Not a fact in your country, yet. More than likely it will be, especially in 2020. Prepared to be vaccinated whether you like it or not.
PLEASE NOTE not all population in most countries will agree with this force vaccination proposal.Bill Gates and all around him have as their agenda to reduce world population and consolidate their position on the top for total world damination.
 
All this mention of Bill Gates' role in advancing mandatory vaccination and financing the WHO, reminded me of Ark's computer analogies in the Foreword of "Riding the Wave". I quote from the Kindle edition (positions 143-161), bold is mine:

Using our computer analogy: we can’t prevent hackers from hacking, but, what we can do is make every effort to prevent them from hacking into our systems by erecting barriers of knowledge and awareness. Hackers are always looking for an “easy hack”, (except for those few who really like a challenge), and will back away as you make your system more and more secure. How do you make your computer (or yourself) immune to hackers? It is never 100% secure, but if all preventative measures are taken, and we constantly observe for the signs of hackers – system disruption, loss of “memory”, or energy, damaged files, things that don’t “fit”, that are “out of context” – we can reduce the possibility of hacking. But, we can only do this if we are aware of hackers; if we know that they will attempt to break into our system in the guise of a “normal” file, or even an operating system or program that promises to “organize” our data for greater efficiency and ease of function or “user friendliness”, while at the same time, acting as a massive drain on our energy and resources – RAM and hard drive. As a humorous side note: we could think of Windows Operating system as the “ultimate hacker from the future” who, disguised as a sheep, is a wolf devouring our hard disk and RAM, and sending our files to God only knows where every time we connect via the internet! And of course, there are viruses. Whenever we insert a floppy disk or CD into our computer, we risk infection by viruses which can slowly or rapidly, distort or destroy all the information on our computer, prevent any peripheral functions, and even “wipe” the hard disk of all files to replace them with endless replications of the viral nonsense. The human analogy to this is the many religions and “belief” systems that have been “programmed” into our cultures, and our very lives, via endless “Prophet/God” programs, replacing, bit by bit, our own thinking with the “dogma and doctrines of the faith”. Enough of the computer analogies. I think that the reader can imagine any number of variations on the theme and come to an understanding of how vulnerable we are to “disinformation” in the guise of truth from either the future, the past, or the present.

Apart from the original context of explaining and introducing the process of the critical channeling we're familiar with, I guess the above excerpt really applies to our current predicament. IMO Ark was having a superluminal communication himself while writing it!
 
An update from Russia. While in the Russian regions the situation is more or less calm and some of the quarantine measures have been lifted, in Moscow the situation has rapidly worsened despite earlier positive expectations by the authorities.

For whatever reason, the number of daily hospitalizations of COVID19 patients has gone from 500 to 1,300 people per day, compared to last week And that despite of the closed borders and quarantine. Reportedly, the new patients' condition is serious. Now according to Moscow authorities, the city's hospitals are almost full. Starting from next week, they are planning to start hispitalising people in policlinics, turn them into hospitals.

For this reason, the Mayor of Moscow decided yesterday that the quarantine in Moscow will be strengthened for one week from 13 April to 19 April. During that week Moscow citizens may only leave their houses with a special permit.

For now, Russia has 11,917 confirmed cases of CV, and 94 people died. Most of these cases are in Moscow.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your update Siberia.I have been discussing with my spouse earlier that maybe Putin has decided to follow the WHO measures to appease the Deep State connection in Moscow.The reason being to allow him to gain the majority votes required for his Presidential leadership up to 2036.He may revert to his good old ways after this confirmation.
I thought Russia would be playing the role Sweden is currently playing.CNN has now gone to Sweden to turn up the heat on the Govt for not jumping on the Pandemic train.
 
Here is an interview with Valérie Bugault who pertinently analyzes the current situation. In view of what we know thanks to the Cassiopeans, everyone will be able to complete or even adjust some of her comments. I send the text as an attachment so that it's not modified by the automatic translator.
 

