|
|
In
between the "Demo" session in March of 1995, and the visit
of Dr. Santilli in May of the same year, there was another strange
concept that the Cassiopaeans introduced to us that relates, it seems,
to The Wave. I did not insert it in the chronological sequence because
I felt it would have distracted from the series of events that resulted
from our interactions with MUFON, but, in certain way, it connects
them - though the connection was only apparent in retrospect.
In
this session again, in an unusual way, the Cassiopaeans brought up
a matter which led us, step by step, into the idea they wanted us
to grasp and this time, Terry was the catalyst. I think it would be
better for you, the reader, to read it exactly as it happened without
any prior commentary, saving all that for afterward. I have put a
couple of remarks in bold type just so you might keep them in mind.
Q:
(L) Well, we were a little late getting started tonight...
A: Terry, was it October, 1964?
Q: (L) To what does this question refer?
A: Ask Terry! Lake, yellow brick and brown brick buildings, cool
day, fences, large cobalt colored cylinder, oscillating...
Q: (T) I would have been 14. I was a freshman... my father's cousin
had a place at Kuka lake and we used to go there and visit all the
time... fences? I don't remember anything. I'm sorry. I'm drawing
a blank.
A: Images we see... Now we see victorian houses, green gabled roof...
field... brown brick buildings...
Q: (T) October?
A: We asked you.
Q: (T) Dark blue? (J) Cobalt blue. (T) Dark blue, almost a black
color? (J) Cobalt is a bright blue.
A: Cobalt is metallic navy blue.
Q: (T) Well, my brother wasn't home... I know what you are talking
about! Yes, I did see something. I don't know if it was in October
of 1964, but I remember seeing it!
A: Okay, now we are getting somewhere... what do you think happened
to you that day?
Q: (T) I don't remember anything happening other than that I saw
the object; it came floating over the house and then floated off
in the other direction. I don't remember anything else happening.
I stood outside watched it come, watched it go; and I stood outside
and watched it for quite some time.
A: Neighborhood, what appearance?
Q: (T) It looked just like the neighborhood. It didn't seem any
different. I don't remember...
A: Describe...
Q: (T) There was a fifties development out on the edge of the city
limits of Rochester, surrounded by most of Kodak - out in that area
- most of Rochester; across the street was a field with a schoolyard
surrounded by a fence. A large, two-story brown school building,
brown, or red brick... that I went to grammar school in. I don't
know about yellow brick buildings, but our house was green at the
time and the next door neighbor's house was yellow at the time with
white fancy little trim stuff across the roof. It wasn't gabled,
but it looked gabled. There were little gables over the front doors
of most of the houses. The doors came out to the front and there
was a little peak. There was a stadium on the other side of the
school yard, a ways back for Aquinas football games; their stadium.
Some fields and one of the last remaining wooded areas that was
in the city limits that wasn't a park down the street... a set of
railroad tracks about five blocks to the East. The lake, lake Ontario,
Rochester is right up against it, we were about seven miles, eight
miles from there, maybe ten. I used to ride up there on my bike
and back... the neighborhood itself didn't look any different because
I watched the thing come in over the field. I remember my mother,
I don't know if my brother was there, but I remember my mother and
my neighbor. The neighbor woman was standing out on the front walk
talking and they called me because I was in the house watching TV.
I don't know if it was October though because it was still warm,
sunny. It came in from high over the West, over a field, by the
stadium, came down toward us, came right toward us. I thought it
was moving right at us. It didn't start moving right at us until
we were looking at it...
A: Was.
Q: (T) Yes. Was moving toward us. It seemed to change direction
when I came out and started looking at it. It went right over and...
A: Objective was you.
Q: (T) The objective was me? I don't think I was picked up at that
time.
A: Oh yeah?
Q: (T) Well there were people standing there...
A: Time "freezes" during abduction.
Q: (T) The object had the distinctive falling leaf motion to it
which I thought was an extremely odd thing for it to do. It came
right over the edge of the house on the side of the house, where,
sometime in later years, I had something happen to me when I was
in the basement. It was right over where I would have been sleeping...
A: Oscillating.
