially it is because of the coronavirus, but one suspects that the date on which these measures came into force is mainly a warning to Minsk.

As a result, queues of about ten kilometres formed on the border between Belarus and Russia! However, a large part of Belarusian exports to Russia are food products, mostly perishable. And that’s nothing yet, it’s just queues.

If Belarus extradites some of the arrested Russian citizens to Ukraine, then Minsk could taste the same soup as Turkey after it shot down a Russian military plane in 2015. The economic sanctions imposed by Russia in Istanbul have cost Turkey more than $10 billion in economic losses. Enough to calm Erdogan down and make him apologize for the downed plane in order to prevent a total economic catastrophe!

Is Belarus really prepared to lose $12 billion in annual exports to Russia, but also the fact that Moscow regularly agrees to postpone the repayment of Minsk’s debts?

In his interview with Gordon, Lukashenko complains about relations with his neighbour, saying that Russia is strangling Belarus and that it is a mistake for Moscow to have such relations with Minsk. But in reality what he is complaining about is not being maintained at the expense of the princess! If he wants to see what a real economic strangulation of his country is, all he has to do is to go till the end of his stupid move.

Seeing Lukashenko raise the stakes with his ultimatum to send the Russian and Ukrainian General Prosecutors, one gets the feeling that the Belarusian President is seeking the attention of his Russian counterpart. However, since the beginning of this crisis, Vladimir Putin has remained Olympian calm and has not contacted Lukashenko till the last moment to resolve the problem, which clearly shows that the friendship he boasts of with the Russian President exists only in his head!

If their relationship was what he claims, he would have immediately contacted Vladimir Putin from the very beginning of the incident to settle this in private. Instead, Lukashenko himself organized the dramatization and hysteria around this story for sordid electoral purposes.

As a result, Russia distanced itself from the chaos in Belarus and refused to send its observers to monitor the presidential election.

And by wanting to play on both sides (Russian and Western), Lukashenko could well lose the support of both parties! Trying to sit with your ass between two chairs often ends up on the floor. The Belarusian President seems to have forgotten that you can’t have the butter, the money of the butter, the ass of the creamer and her smile with it.

Even if he wins this election, it is tainted by so many irregularities and violations that Lukashenko will have no legitimacy. Worse still, by wanting to eat off all the racks, the Belarusian President may well have sawed off the branch on which he is sitting.

And by alienating Russia, he has just closed the only way out he had if he fails in the elections, or if he is subsequently overthrown. For the West will not welcome “Europe’s last dictator” if he falls off its pedestal, and unlike Yanukovych, who had good relations with Russia, he will not be able to count on this second option either.

Contrary to some analysts, I do not rule out that Lukashenko could go through with his stupid move and extradite some of the Russian citizens arrested to Ukraine. Because Russia will not play its blackmail game. Moscow does not negotiate with terrorists and hostage-takers. Another fact that Lukashenko has forgotten.

And in view of the manifest instability of the Belarusian President (one only has to read his statements of the last few days, which contradict each other), no scenario should be ruled out on the pretext that it is totally suicidal for a country. Ukraine proved in 2014 that there are politicians crazy enough to engage in such stupid plans.

If Lukashenko goes through with this deadly step and is re-elected, then God help the Belarusian people. For the time being Russia is patiently waiting for the result of the elections in Belarus, and to see if Lukashenko will go through with his crazy move. Only once the situation is clear will Moscow react, and only then will it be possible to gauge the extent to which Belarus will or will not suffer as a result of the lamentable attitude of its President.

Christelle Néant

 
I can certainly believe there are some legitimate protesters and that Belarus isn't a perfect little country - nowhere is. But there are many signs of the mad times we are living in that Belarus has managed to avoid. One example is the fact that their children are growing up free form the postmodern and gender fluid madness that's poisoning the West.

Unfortunately, this may change now. Here's one example:

1 (564).jpg

If Lukashenko goes through with this deadly step and is re-elected, then God help the Belarusian people. For the time being Russia is patiently waiting for the result of the elections in Belarus, and to see if Lukashenko will go through with his crazy move. Only once the situation is clear will Moscow react, and only then will it be possible to gauge the extent to which Belarus will or will not suffer as a result of the lamentable attitude of its President.

