Q: (L) Well, cool! I would like to know if you could comment
on what we were discussing earlier, the purported idea of
mans' destruction of the planet. This is, of course, a
disturbing aspect of mankind, but I wonder if mankind is
as guilty as he is made to feel?
A: Mankind, so called, is one element of creation.
Q: (L) When you say 'one element of creation' in relation to
the question about man's destruction of the planet, are
you saying that this so-called destruction can, in a
sense, be considered to be creative?
A: The "destruction" is merely one segment of all that exists
in a long wave cycle.
Q: (T) Basically, man is doing what he is supposed to be
doing, whether we know it or not. One thought is,
regarding crop circles, is that even hoaxed crop circles
are what they are supposed to be. I mean, do little balls
of light do it, or does the Universe get Doug and Dave to
go out there and do it? It's still a crop circle, it's
still there for some reason. (L) Now, one question that
we were discussing earlier is: how can the close approach
of the companion star cause an increase in the Sun's
gravity when there is no reason why it should change
anything since gravity is a function of mass?
A: But do you rally know all there is to know about gravity?
Q: (A) No, we don't know. But, does this mean that this will
be an effect that does not follow from the theory of
gravity that we know already?
A: Gravity is the life force that binds all realities as one.
Q: (L) What are the mechanics of the increase in the Sun's
gravity? What is going to cause this?
A: In order to understand this, you would need a reworking of
the theorem.
Q: (L) Can you help us in this reworking of the theorem?
A: Waves.
Q: (A) What I want to ask is: we have Einstein's theory of
gravity, and the question is whether the effect of
increasing the Sun's gravity is something that goes beyond
Einstein's equations or not?
A: You must see the wave.
Q: (A) What wave, a gravitational wave, or an electromagnetic
wave, or some other wave? What wave?
A: Arkadiusz, how do these intersect?
Q: (A) Gravity and electromagnetic?
A: Yes. And others.
Q: (A) How they are described within a theory, or how they
intersect in space when they come together?
A: Both.
Q: (A) Okay, why does this increase in the Sun's gravity have
anything to do with electromagnetism? We were told that
the Brown star will not radiate any radiation, so, in
particular, no electromagnetic radiation. So, where does
electromagnetics come in? I do not understand...
A: Gravitational pull incites electromagnetic impulse.
Q: (A) Okay, that means we go beyond gravitational theory,
and this is part of Unified Field Theory?
A: Yes, exactly!! The complete UFT was withheld from you!
Q: (L) I think they mean humanity in general...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, the complete UFT is known to someone here on the
planet?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And they are not making it available...
A: Oh no, because "The Truth Will Set You Free!"
Q: (J) From gravity!
A: You may access hyperspatial truths with UFT.
Q: (A) Is it a good time for me to know more on that, to work
on that? Can you give me a pointer so that I can discover
it for myself?
A: Back up to where you were in "69."
Q: (T) You must have been looking into something in 1969...
you were a young'n then and didn't know you had stumbled
onto something. (A) I was reading books by Lichnerowicz
on UFT...
A: Yes. Check the notes.
Q: (L) Well, we have a REAL problem with these notes and
papers and things because of the fact that the bags that
they were packed in have disappeared!
A: Gee, we wonder why?!?
Q: (L) If we make a stink about these bags, will we get them
back?
A: No. Wait to see if they arrive.
Q: (L) We have been waiting a year! Well, there was a lot of
stuff for them to go through... we'll have to wait awhile!
A: Even without notes, the lonely young man walks down the
concrete walk with the clumsily arranged light poles,
contemplating the truth, the REAL truth. You were in an
alpha state, a crossroads, wondering "where do I go from
here?" "And why are all these things being pushed onto
me?" Go back to then, Arkady. You know you are really a
"Russian" at heart!
Q: (A) Well, we started with the increased mass of the Sun,
and we came to UFT which is hidden from us because it
would make us free; there is this tendency in me to follow
this road because it is science and would open a new road.
The question is whether such activity or knowing such
things will lead to other densities? Is it just for
satisfaction, or is there real value in knowing more in
this direction?
A: Well, the Unified Field Theory unlocks the door completely
to the higher densities.
Q: (T) But there are parts of this that have yet to be
discovered by the general research books because it is
being kept secret?
A: No.
Q: (T) Has science acknowledged that gravity is a wave, as
something that can be measured, quantitative?
A: Controversy.
Q: (L) What gravity is and what it is not is a controversy.
(T) But if gravity is part of the UFT, and somebody knows
what it is... (L) They are building HAARP. (T) I think
there is more to it than this HAARP. UFT is a major
step...
A: Grids.
Q: (L) What kind of grids... (T) They keep jumping off...
wait a minute...
A: We are not "jumping off."
Q: (L) What kind of grids?
A: The planet has been enshrouded with EM grid.
Q: (T) Are these the ley lines?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are they artificially generated?
A: Contoured.
Q: (L) They are artificially contoured. What is the result
of this shrouding?
A: Manipulated for use by 3rd/4th Consortium.
Q: (A) What kind of EM grid? (L) The natural EM grid is
being contoured...
