Thanks.

Regarding points above:
  • Can the universities position of being a federal contractor be challenged, at least as it applies to you?
I doubt it. This requirement does not apply to the individual source of funding (and mine is a private foundation), but to the institute as a whole. As an aside, it was darkly amusing to read in the email that the university receives $300 million per year in federal funding, and therefore they own our bodies. The very definition of chattel slavery.
  • Can you speak to an employment lawyer to understand your rights?
Maybe.
  • Could you use the fact that you had covid to make your case?
It's possible I could use that to seek a medical exemption, but it seems like a long shot.
  • Is it possible to find out who the other 10% are so you can combine efforts?
This occurred to me too. Unfortunately I've no idea where to even start. It's a big institute, so there are presumably hundreds of us, but we're scattered across a large number of departments and in the usual way in which academics are cloistered in their silos, we barely know anyone.
  • Quite extreme this one, can you transfer to a university elsewhere e.g. Texas or some other state where the political climate is such that you are unlikely to face a gene editing mandate?
My current position is not transferrable in this fashion. I'm anyhow in the process of applying for a new job, so this is a consideration; but such a position would not start until about a year from now. Luckily I've saved quite a bit over the last two years, so I can probably live off of my savings for some time if need be.

In any case, I'm not terribly worried. I'm furious that they're doing this, of course. Two days ago, when the department head sent around a heads up that this was coming (just over a day before the official announcement - he did the same thing before the lockdown), I got so angry that I was unable to continue working for the rest of the day.

However, over the last several months I've pondered this issue deeply and often, and the one thing I do know is that no matter what, I'm not getting the shot. If that means unemployment, or even the end of my career, so be it. I've long since made my peace with that possibility. This is a war, and it behooves a soldier to accept the possibility that he might become a casualty of that war, and to move forward regardless.

If it does come down to unemployment I've no real idea what happens next. Which is scary, I admit, but also somewhat thrilling.

I'd explore the red highlighted bit some more personally. How many organisations get government funding and how many will outright mandate the vaccine for ALL employees even those not working on anything related with the government? I don't know, to me this looks quite ambiguous. I'd ask an employment lawyer if I was to speak with one.

On the black bolded bit, I'm of the same stance. I'm braced currently to see where the critical impact will occur that will have one's back against the wall. Boris is yet to go full Macron but he's a psycho so I expect something is being cooked up to be unleashed at a time of his convenience.
 
Beate Bahner who in Germany went against the lockdown measures in the beginning, before she dropped it or was stopped, came back with a book written with a few others:
Corona-Impfung: Was Ärzte und Patienten unbedingt wissen sollten
Beate Bahner (Autor, Erzähler), Sucharit Bhakdi (Autor), Karina Reiß (Autor), Markus Böker (Erzähler), Eve Lamell (Erzähler), from ABOD Verlag (Verlag)
Epoch Times has an article and interview with her in German. Below is a translation of the article:
BOOKS
INTERVIEW WITH BEATE BAHNER
"Corona vaccination - What doctors and patients really need to know"
Epoch Times8. Oct. 2021 Updated: Oct. 9, 2021 4:26 a.m.
[...]
There are numerous question marks hovering over the societal vaccination fever. There are many question marks, but there are too few asking the questions that should be asked urgently in light of this mass medical experiment.

On 21 September the book of the specialist lawyer for medicine right, Beate Bahner appeared in the Rubikon publishing house. It is entitled: "Corona vaccinations: What doctors and patients should absolutely know". In the new work, many questions in this context are dealt with in detail.

In an interview with Epoch Times, Bahner talks about the increasing pressure to vaccinate, how existing law is continually being carelessly thrown overboard, and that there are more alternatives than one might think to avoid compulsion.

The pressure on the unvaccinated is steadily increasing. For a long time now, it has not been "just" participation in recreational activities that the unvaccinated are deprived of. Now it's down to the wire. Terminations are not infrequently threatened when employees refuse to undergo vaccination. Increasingly, people are bowing to pressure and getting vaccinated.

Beate Bahner explains that such a practice, in all its monstrosity, is not legal. Accordingly, vaccinating physicians can also face legal consequences. Bahner describes all this in her new book. She also discusses historical events such as the thalidomide scandal and the resulting Therapeutic Products Advertising Act, which makes it a punishable offense to advertise a medical product whose efficacy has not been proven.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
The video can be found on the site. I couldn't embed it, but the link is:
 
Progress


U.S. District Judge David Hurd in Albany, New York, ruled that the state's workplace vaccination requirement conflicted with healthcare workers' federally protected right to seek religious accommodations from their employers.

The ruling provides a test case as vaccine mandate opponents gear up to fight plans by President Joe Biden's administration to extend COVID-19 inoculation requirements to tens of millions of unvaccinated Americans.