Q: (T) I thought it sure looked metallic and I wished I had a little
pellet gun and could pop a pellet at it; it wasn't more than about
50 feet up in the air. It was maybe 10 to 15 feet long and maybe
about 3 or 4 feet around. It looked like a weiner rounded on both
ends but not as fat; it was longer and thinner. (F) It looked like
a hotdog? (T) It looked metallic to me. It was smooth, perfectly
smooth. (L) What are we getting to here? This was obviously brought
up for a reason. If Terry was abducted...
A: Crossroads.
Q: (L) It was a crossroads in Terry's life?
A: And now... connection completed.
Q: (T) I'm not following this...
A: Access your recent dreams.
Q: (T) Recent dreams... I dreamed something about moving into a
building and I had something that had a power cord or something
that went outside... a connection of some kind... I don't remember
them... they are just very vivid. Could something have happened
to me just recently that started with that experience?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) It has to do with what we are doing here, but this isn't
the completed connection we are talking about?
A: Not exactly.
Q: (T) The connection that was completed was all about something
else?
A: Interrelated.
Q: (T) Does it have to do with my job?
A: In part.
Q: (T) Does it have to do with the fact that I am saying certain
things to people at work, or wherever I can, when I talk about events
that are happening these days and trying to raise their level of
thinking on these things?
A: Yes, now, let's explore your friends and relationships and experiences
in the years immediately following the event to see if we can "dig
up" something of startling significance!!!
Q: (T) Are we sure this is 1964 and not 1974?
A: Terry, you know better!
Q: (T) I'm just asking because that event and the event that happened
in winter with the voices outside the window and all the weirdness
that happened that night seemed to be a lot closer together and
that other event happened in the 70s, sometime. That was somewhere
close to my trip out to Arizona and the weirdness out there with
the car and all that.
A: Oh, there is sooooo much, isn't there Terry! It is time to divulge.
Q: (T) After high school. But, in those days I was mainly hanging
out with some people I met over at Edison. Tom ___, a lot of people
named Tom. I used to go to the lake and take drives around it at
night. We just used up gas. I felt comfortable because I did a lot
of things but most of the people I knew didn't get along with each
other. I still do this today, I have learned from hard experience
that I can't mix my friends. I learned at that time that every person
in any group had a counterpart in any other group. Groups may be
different, but they all have the same make-up, and I was always
"my" person in each of a number of groups. There was nobody in any
of the groups I hung out with that was like me; I was that individual
for several groups. Does it have to do with when I got my driver's
license and we all used to drive around a lot out in the country?
We drove all through the lakes area...
A: Some.
Q: (T) We used to drive all through the hills out there at night...
long drives. (L) Did something happen on one of these drives?
A: Maybe...
Q: (T) Does this have something to do with that bizarre town I came
across one night and never was able to find again? Is that tied
in here somehow?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Strangest town I have ever seen. Talk about David Lynch!
I was driving down through southwest New York one night. I was out
of high school. I used to get stoned then too, so a lot of my experiences
aren't dependable because I got stoned. I went through a town one
night down there in the Southern Tier, in the fingerlakes area,
and it was the strangest thing. I have been through all these little
towns, and there's usually people and stuff. Not a lot, but at least
somebody around. It was about nine or ten o'clock, and I went through
this town; it was two story buildings built right up to this two
lane main street, with a little narrow sidewalk, and it was like
driving into a canyon, and the buildings went straight up into the
air. There was a street light every so far, but they were those
little yellowish bulbs that don't cast much light on the street.
There was absolutely nobody out there. There was nobody in any of
the buildings, they were all boarded up and shut down. It looked
like a town but it didn't look like a town. It went about four blocks.
I came back out of it, turned around and drove through it again
because I didn't believe it. I could never find it again, and I
didn't know the name of it.
A: Discover.
Q: (S) It was the Twilight Zone... (T) Was this town...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You drove into another reality. (T) It wasn't really a town,
was it?
A: Nope.
Q: (T) It gave me the willies. And, I turned around and drove through
it a second time because I didn't believe it was there. (S) Were
you by yourself? (T) Yes, I was all alone. There was nobody with
me. One signal light that looked like it was out of the 1920s; old
street lamps... like a ghost town, literally. (L) What are you guys
trying to tell us here about Terry or through Terry? Was the recent,
connected event you mentioned private to Terry and happened in his
life only?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Each of my relationships then was with an individual who
thought for themselves, they understood things, they had their own
experiences that were different from most people, and knew that
most people could not relate or understand. It doesn't have to be
abduction experiences, but they have had life experiences...