Attachments

  • Interview of Valérie Bugault.txt
    25.4 KB · Views: 52
This part stroke a cord with me:

The Law establishes a compensation system for abnormal reactions to vaccination. A recipient of an immunization program vaccine who dies or suffers significant disability or organ and tissue damage is to be paid from the vaccination funds of the provincial level government if the damage falls within the scope of abnormal reactions associated with a vaccine or cannot be prevented (art. 56).

I guess they are implying they have calculated the % and/or the cost will have to cover that collateral damage...

I think about this topic all the time and how it is connected to the future decisions that will be made.
Just for info. My son received growth hormones in 2005 and suddenly formed tumors. I was able to prove that he was healthy before starting hormone treatment, since he was completely examined in the hospital for 2 days, especially neurological and internistic. The tumors were formed 2 weeks after the start of therapy. After the first operation, it was said that it was not the therapy because it was safe. We then started hormone therapy again. Again tumor formation occurred within 2 weeks. I was talking to all the leading professors in Germany at the time and only one professor said: What do you think what growth hormones do? They also make something grow that you don't really want.
A long, sad story.
I was very angry because I made this decision and have never forgiven myself for the fact that my decision still affects my son's health to this day. There were many operations and restrictions for him. I then informed Pfizer and I also wanted to sue them through a law firm in Berlin. Pfizer replied to me: There is no indication that tumor formation is occurring from the therapy . The growth hormones are safe. Her son probably had a predisposition to form tumors. Prove that the growth hormones triggered the tumors.

And that was the end of the case. And that's the way it will go now. These are my biggest concerns. Any damage caused after vaccination will not be recognized. Since there is no long-term study of this vaccine, there is no evidence. Where there is no knowledge, the pharma can say with a clear conscience: the vaccination did not trigger the disease, the current study situation (there is none) is clear.

I am currently discussing vaccination very intensively with several people. If there is forced vaccination by the state, liability is completely different. Then you can blame the state, but it blames responsibility on the manufacturer. Therefore there will be no liability here. And I suspect that it will be a voluntarily forced vaccination in the sense:
If you want to travel, attend events, want a job, you can only do it with a vaccination. If you don't want all of this anymore, then you don't need a vaccination. So forced voluntariness. And there is no liability whatsoever between the state and pharmaceuticals.
 
Re: Zero Hedge - I, too, have always thought that they were controlled opposition. The fact that their reporters all post under the pseudonym, "Tyler Durden" - a character in the Brad Pitt film "Fight Club" which ends with the deliberate explosive destruction of banks, always made me question them and what they report. But knowing that some alt-news websites still post 90% truths, and also having learned MUCH from information left in the comments section by posters, I kept up with following them.

I found a little trick to learn who or from where the articles posted under "Tyler Durden" come from. This was when my old computer would run slowly from too many ads, flashy graphics and just being an old computer. If you use Firefox, look to the right of the box containing the url. You should see a little rectangle that looks like a page. Clicking on it will open the page into a simple view ("reader view"), no graphics or the surrounding article links etc. The author or source of the page will be visible. Below are some screenshots. The first image is the address box. The second is the page as normally viewed. The third is the reader view. I'm sure there's an equivalent in Chrome ("Simple"?), and in Safari and Opera. It's really handy for visually distracting web pages.


Capture2.JPG

Capture.JPG

Capture1.JPG
 
It's worth being aware that some people, maybe even most (?) will ignore information if they don't 'like' the source. The source then becomes their excuse to ignore it. They ask you to 'quote your sources' and because you don't go directly to source material (they want you to reinvent the wheel even better if you actually did the 'study'), they dismiss it because it comes from 'the wrong people'. Often, they just mean it's not from mainstream acceptable sources and that becomes the reason they reject it. I'm thinking of how my family and my work react and probably how a lot of people who ask for sources will respond!