Villanueva recently said he wouldn’t enforce the mandate impacting all county employees because “I don’t want to be in a position to lose 5, 10 percent of my workforce overnight.

He told Carlson, “I believe in the vaccine, I believe in the science, but if someone else who is an employee does not believe in that, who am I to impose on them my belief system?”

Villanueva accused the Board of Supervisors of “embracing this woke alternate universe” where they “send off edicts like Moses coming down from the mountains.”

“I have to deal in reality, and that is a very dangerous and nonsensical mandate,” he added.


CHICAGO (AP) — The head of the Chicago police officers union has called on its members to defy the city’s requirement to report their COVID-19 vaccination status by Friday or be placed on unpaid leave.

Catanzara suggested that if the city does enforce its requirement and many union members refuse to comply with it, “It’s safe to say that the city of Chicago will have a police force at 50% or less for this weekend coming up.”

He said that although he has made clear his vaccine status, “I do not believe the city has the authority to mandate that to anybody, let alone that information about your medical history.”

In the video, Catanzara instructs officers to file for exemptions to receiving the vaccine but to not enter that information into the city’s vaccine portal.

During a news conference Wednesday, Lightfoot accused Catanzara of spreading false information and dismissed most of his statements as “untrue or patently false.” She said COVID-19 vaccines are proven to be effective and that getting vaccinated would protect city workers and their families.
 
From Natural News:

You are free to say no to getting vaccinated​

In an article published by the Global Research, Paul Craig Roberts writes that Biden cannot issue laws or edicts like a vaccine mandate.

Orders like this from the White House would be struck down by federal courts. Congress is the source of law and even if it passes a vaccine mandate signed by Biden, if the courts follow the Constitution the law would be struck down.

Roberts emphasizes that any mandate or law that violates informed consent is a violation of the Nuremberg laws. The same laws were used to execute members of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party after World War II for violating informed consent while conducting their horrendous medical experiments.

Biden’s “mandate” is just a press release statement used to convince private employers to do what he is unable to do as president: Issue vaccine mandates to employees. There’s also the fact that private employers have no legislative power and no legal authority to violate the Nuremberg laws.

The president’s vaccine mandate is just another hoax supported by mainstream media to convince the public that it must be obeyed at all costs.

“When your employer tells you, whether you are a nurse or a software engineer or Walmart cashier, that you must accept what is without doubt a dangerous injection or be fired, sue him when he fires you,” Roberts writes.

Note that all fired employees can join a master civil lawsuit that can possibly bankrupt money-hungry employers who are breaking U.S. and international laws.

If employers go ahead and fire workers who simply wish not to get vaccinated, businesses will be in trouble. If the federal courts abandon the Constitution, U.S. law, international law and the people they serve, there’s no telling what will happen.

Go to Pandemic.news to learn more about oppressive mandates and how you can fight back.
 
Starting December 1st, Costa Rica will require the COVID-19 vaccine in order to enter most commercial centers and to participate in public activities: restaurantes, bars, casinos, museums, gyms, hotels, sites of worship and sporting events. Essential services like pharmacies or supermarkets are not included ( just yet).
Vaccine status will be verified by a digital form or mobile QR application. The president said “as off December 1 st, there will be no excuse”.
Also, as tomorrow October 15th all public sector employees will be required to be vaccinated. Private employers can also obligate their employees to be vaccinated.
Costa Rica is administering Pfizer and AstraZeneca versions of the poison and we are at 41% of population fully vaccinated, which correspond to 2.4M ( Costa Rica has around 5M population)
So I guess time has come. I am so adamant to take it but the circle is getting smaller and smaller. My husband panicked last April after his mom and older brother got COVID and shared their experiences with him, it was like if a switch turn on and He entered something I can only describe as panic mode: He took a plane and flew to California ( where they live) and took the J&J even thought He was aware off all the lies, all the fake and data manipulation. Fear got him.
Now I am the only one in my circle. Sometimes I feel alone, scared and lately a pressing thought of “ I don’t belong here”.
Besides the stress that brings knowing that in any second someone you love might be the next breakthrough case. And yet I can only be grateful because my circumstances are the best ones someone can get given the times: my job is remote, I live in a secluded place near the rainforest where I have been working on my ( newly discovered) gardening skills and taking care of my husband and dogs.
I wish there were more like Us around here, but there is no resistance. At the beginning I remember some who tried to protest and were ridiculed, they became a meme and now people is afraid of being exposed. Everyone is compliant.Everyone is repeting the same slogans ( translated to Spanish, but the same slogans you hear in the rest of the word). The programming was successful.
 