Just a note, since this was posted only now, that the info and the analysis in the article are already outdated and not relevant.The elections have happened, and the Russian detained were returned home.

Also, a suggestion for next time, is to put the text in quotes, or to quote only the relevant parts along with your own comments. It's harder and more time consuming to read the entire article without knowing what exactly you are trying to point out. :-)
 
Unfortunately, this may change now. Here's one example:

View attachment 38407



Just a note, since this was posted only now, that the info and the analysis in the article are already outdated and not relevant.The elections have happened, and the Russian detained were returned home.

Also, a suggestion for next time, is to put the text in quotes, or to quote only the relevant parts along with your own comments. It's harder and more time consuming to read the entire article without knowing what exactly you are trying to point out. :-)
It is always to be "behind on events, it is the message of a contact with whom I made the translations from French into Arabic on the events of Donbass and who works there as a journalist. I'm sorry , I only read it today ...
 
Unfortunately, this may change now. Here's one example:

View attachment 38407

I'm quite curious about LGBT's popularity in such a conservative society as Belarus. I happen to have quite a few friends from Belarus and most look up to the West and idealise Western living standards. Yet all of them, without an exception, oppose gender fluidity and to a very large extent LGBT in general.

The ones I met in London without exception are against Lukashenko and they are all from Minsk or surrounding areas. Yet many of the ones I met in Poland (probably half) were his supporters and unlike the Belorussian immigrants I met in London they wanted to live in their country.

I guess it's impossible to accurately and objectively judge a country based on the sentiments and opinions of those who left it as they are likely to be people who left for an economic, political or social reason. But in my personal and very subjective experience they are even more conservative than Poland is and although gender ideology is being pushed in Poland the push back from the society is pretty strong. LGBT isn't doing too well outside large cities either. In fact, from what I've noticed LGBT was continuously gaining more and more support and acceptance until transgender and gender fluid crazies joined them, causing many people to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
 
Last edited:
We warned on Sott.net in June this year that Lukashenko's failure to 'play ball' with Covid-19, and indeed his outspoken criticism of it as a 'scamdemic', would likely result in 'internal' political difficulties for him.

Very interesting. So this came out yesterday implying that Lukashenko is responsible for the violence. Cointelpro!

Joined April 2020

With many wearing mask!



Images from Minsk | August 10th - 11th, 2020 | Belarus
 
Last edited:
I'm quite curious about LGBT's popularity in such a conservative society as Belarus. I happen to have quite a few friends from Belarus and most look up to the West and idealise Western living standards. Yet all of them, without an exception, oppose gender fluidity and to a very large extent LGBT in general.

Well, according to this map Belarus is far from ideal for "LGBT travel", but better than Russia. 😅 I hink it has to do with the fact that many in Belarus, just like in Russia, are provoslavic, and there is also a big percentage of catholic, especially in the areas bordering Poland or Baltic countries.

But as we know, color revolutions go hand in hand with the rest of "Western freedom", so it's possible that some LGBT activists will feel more comfortable to promote their position.
 
@Keit @Ant22

There is one thing yet: Very often the way to popularize certain ideology etc. is by giving to them the creation of the illusion about their popularity. And in the results of this, it's interpreted by the authoritarian followers as the "correct" one.

That first stage is mostly dependent on establishing the channels between source group of interests and a sufficient number of people who are prone and ready to serve them to create the illusion of "living ideology" (and the significant minority), who work, for instance, by saying in the name of the other people of who can be pulled up under the name of the ideology, without their approval.

The next stage is that sufficient illusionary group make the influence on the rest of people with the authoritarian features, who is an easy way soak up with the idealogy which seem to look to them to be "meaningful". In other words, first seeded idealogy, spill up, on these people. The next stage is fight between these "infected" with such a revolutionist and those who keep the core and are skeptic, opposite, reluctant or indifferent.