A: Like a gently waving geometric "blanket."
Q: (T) Is it on the surface of the planet, through the
planet, or where?
A: Above.
Q: (J) Do microwave towers factor into this?
A: Indirectly discovered by same principal. [person?]
Q: (A) Who is this principal? A name? (T) The gravity
waves, whether they exist or not, are a controversy, yet
they are part of the UFT, and someone already knows how it
works. Therefore, it is only controversy to those who
don't know what the answer is, and it is not a controversy
to those who know. They know what it is and how to
measure it and how to use it.
A: Of course.
Q: (T) So, it is only a controversy that is allowed to be.
(L) Or created. (A) Some power is used to sustain this
grid. What is it?
A: Land and space based generators.
Q: (T) What can it be used for?
A: Multiple uses.
Q: (L) Well, what are the top three, for example?
A: No "top three."
Q: (T) Just an example, give us an idea? How does this
affect us?
A: Broaden concept.
Q: (T) Can this grid be used by other objects as a power
source? (J) Can it be tapped into?
A: Net.
Q: (L) It is a net that traps things?
A: Broaden.
Q: (L) It is a net that...
A: Calculates...
Q: (J) Internet? (T) Is it like a big fence to keep us in?
A: You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. "Alice
likes to go through the looking glass" at the Crystal
Palace. Atlantean reincarnation surge brings on the urge
to have a repeat performance.
Q: (T) The Atlanteans who have reincarnated are getting ready
to do the same thing they did before with the crystals.
So, this is an Atlantean type thing that is being done
now? Different equipment, but the same type of thing?
A: All lessons must be learned before you can move onto
bigger and better things.
Q: (L) Is that a general statement about the Atlanteans
repeating the lessons, or that once we learn this lesson,
we can move onto bigger and better things in counteracting
this grid?
A: All that is present and future too.
Q: (T) Well, maybe it is a defensive shield that has been put
up to protect us since we have monkeyed with the ozone so
much...
A: No. Better to contemplate and meditate. No linear
thinking please, you know better.
Q: (J) I think they just slapped your hand. (A) I want to
ask if there is something that we can and should do about
this grid for ourselves?
A: Why? To know was all you need.
Q: (A) Well, it was said that this was for the purpose of
control and manipulation. So, knowing is all that we
need. Or, we could try to shield... (L) But, to know IS
the shield. I don't know how that works, but it seems to
be so.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, how did we come to this grid from UFT?
A: Grid construction represents application of...
Q: (L) Somehow we went from the increased gravity of the Sun,
to UFT, to the grid...
A: UFT explains the "increased" gravity of Sol. But, is
there not something in UFT about increase/decrease???
Q: (A) There is no reason for it to increase or decrease...
but this is Einstein's theory which we were told is
incorrect... (L) Well, maybe it is speed? When two things
are rotating in tandem, when they come together, wouldn't
it increase their speed, and doesn't speed increase
gravity? (A) No, we were told that there is some
interaction between gravity and EM wave, and this is what
UFT is about... If we use other dimensions which we are
supposed to use in this UFT, going with Kaluza-Klein, then
the very concept of mass is something which is not so
clear, and mass can be variable...
A: Yes, variability of physicality.
Q: (T) Fourth density. (A) We were told earlier that this
UFT opens the door to other densities...
A: Yes.
Q: (A) And, some time ago Santilli was here and he had his
own idea about UFT; gravity and anti-gravity, and he was
told that he had a good idea of UFT, but that he only has
one seventh of the equation. I don't understand why UFT
has to go to other densities? Does it follow, or is it
necessary once we have UFT, that the other densities will
become clear in that they are necessary? How is it?
A: Fragmented inquiry.
Q: (A) Can we have a UFT which unifies EM and gravity and
does not include the concept of other densities. In other
words, can we put in a textbook all about the gravity and
electromagnetics, and a student could learn all of this
and still know nothing about other densities?
A: No. Other densities become apparent when...
Q: (A) So, it means that Einstein and Von Neumann knew about
these other densities?
A: Yes, oh yes!!!
Q: (T) Just a thought: having UFT and being able to
manipulate different fields within it, creates different
effects. So, as we understand it in the apparent present
state of science, we have to spin something in space in
order to create gravity. But, with the UFT, one small
offshoot is that one could create real gravity without
spinning anything. So, the problem of weightlessness is
really already solved...
A: Elementary my dear Terry, elementary.
Q: (T) So, this whole thing with the space station and all
the trouble they are having readapting to gravity when
they come back, is all a game...
A: When you "let the cat out of the bag," you create an
entire feline "nation."
Q: (T) So, we are capable of "Star Trek" right now?
A: In a sense, but there is so much more than that.
Q: (T) Of course. Most people would say that 'cutting edge'
science is 25 years ahead of what we see, and I say it is
more like a hundred years, and I am even off? Cutting
edge science on this planet is more like 3 or 4 hundred
years ahead?
A: More like 30 to 40,000 years "ahead!"
Q: (L) Is that because of 4th density influence and
information?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) 30 to 40 thousand years? Let me get that number
right...
A: Yes, at least.