Really interesting. I am constantly criticized for the sources. This source is uncertain, this source is conspiracy theory ... It is striking to me that all those who only ask the source question are very dominant people with a narrow world view. It is very striking to me that in my environment the medical people suddenly can no longer interpret their own long specialist knowledge correctly. The background is panic. I have never seen fear and panic cause the mind to collapse as it does today. It's actually like brainwashing. A friend of mine who is very long a nurse and is really very good professionally, who does everything perfectly, suddenly no longer knows her own immune system and its qualities. She has a seriously ill man, from whom 5 organs were removed years ago due to a false cancer diagnosis. He is a high-risk patient. She strongly condemns medicine and pharmaceuticals and tries everything with alternative medicine. I pointed out that it would be best for him to have his antibodies determined before deciding to vaccinate. She said everything was a lie with the antibody test that vaccination is the safest for antibody formation. And this whole naturopathy is not safe either. You should now rely on the state.

I got the boxes the day before yesterday for my 8 antibody test. Unfortunately it is Easter and the laboratory is closed. Our blood collection takes place on Tuesday. I swore to myself: If I can prove an immunity of over 50%, I will go public. In Germany you do not want evidence of herd protection - then I provide evidence that herd protection is also possible without anyone being seriously ill. I am really looking forward to the results.
 
After reading a few posts in this thread about how the comments on ZeroHedge have changed their tune, I went to the website and immediately saw this article at the top of the page:

Look At How Ridiculously Wrong All The COVID-19 Models Were
2020-04-10_8-39-33.jpg


The professional forecasters all projected that beds would be a multiple of the beds actually needed.

Notice not one model came in under the actual number.

These are all professional fearmongers who alarmed the country about a virus that appears to be in line with a severe flu season.

Can they really be that incompetent?

It seems that ZeroHedge itself has changed its tune too.
 
I understand that people do not want mandatory vaccinations. I also understand that there have been incremental changes to increase the rate of vaccinations, such as with children in school. I am impacted by such changes, and I react the best that I can to counter them.

What good does it do for me to tell people that mandatory vaccinations will happen? It has not happened. Do I know what will happen in the future? Is the future no longer open? Are any of us actually good at probabilities? Is it possible that I split to another reality where vaccines are not mandatory while you split to a different reality where vaccines are mandatory due to your insistent belief that mandatory vaccinations are highly likely or expected? What frequency or reality are we trying to anchor?

Back a few years ago I was told on this forum something to the effect that it was more likely I'd get struck by lightning than get a vaccine exemption, and I went out and got vaccine exemptions. So, no, I'm not going along with thinking it is likely that vaccines will be mandatory. I'm going to wait and see. I'm going to try to find a counter to existing mandates. I'd rather go non-anticipation rather than be certain that bad x, y, or z will happen. Maybe the universe will help if I'm open to the help instead of shutting down possibilities with expectations.
 

2/ Children, more than anyone else, suffer immediately from the lockdowns. They're denied school. They’re denied normal socializing with their friends. In many places they have even - bizarrely - been denied the chance to play outside.

3/ The stress even on healthy families is incredible. And for children in troubled families, the cost is far higher; for those kids, schools may well be the only chance they have to be seen every day by an adult who is not high or abusive.

4/ Of all the choices we’ve made, sacrificing the mental health of children at zero risk from this illness is the LEAST acceptable. But so many in the media are young and don’t have children, or perhaps are married couples with one child (an equation that makes care easier).

5/ At the very least, the media needs to STOP presenting a hugely misleading (to be polite - fictional would be more accurate) picture of the mortality risks associated with #COVID so that parents will let their kids play together outside. That would be a tiny step toward sanity.
 
This is why I'm trying to get together with people. Political Ponerology mentioned normal people getting together as a way to break the spell and stay normal.

I'm actually noticing this in people around me in Croatia. They are talking to each other and noticing that things aren't as presented by the MSM . Recently, my mother said the COVID-19 situation is complete propaganda, I wasn't expecting to hear something like that from her, and she definitely didn't come to such a conclusion by doing independent research, but only because she's talking to people who aren't buying into the lies completely. People are noticing that nobody they know is getting sick, they notice how ridiculous the media is with the fear-mongering about 80 or 90+ year olds dying and who had various illnesses to begin with. I don't think the PTB will be able to keep up with this nonsense for too long, even with all the propaganda and data manipulation. There is something called human nature, which they are completely ignoring, thinking they can remodel reality and the population as they wish.
 
Back
Top Bottom