The most keys things are the 1) open channels access and amount of the cashflow, efforts, and other resources disposed of by the source to find the proper people to lead the beginning of particular ideology; 2) if the planted new group did his job correctly they start to be perceived by the authoritarian followers as the "good"/"correct" idea etc.; 3) and the last matters how normal non-authoritarian part of the society will be engaged into questioning, criticizing the new ideology, how generally they will tend to learn to find the other ideas for protecting themselves and establish higher goals in their life, not related to the ideology, which is given to them and finally general willpower to keep on track with all these things.
 
Belarus: Lukashenko resists and announces Russian support
Revolutions are both an anti-democratic and an anti-political phenomenon. Anti-democratic, because they must allow a minority to take power against a majority. And anti-political, because, as a consequence of what has just been written, they necessarily involve recourse to the street and to force, bypassing the planned political mechanisms for the transfer of power. The attempted revolution in Belarus is no exception to the rule. But it comes after the Ukrainian Maîdan, the receipts no longer take so easily and Russia has finally expressed its official position in support of Lukashenko.


We had detailed the preparation and the staging of the street in our previous text (read it here), the street, this fundamental element which should make it possible to bypass the ballot boxes. It is in this logic that the spokesperson for the opposition candidate, already on the run, Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, told Russian radio Les Echos de Moscow that they are not asking for a recount or a second round. .

It's surprising ... If all the Belarusian people voted against Lukashenko for her and so she lost the elections, suddenly rigged, why not ask for a recount? Because, if all the Belarusian people voted for it, there must remain traces of it ... Either the traces have been erased ... So why not ask for a second round? Under the Western spotlight, she should be sure to win ... If all the Belarusian people are fed up with Lukashenko and support her ... it seems ... Unless, in fact, the majority of these voters do. have not supported that much and that she is certain to lose at the polls.

Hence the importance of the street, to give an illusion of mass. In 2020, there are 6,844,932 voters in Belarus for a population of nearly 9.5 million people. Even though there were several thousand demonstrators in the streets, we are very, very far from "all the Belarusian people", which is looping in the main stream media. Thus, the only legitimacy of this opposition, which must compensate for its lack of legality to govern, is purely ... media.

Then the lessons of the Maidan were learned. Mainly three. The first, which provokes the ire of Westerners, an ire echoed docilely by the "independent" media therefore aligned, is that the police must intervene immediately, so as not to let the situation rot and take on the proportions that we saw in Kiev. And the fact that little Belarus stands up and holds its country against the global world, which has the monopoly of the heart (which still speaks of the mind?) Destabilizes the order of things - as intended.

The second lesson is to refuse Western intermediaries in possible negotiations with the opposition. In principle, these negotiations are useless, because there can be no compromise: those who have lost want power without taking the electoral risk, either we leave them the power, or we do not leave them. What compromise? The EU has offered its help to get in touch with the opposition, in other words to lead Lukashenko out, since this is the only position acceptable to the global world. As was the case with Yanukovich's betrayal in Ukraine. Lukashenko refused a priori any intermediary and refuses any contact with a "Government in exile" which is announced outside Belarusian borders, since there is a legitimate Government provided for by the Constitution.

The third lesson was learned by Russia, which after a few days of heavy silence and politico-media enthusiasm despite the congratulations offered by Putin to Lukashenko, clarified its official position during a telephone call between the two Presidents who together declared that they were certain that the situation would be resolved soon and that they would do everything to ensure that the destructive forces did not use these movements to undermine cooperation between Russia and Belarus. Russia has not only condemned the protests, but according to Lukashenko, Putin has pledged his help to ensure national security if it is found to be necessary.

On the media front, we talked about the role played by the Poland-based media Nexta in the media construction and organization of crowd movements in Belarus. Two days ago, the Belarusian Interior Ministry opened a criminal investigation against its founder Stepan Putilo for organizing a mass movement. Yesterday Russia officially issued an arrest warrant against him.