A: Yes, but that is the sign of something more significant.
Q: (T) Is it the fact that I am able to form relationships with
vastly different types of individuals?
A: All originate from same "plane."
Q: (L) In other words, he formed relationships with others like
himself? And, did they all originate from the same plane, as in
somewhere else?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Did the ship we started off with have a lot to do with interacting
with all of these other people that Terry formed friendships and
relationships with subsequent to this time?
A: Yes, but not central issue.
Q: (T) Do we all share a common experience?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Do they all share a common origin?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what is that origin?
A: Neormm.
Q: (L) Neormm?
A: Closest English equivalent.
Q: (L) Is that a place?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where is it?
A: Check star guides.
Q: (T) Is this a star? All of us are from another star that I've
formed relationships like that with - the special ones that I would
consider lasting?
A: In perpendicular reality.
Q: (L) Alright! Where are we now? We have discovered that Terry
has a thing called a "Perpendicular Reality" that has
been running through his life and probably is an ongoing thing,
is this correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) What is a perpendicular reality?
A: Intersection is at realm border.
Q: (L) So, in other words, you could follow along in your mind to
the realm border because you have an intersecting reality with it.
Is that correct?
A: No.They merge.
Q: (L) Okay, we have discovered the significance of the fact that
Terry is part alien with a perpendicular alien reality that causes
him to interact with other people who also have these perpendicular
realities. What's the point? [Laughter] (S) Something to do! (J)
It's a hobby.
A: "Point" is 3rd density concept, and you need "refresher" course!
Q: (T) "Remedial Cassiopaean 101." (L) Well, I am just
trying to understand what this whole thing is all about. What are
we getting at here?
A: Then learn from what we communicate to you and what you already
have "locked up" inside of you, i.e. time to get the key!
Q: (L) What I think is, maybe everybody does this, right now on
the planet; there are always different groups that are forming connections
with other people with whom they share an alternate reality. (J)
In other words, we are all being attracted to each other? (F) Right.
That makes sense. (L) In which case, what alternate reality do we
share or do we share no alternate reality and is each person
a representative of an alternate reality different from each
other and are a connection point?
A: Latter concept is exactly correct!
Q: (T) We are what is common to each other in our group?
A: What did we say about increasing power?
Q: (L) Regarding "keys," I have heard the concept, written
or talked about, that certain people, or perhaps everybody, have
locked up inside themselves "pockets of energy," for lack
of a better term, or knowledge as in electromagnetic patterning
in their fields... and forming groups in this way would be...
A: Like putting together the pieces of the puzzle.
Q: (L) We are the pieces of the puzzle?
A: Draw on a piece of paper one perpendicular intersection.
Q: [We get paper and draw figure.] (L) Like that?
A: No, make it like an upside down "T"
Q: [Terry tries again] (L) Why don't you just draw it on the board
for us? [Clamps pencil next to planchette on piece of paper] Okay
guys, draw! [The planchette draws the figure which is an inner circle
surrounded by an outer circle, connected by seven spokes; rather
like a wagon wheel.]
Q: (J) Is this like a crop circle?
A: Has been done, yes. Designates union of perpendicular realities.
Q: (L) Was the town that Terry went through one of the perpendicular
reality towns?
A: Close. You need seven spokes.
Q: (L) There's that number seven again! Each person in the group
is a spoke?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there more to this concept that we are going to discover
as we go along?
A: Of course!
Q: (L) Once the seven spokes are in place in terms of persons, is
that going to increase our power/knowledge exponentially?
A: Explosively.
Q: (T) Okay, we have the image on the paper with seven spokes. What
do we do with it next?
A: Open. Will fall into place, now you must ponder the significance
and we must say goodnight!
When
reading back over this session with hindsight, it seems to me that
the "completed connection" the Cassiopaeans referred to
might have been the fact that Terry brought our little group together
with the MUFON group, which then led to the "Demo" session
at the second MUFON group, and subsequently, to the "Santilli
Session" which had significant repercussions later that were
unforeseen by us at the time. But, actually, I think that the hints
in this session really deserve deeper analysis, particularly regarding
the strange town, designated as "Neormm" by the Cassiopaeans.
This session is still a puzzle to me, and if anyone has any insights,
I will appreciate hearing them.