The NSW Supreme Court hands down it's decision in the case against Brad Hazzard tomorrow, Oct 15th at 4pm. It will apparently be live streamed on it's YT channel, here.

I haven't seen any of the live streams from this case but hope I get home in time for this one.

Thanks for the link! I watched it. If I understood correctly, the challenge failed.. basically because people aren't technically being *forced* to have the injections, and because Hazzard's decisions were not found to be inconsistent with public health - The judge said it's not the Supreme Court's place to judge whether or not the "vaccines" are effective or safe, so because (according to the health ministry) they are, Hazzard's mandates are in the best interest of public health.

So basically a big cop-out... Like WHY isn't it the Supreme Court's place to decide whether a fact that a case hinges on is true or not, even if that fact is not the exact and only point of the case? (rhetorical question obvs)
 
SAS Scandinavian Airlines & Norwegian Airlines
ending face masks on flights within Scandinavia

(Norway, Sweden, Denmark)

I assume Iceland and Finland are not included in this ?

On a different note, the Swedish Health Authority also mentions that from 1 November 2021, fully vaccinated people do not have to get or perform any PCR tests, even if they have symptoms... It surely screws up the numbers, pushing it towards the unvaccinated (which is much raved about in the media here). The Swedish way is always a "funny-strange" one - a milder version in so many things compared to other countries, but not for a moment necessarily any different or more honest. Because if you scratch through the surface of things... it's pretty much the same principle prevailing here: deceptions and lies.

They (the authorities, politicians etc) just don't like to be in the face of people (like Canada, Australia, Italy and New Zealand being on the other end of the extremes).

🇺🇸 Facemask requirement to be lifted on flights within Scandinavia

Airlines SAS and Norwegian say that as of Monday (18 Oct 2021), passengers will no longer be required to wear face masks when traveling within Scandinavia, reports Swedish Radio Ekot.

- We operate in Sweden, Norway and Denmark, and now that all three countries have opened up to both travel and other activities and have stepped down restrictions, we no longer see a need to have facemask requirements on domestic flights and these flights between the Scandinavian countries, SAS press officer Freja Annamatz tells the radio.

On flights between the Scandinavian countries and the rest of the world, mouthguards will continue to be required.

🇸🇪 Munskyddskrav slopas på flyg inom Skandinavien

Flygbolagen SAS och Norwegian uppger att det från och med måndag inte längre krävs att passagerare bär munskydd vid resor inom Skandinavien, rapporterar Sveriges Radio Ekot.

– Vi är verksamma i Sverige, Norge och Danmark, och när nu alla tre länder har öppnat upp för både resor och annan verksamhet och trappat ner på restriktioner så ser vi inte längre ett behov av att ha munskyddskrav på inrikesflygningar och de här flygningarna mellan de skandinaviska länderna, säger SAS:s presschef Freja Annamatz till radion.

På flygningar mellan de skandinaviska länderna och övriga världen kommer det fortsatt att krävas munskydd.

Source: Newsticker at DN.se from 15 Oct 2021
 
It seems yet another part of "whats in the vaccine" had been patentet recently:

body-snatchers.jpg

This Pfizer patent application was approved August 31st, 2021, and is the very first patent that shows up in a list of over 18500 for the purpose of remote contact tracing of all vaccinated humans worldwide who will be or are now connected to the “internet of things" by a quantum link of pulsating microwave frequencies of 2.4 gHz or higher from cell towers and satellites directly to the graphene oxide held in the fatty tissues of all persons who’ve had the death-shot.

Further it reveals a system for contact tracking, rating and automatically "drugging" people. Further it can generate a unique ID by contact with a central server.


screeny.pngscreeny.png

Anyone in for some roast Lizard?​
 

Attachments

  • screeny.png
    screeny.png
    172 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
Sorry, couldnt Edit anymore:

Whereas "Vaccination according to the total score" can probably be replaced with any other action like disabling you completely from buying anything, create a warrant for you or preventing you from using any means of (controlled) transportation.

Not to mention you are easily identified if your not "vaccinated". Being close to one vaccinated person would probably be enough.
 
Last edited:
It seems yet another part of "whats in the vaccine" had been patentet recently:



Further it reveals a system for contact tracking, rating and automatically "drugging" people. Further it can generate a unique ID by contact with a central server.


View attachment 50380View attachment 50381

Anyone in for some roast Lizard?​
Well, I didn't find any information about graphene oxide in the patent, nor the frequencies used. 2.4GHz is one of the bands used by WiFi, so it might not be very useful for tracking someone in practice. Moreover, I couldn't link any of the inventors directly to the Pfizer. But yeah, in the context of how risky the clothshots are, "system and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen" seems to be like taken from dysthropic movie. Sick minds.
 
Back
Top Bottom