 
Ukraine actively participates in destabilizing the situation in Belarus
08/18/2020
Concurring information on Ukraine's involvement in the arrest of 33 Russians in Belarus, and in the destabilization of the situation in Minsk is appearing in the media, including Ukrainians. Some of this information confirms that it is indeed the SBU which is at the origin of the operation which led to the arrest of several of the Russians at the end of July 2020. Others show that the National Corpus, but also of former Ukrainian soldiers are sent to Belarus by Ukraine to organize a color revolution there.

SBU involved in arrest of 33 Russians and suspicion of treason at the highest level of state
Recall of facts. On the night of July 29, 2020, 33 Russians were arrested in Belarus and accused by the Minsk authorities of wanting to destabilize the situation during the presidential election. Ukraine then requested the extradition of a number of them, who took part in the war in Donbass on the RPD-RPL side (People's Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk) while they still had Ukrainian nationality. .

But on August 6, the Russian media outlet Komsomolskaya Prava revealed that it was the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) which had mounted this operation thanks to the false recruitment of mercenaries to go and protect oil installations in Venezuela. The aim seemed to be both to sow discord between Russia and Belarus, but also to recover men Ukraine could accuse of being involved in the MH17 crash.

Indeed, among the questions asked during the bogus "recruitment" of these mercenaries, they were asked if they knew how to operate a BUK system. The same anti-aircraft defense system the official investigation finds to be the one that brought down MH17!

The attempt to bring new defendants to the Dutch court is confirmed by Ukrainian media, which have revealed all the details of the case, with Censor.net in mind.

In an article published today, Yury Butusov recounts the SBU's plan to get hold of 28 of the 33 Russians arrested, thanks to its sources in the Ukrainian security services.

The aim was to recover 28 of the arrested men, so I quote "to do justice and to re-fill the 'swap stock' for the prisoner exchange" which is allegedly blocked by Russia. Clearly, Ukraine was seeking, through this operation in Belarus, to obtain 28 hostages that it could cash against its soldiers, spies and terrorists detained in the DPR, LPR and Russia! As a reminder, this kind of method (hostage taking) is typical of terrorist organizations, proving if there was still a need for it that Ukraine has indeed become a terrorist state!
And of the 28 sought by Ukraine, two were for their alleged involvement in the MH17 crash! This information published by Censor.net confirms my intuition at the beginning of August. If the "recruiters" asked them if they knew how to operate a BUK system, it was to spot those they might accuse of having shot down MH17!

Why seek to bring new defendants into this case? For several reasons. The first is that the official investigation is taking water on all sides, Titanic style. Worse, the falsification of the "evidence" provided by Ukraine (and especially the SBU) to the investigation team and to the Dutch justice system is increasingly coming to light thanks to the work of several journalists and bloggers such as Anatoly Chary, Max van der Werff, and the Bonanza Media team. The same goes for the “evidence” provided by the Bellingcat group.

So the SBU tries to restore its image somewhat tarnished by all its falsifications by bringing in new suspects, and enough to make a new anti-Russian rebound in this affair already more than saturated with sickly Russophobia.

But then the plan unveiled by Censor.net diverges from that exposed by KP. According to reports from Butusov's sources, the goal was not initially to obtain extradition from Belarus, but to arrest the Russians directly in Ukraine.
How? 'Or' What ? With the help of SBU agents who were to take the same flight as the Russians on July 25. One of them had to pretend to have a serious and urgent health problem, and the others had to play accomplices by pretending to be doctors or other medical personnel, and assure the crew that it was necessary to land the most. quickly possible, ie in Kiev! Once the plane landed in Ukraine, the Russians were reportedly arrested and forcibly released.

Except that the plan did not go as planned, if we are to believe Butusov.

On July 24, the day before the operation was concluded, the head of the main intelligence department of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry, Vassily Bourba (the same one cited by Prozorov in the MH17 affair), and the first vice -Director of the SBU, Rouslan Baranestki, come to report to Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian President, on the progress of the final phase of the operation.