We
DID come back to the issue of "Perpendicular Realities"
a little later, and the subject was expanded in a very interesting
way:
06-17-95
Q:
(T) Several sessions back when we were discussing "Perpendicular Realities"
you were talking about something that happened to me and that I had
to look back over my life and analyze my relationships with other
people from a certain point up until now and you said that this was
a perpendicular reality. What is the definition of a perpendicular
reality?
A: The perpendicular reality primarily, though not exclusively, refers
to one's life path and how one's life path fits together in the cycle
or in a wheel when connected with those of a similar life path. If
you can picture an inlaid wheel formed by a circle within a circle,
and adjoining partitions in a perfect balance, that would be the best
representation of perpendicular reality for it does not completely
involve one individual's experience, but rather a group of individual's
experience for the progression of a greater purpose, if you understand
what we mean. This is what we mean when we say: "perpendicular
reality." Picture again, a circle within a circle adjoined by
equally spaced partitions in a perfect cycle. That is perpendicular
reality.
Q: (T) You had us draw this symbol and put seven spokes or partitions
between the two circles.
A: Correct.
Q: (T) Is seven the optimal number?
A: Seven is always the optimal number. There are seven levels of density.
This reflects through all phases of reality.
Q: (T) The people that I interacted with during this time, they also
have gone on to do other things that they were supposed to be doing
because of their interaction with me in this perpendicular reality
that we all existed in?
A: That's correct.
Q: (T) You also said that each of us in this group came from a different
perpendicular reality.
A: That is correct.
Q: (T) Is it at this point where we merge our different perpendicular
realities in order to learn from each other's experiences?
A: That could be described as correct.
Q: (L) It was said at the time that the inner circle was the connection
with this reality and that the outer circle and connecting segments
were where the perpendicular reality is "joined with The Wave." Is
it implied in that statement that the forming of this conduit through
these perpendicular realities is instrumental in bringing forth this
wave, bringing forth this change, this dimensional shift, or density
shift, and is that something that is being done in other places?
A: We wish to congratulate you for asking six questions in one. [(T)
One more question and you would have a perfect perpendicular question!]
Mirth!
Q: (L) Are we connected in some way with the Wave, individually and
as a group?
A: Well, of course. Everything is connected to the wave.
Q: (L) Are we, by connecting into this wheel, so to speak, activating
the wave in some way?
A: We are not clear about your interesting interpretation there, but
it is true that you have an interactive relationship with the wave...
However, as stated before, you are in an interactive relationship
with the wave in a sense, in that the wave is a part of your reality,
always has been and always will be. And, of course, it does involve
your progress through the grand cycle. And the perpendicular reality,
again is, of course, an advancement from the core outward which is
yet another reflection of all reality and all that exists. Now, we
wish to return to the visual representation as mentioned previously.
If you notice the core circle connects with all seven sections to
the outer circle. Now, picture that outer circle as being an ever
expanding circle, and each one of the seven segments as being an ever
expanding line. Of course, now, this will expand outward in a circular
or cyclical pattern. Please picture visually an expanding outer circle
and a non-expanding inner circle. Contemplate that and then please
give us your feelings as to what that represents.
Q: (L) Does it represent an expansion of our knowledge and consciousness?
A: That's part of it.
Q: (L) Does it represent also expanding influence of what and who
we are on that which is around us?
A: That is correct. Contemplate, if you will, the ever-expanding
outer circle and the non-expanding inner circle, and, of
course, the seven partitions also moving outwardly. What type of shape
does that form in your mind's eye?
Q: (L) A wheel?
A: Is that all?
Q: (T) A pie?
A: Keep going.
Q: (L) An eye.
A: Now we are starting to turn it into a sphere! Why would it turn
into a sphere?
Q: (L) How can it turn into a sphere?
A: How can it not!
Q: (SV) It is going in ALL directions, not just flat...
A: Is a straight line a straight line or a...
Q: (L) Oh, you're not talking about a circle?
A: We are talking about a circle. What becomes of a circle if you
expand it outward forever?
Q: (J) It disappears.
A: It disappears? How can it disappear? Where does it disappear to?
We ask you that, Jan? Jan?
Q: (J) Visually, as the outer circle expands, the inner circle becomes
smaller and smaller until it disappears. As you continue to expand
out with the outer circle, the inner circle disappears.