During the meeting, Andrei Ermak, Zelensky's chief of staff, the first deputy secretary of the National Security and Defense Council (CSND), Rouslan Demtchenko, the deputy head of the presidential cabinet in charge of defense affairs, Roman Machovets and Zelensky's secretary, Maria Levchenko, also attended the meeting
And during the meeting, patatras, Ermak announces that the operation must be postponed, because he is in the midst of negotiations with Dmitri Kozak, Vladimir Putin's adviser regarding the implementation of the reinforced truce on July 27, and a future exchange of prisoners (after Ukrainskaya Pravda).

Despite recriminations from intelligence chiefs, who fear that this will completely derail the operation, Zelensky supports Ermak and orders the SBU and the intelligence service of the Ministry of Defense to postpone the operation until July 30. , in order to have time to conduct negotiations with Russia.

The rest you know, the Russians go to a sanatorium to wait for their new flight to Istanbul, but on the night of July 29 the Belarusian KGB arrested them. On July 31, the Ukrainian Attorney General requested their extradition, but on August 6 the rose pot was discovered, and on August 7, Vladimir Putin spoke with Alexander Lukashenko by telephone and settled the matter. A week later, 32 of the 33 Russians were repatriated to Russia. The last one also having a Belarusian passport, he stayed in Belarus.

Meanwhile in Ukraine, this failure is causing a stir. According to Censor.net, on August 3, Zelensky sets up another meeting with the same people as on July 24. Bourba screams treason, saying that someone leaked information, causing the operation to fail. He demands that everyone present be checked.

A request that was not to the liking of Zelensky who fired him two days later without warning, by a simple decree, replacing him with Kirill Budanov. And no investigation into the reasons for the failure of this costly, year-long operation has been launched.

For Butoussov, the information leak came from Ukraine and not from Russia (he bases himself for this on the inaccuracies of the information that the FSB had, and the reaction of the Belarusian KGB), and that the aim was to 'attract the attention of the Minsk secret services in order to derail the entire operation. He even believes that it comes from circles close to Zelensky, even the President of Ukraine himself.

Butusov demands that the SBU pass the lie detector test on all those close to Zelensky and on the President himself, and that he open a high treason investigation! He also demands that Demchenko, accused of being too "pro-Russian" be fired by Zelensky, and that the Rada launch a commission to monitor the SBU's investigation into the information leaks.

In his conclusion, he even calls on the Ukrainian people to mobilize if Zelensky does not do as he asks.
Ukraine is also involved in the destabilization of the situation in Belarus
The problem for Butusov is that information leaks are in fact rife, and increasingly show that Ukraine has embarked on a massive operation to destabilize Belarus.

First, the presence of Ukrainians, and among other Ukrainian neo-Nazis, has been proven, among other things, by the discovery on some of the arrested people of visiting cards bearing the effigy of Stepan Bandera (the Ukrainian collaborator of the Nazis made a national hero in Ukraine), and card holders featuring the SBU logo.


Mais aussi par les aveux mêmes de Dmitro Iaroch (ancien chef de Secteur Droit, une organisation néo-nazie), qui a écrit sur son mur Facebook, que depuis 2000 l’OUN (organisation qui avait collaboré avec les nazis) a travaillé en Biélorussie afin de « former » et conseiller les nationalistes (comprendre néo-nazis) biélorusses, avant de les encourager à renverser Loukachenko, comme les Ukrainiens l’ont fait avec Ianoukovitch. En clair, l’Ukraine a formé les néo-nazis biélorusses à l’organisation d’une révolution de couleur.

Et si pour vous cela ne semble pas assez officiel comme implication de l’Ukraine dans la déstabilisation de la Biélorussie, les informations obtenues par l’ancien député ukrainien Alexeï Jouravko sur l’implication directe du SBU dans l’arrivée d’activistes ukrainiens en Biélorussie devraient vous convaincre.

Jouravko a en effet publié les photos d’un document émanant du SBU (quand je vous disais qu’il y a des fuites d’information partout en Ukraine), dans lequel les services secrets ukrainiens ont aidé des activistes ukrainiens à se rendre en Biélorussie via la Pologne pour déstabiliser la situation à Minsk.