A: But where does it disappear to?
Q: (J) A black hole?
A: A black hole. Well, that's a possibility. But, we really didn't
want you to concentrate so heavily on the smaller circle, now did
we? It's the outer circle.
Q: (T) The outer circle is used to encompass more and more.
A: And what shape does it begin to take on? We want you to look at
this outer circle expanding outward!
Q: (J) Are we to assume that the seven spokes remain the same size
in relation to the circle?
A: Well, answer that question for yourself.
Q: (L) Okay, we are looking at it as a plane representation. As a
flat surface.
A: Well, what happens to a flat surface if you extend it outward forever?
Q: (L) Well, we don't know. That, that... (SV) It keeps on going.
A: It keeps on going?
Q: (L) Yeah, bigger and flatter!
A: It does? What happens to a line if you extend it forever and ever?
Q: (L and S) It keeps on going.
A: It does? Where does it go to?
Q: (SV) Forever. (J) Back to itself. (L) We don't know that.
A: Oh, someone said "Back to itself." And why don't we know that?
Q: (L) Because we don't. It is conjectured that space is curved...
A: "Because we don't know. Now, why don't we know?
Q: (L) Because we haven't been there.
A: Had Columbus been outside of Italy and Spain?
Q: (L) Well, of course Columbus had an idea that there was something
but he hadn't been there, no. But he went and checked it out.
A: Did he have just and idea?
Q: (L) Well, pretty much, I guess.
A: Hmmm. That's not the way we remember it. The way we remember it
is that he had instinct and imagination and when he married his instinct
with imagination, it became reality. And, when it became reality,
he had created a reality which he was fully confident would be manifest
in the physical third density reality. It wasn't that he was confident.
He knew it to be so. He didn't stop himself by adding prejudice to
the equation which is what you are doing when you say: "Well, we don't
know what happens because we have never been there!" Think logically,
please. We have told you so many times that everything is a grand
cycle. If it's a grand cycle, we have told you about circles within
circles. We have told you about cycles. We have told you about short
wave cycles and long wave cycles. Now, after all this information
that you have asked of us, which we have more than happily given to
you, would you expect that a straight line would just go out forever
and ever and ever as a straight line? How could it possibly do that?
What happens, if you take, on you third density earth, and you draw
a straight line to the East or to the West or to the North or to the
South...
Q: (J) It comes all the way back to itself.
A: Right...
Q: (L) Okay, so we're living in a big globe!
A: Are we?
Q: (L) Well, that is what it sounds like, a big circle?
A: Oh, my, my, my. You need more study and learning, my dear. Need
more study. Even your Albert Einstein had a theory about what happened.
Q: (L) Yes, but that was just a theory.
A: Oh, well we guess then it must be dropped. We'll never know. It's
just a theory. Well, we'll just forget about it.
Q: (T) I'm still expanding the circle... (SV) Me too.
A: Very good, that was the idea. It keeps going and going and going.
Q: (L) Well, mine does too, but it hasn't come back and met anything.
So, what's the point?
A: Does there need to be a point?
Q: (L) Of course!
A: Who says? We are trying to help you learn. When do you expect to
shut down this process?
Q: (J) Never. (L) Gee, I hope never.
A: Then there never is a point!
Q: (J) Point taken! (L) There is no point. [Laughter.] Well, if you
expand the circle outward and continue expanding it in all directions,
it pulls the seven spokes with it which encompasses more and more
space in a cross section, and then turn that circle, you have a sphere.
A: Precisely. But Laura says that means we are living in a big globe.
And, maybe we are.
Q: (T) Well, it wouldn't be a big globe, so to speak, it would only
be a big globe within the circle. If the circle continues to expand,
it would just continue to go outward and outward and the globe would
become bigger and bigger and bigger... (L) You're making me nervous...
(T) But it goes outward forever... cause there is no end to going
out...
A: There isn't?
Q: (SV) Nope.
A: Well, then maybe there's no beginning.
Q: (T) Well, there wouldn't be a beginning, just a big, open void.
An infinite void...
A: If there's no end and no beginning, then what do you have?
Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now.
A: The here and now which is also the future and the past. Everything
that was, is and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few
of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel,
because even though traveling into space in your third density is
every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable
home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very
close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest
illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over
that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed
into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you
do, now can you? Imagine going out into space. You'd be lost when
confronted with reality that everything is completely all at one?
Would you not? Picture yourself floating around in space!
Q: (T) Does the sphere keep expanding... as the circle expands and
you turn the circle 180 ', you get a sphere. As the sphere continues
to expand it, you take a point on the outer edge of the sphere in
order to take the sphere about itself, you get a donut, an ever expanding
inner tube. If you take that and twist it, you get an even larger
inner tube. It just continues to expand and encompasses more space...
A: And now, when you merge densities, or traverse densities, what
you have is the merging of physical reality and ethereal reality,
which involves thought form versus physicality. When you can merge
those perfectly, what you realize then, is that the reason there is
no beginning and no end is merely because there is no need for you
to contemplate a beginning or an end after you have completed your
development. When you are at union with the One at Seventh density,
that is when you have accomplished this and then there is no longer
any need for difference between physical and ethereal forms.
Q: (SV) I want to ask one question: If there is no time, there is
no past and no future; there are no past lives and no future lives,
there is no such thing as reincarnation, then how can you be us...
A: Yes, there is reincarnation. You are getting ahead of yourself
there. We never said there is no reincarnation.
Q: (SV) But, if there is no time? (J) It is our perception of it.
(L) It is all happening simultaneously. We are having all of these
lifetimes at once. (SV) Is there a way that we can connect ourselves
with all our other selves?
A: Picture it this way: we will access some of your memory banks and
give you another reference which, interestingly enough, fits very
closely with the perpendicular reality wheel that we described earlier.
You know what a slide projector looks like? To give you some feeling
of what this expanded nature of reality really is, picture yourself
watching a big slide presentation with a big slide wheel on the projector.
At any given point along the way you are watching one particular slide.
But, all the rest of the slides are present on the wheel, are they
not? And, of course, this fits in with the perpendicular reality,
which fits in with the circles within circles and cycles within cycles,
which also fits in the Grand Cycle, which also fits in with what we
have told you before: All there is is lessons. That's all there is.
And we ask that you enjoy them as you are watching the slide presentation...
Q: (J) In that analogy, the light that shines through the slide, as
it projects it upon the screen, is our perception.
A: And, if you look back at the center of the projector, you see the
origin and essence of all creation itself, which, is level seven where
you are in union with the One.
So,
let's go in another direction for a moment. The reader who has also
read the The Secret History of The World will
be familiar with my breakdown of Ouspensky's presentation of the "4th
Dimension" of time, as drawn from his book, Tertium
Organum:
We
say that space is infinite -- that it is illimitable in both scope
and direction. (There may be some who postulate an outer limit to
space, but what they propose as being outside that limit is an even
greater difficulty than that of infinity.) Space, as we perceive
it, has only three dimensions; length, width, and height. We define
this condition as three independent directions -- that is, each
measurement lies at right angles to the others simultaneously.
But,
this is a contradiction. For, if space is infinite, then it must
possess an infinite number of lines perpendicular and not parallel
to one another.
Is
infinity, then, a foolishness and does space necessarily have a
limit? If it does have a limit, in what space does our space exist?
But, if space does possess an infinite number of lines perpendicular
to one another, then we must ask why we can only perceive three.
If we exist in a condition of mind that perceives only three dimensions,
this must mean that the properties of space are created -- or differentiated
– by certain attributes within us. For some reason or another, the
Whole is inaccessible to us.
Ouspensky wrote in an essay in 1908, entitled "The Fourth
Dimension";
We
may have very good reason for saying that we are ourselves beings
of four dimensions and we are turned towards the third dimension with
only one of our sides, i.e., with only a small part of our being.
Only this part of us lives in three dimensions, and we are conscious
only of this part as our body. The greater part of our being lives
in the fourth dimension, but we are unconscious of this greater part
of ourxelves. Or it would be still more true to say that we live in
a foure-dimensional world, but are conscious of ourselves only in
a three dimensional world.
The
fact is, Ouspensky was greatly influenced in his thinking by Charles
Howard Hinton, an English mathematician. But, long before Hinton had
a clue about the ideas of the "fourth dimension," there
was Riemann. Michio Kaku tells the story in his book Hyperspace:
A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the
10th Dimension and I have pretty much followed his outline,
though reducing the length and complexity of the story.