In it, the SBU explains that a group of Ukrainian activists (traveling in three rented buses) was stranded for several hours at the border with Poland, which they were finally able to pass, but still have could not get to their final destination.

The SBU says it supports the activities of this group of activists through their agent nicknamed "Moudrik", regarding what they call the object "900" (which appears to be Belarus in view of the activities mentioned). The SBU seems concerned that for the moment the final "organizers" have not yet made the decision to cross the border between Poland and the territory of Belarus, and that Warsaw may not be from agreement to let them pass.

Jouravko also confirmed an information published by the popular militia of the DPR, according to which the National Corpus (Ukrainian neo-Nazi organization resulting from the Azov regiment), recruits soldiers or former Ukrainian soldiers between 25 and 35 years old, experience of operations soldiers, and originating from the North of Ukraine or who speak the Belarusian language, to send them to participate in the demonstrations in Belarus! The proposed salary is attractive: between 45 and 80,000 hryvnias (between 1,380 and 2,450 euros).

Clearly, Ukraine is turning into a proxy for the West to lead a color revolution in Belarus. Kiev's involvement in what is happening in Minsk is now evident, and Lukashenko would do well to extradite all foreigners who came to destabilize the situation in Belarus, if he is to prevent the situation from escalating further.
The Belarusian President's "multi-vector" approach has just crashed into reality. The West does not want to help Belarus, it wants to destroy and plunder it as it did with Ukraine, and the latter as a good servile slave does not hesitate to lend a hand to its masters to sow chaos at his neighbor.

Christelle Nil
 
Belarus: Lukashenko resists and announces Russian support
Ukraine actively participates in destabilizing the situation in Belarus


@susy7, Keit asked you above to put your articles in quotes. She also asked you not to post entire articles but only relevant parts of them, no more than a few lines in summary. We have SOTT for lengthy news updates, the forum has a different purpose.

Despite being asked to change your style you have just posted a few more lengthy articles not in quotes. Why is that?

Here's Keit's post again for you:

Also, a suggestion for next time, is to put the text in quotes, or to quote only the relevant parts along with your own comments. It's harder and more time consuming to read the entire article without knowing what exactly you are trying to point out. :-)

Also, please always include a commentary in your own words, not just a copied-and-pasted article. There is a thread here on the forum where members agreed we find lengthy articles non-engaging and not helpful, so please be externally considerate and give us what we ask for.

Here's the thread: https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/improving-the-forum-experience-for-users.47879/

You can start reading from this post where the conversation turned to posting of lengthy articles being boring and rarely (if ever) read by others:

As far as content, my only minor gripe is when members post full articles from SOTT - links are OK, but aren't we supposed to be keeping up with it anyway? And as far as blanketing the forum with lengthy news updates, I think links and a BRIEF summary should suffice. Just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
@susy7, Keit asked you above to put your articles in quotes. She also asked you not to post entire articles but only relevant parts of them, no more than a few lines in summary. We have SOTT for lengthy news updates, the forum has a different purpose.

Despite being asked to change your style you have just posted a few more lengthy articles not in quotes. Why is that?



Also, please always include a commentary in your own words, not just a copied-and-pasted article. There is a thread here on the forum where members agreed we find lengthy articles non-engaging and not helpful, so please be externally considerate and give us what we ask for.

Here's the thread: https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/improving-the-forum-experience-for-users.47879/

You can start reading from this post where the conversation turned to posting of lengthy articles:
The text has not yet been translated into English
 
The text has not yet been translated into English

So what? Surely you read those articles in whatever language they're written before you post them? Simply pick the most important parts to create a summary and only post those. I don't see why you can't post small selected sections instead of the whole article.

And how does the fact that the text has not been translated prevent you from putting the posted text in quotes on the forum?

Also, you replied within minutes of me posting the above feedback, which means you did not read the thread I shared above where forum members expressed their preference for others' posting style. It is very important you get yourself familiar with it so here it is again for you: https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/improving-the-forum-experience-for-users.47879/
 
Back
Top Bottom