On
June 10, 1854, at the University of Göttingen, Germany, Georg
Bernhard Riemann gave a lecture entitled On
the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry,
sounding the death knell of the classical, linear view of the universe
and introduced the theory of higher dimensions. As I noted in Noah,
the prevailing view of physics eventually filters down to affect all
our cultural and social interactions, and it was only 30 or so years
after Riemann's talk that the "mysterious fourth dimension"
would begin to profoundly affect art, philosophy and literature.
Sixty
years after, Einstein used four-dimensional Riemannian geometry to
explain the creation of the Universe and its evolution, and 130 years
later, physicists would use ten-dimensional geometry to attempt to
unite all the laws of the physical universe.
Euclidean
geometry holds that space is three dimensional and "flat."
In flat space, angles in a triangle always add to 180 degrees which
omits the possibility that space can be curved, as on a sphere. For
two thousand years, Euclid was "king" and all of Christendom
marveled at his insights. Cathedrals were built and civilizations
were born according to the principles of Euclid. Euclid and the Church
- strange, but devoted bedfellows.
Most
people can remember struggling with the theorems of Euclid: that the
circumference of a circle is pi times the diameter,
and that parallel lines never intersect. It was always pretty standard
stuff except for one little problem that most people aren't aware
of: try as they would for centuries, the greatest mathematicians simply
could not PROVE these deceptively simple propositions. As long as
you stay in "flatland," you were safe with Euclid. The instant
you wandered into curved space, Euclid was your nemesis.
Riemann
rebelled against the so-called "mathematical precison" of
Euclid, because it was apparent to him that the natural world is NOT
made up of Euclid's flat, idealized, geometric figures. It was clear
that the REAL world was made up of curves that bend and twist in infinite
variety.
Euclid
said "it is obvious" that a point has no dimension at all.
A line has one dimension: length. A plane has two dimensions: length
and breadth. A solid has three dimensions: length, breadth, and height.
And that's it! There is no more! Nothing has four dimensions, according
to Euclid.
Another
Greek who has dominated our culture for a very long time, Aristotle,
stated categorically that the fourth spatial dimension was impossible.
Ptolemy, the Egyptianized Greek went even further and constructed
a "proof" that the fourth dimension was impossible. If you
draw three mutually perpendicular lines, and then try to draw a fourth
line that is perpendicular to the other three lines, you will discover
that it is impossible. More than three mutually perpendicular lines
are not only impossible to draw, they are impossible to comprehend.
But,
what Ptolemy REALLY did was to demonstrate that it is impossible to
visualize the fourth dimension with our three-dimensional brains!
Today, mathematicians and physicists KNOW that there are many objects
that can be shown to exist mathematically, which cannot be visualized.
As
Michio Kaku writes: "Ptolemy may go down in history as the man
who opposed two great ideas in science: the sun-centered solar system
and the fourth dimension."
It
is a curious thing that many mathematicians, obviously deeply influenced
by Christianity, and their faith in the Bible as the "True and
only word of God," regularly denounced the idea of the fourth
dimension calling it a "monster in nature." And so, Euclid
and the Church dominated our minds, brainwashing humanity into thinking
that things cannot exist that we cannot picture in our minds. It was,
oddly enough when you consider the purported "spiritual goals"
of religion, a curious descent into gross materialism.
As
mentioned, the story of Riemann and how and why he prepared his famous
lecture is nicely told in Michio Kaku's Hyperspace,
well worth reading. But, what concerns us here is that Riemann developed
the idea of the metric tensor and also was one of the
first to discuss multiply connected spaces, or wormholes.
To visualize this, take two sheets of paper and place one on top of
the other. Make a little cut on each with knife or scissors, and glue
the sheets together along the two cuts only. If a bug lives on the
top sheet, he may one day accidentally walk into the cut and find
himself on the bottom sheet. He will be puzzled because everything
is in the wrong place. After much experimentation, the bug may discover
that he can re-emerge into his original world by passing again through
the cut. As long as he walks around the cut, everything is fine and
looks normal, but when he tries to take the "short-cut"
he has a problem.
"Riemann's
cuts" were used with great effect by Lewis Carroll in his book
Through
the Looking-Glass. Riemann's cut is the looking
glass.
Soon
after Riemann, researchers all over Europe began to popularize the
idea of the fourth dimension for the layperson. As it happened, Riemann's
advanced mathematics was so far in advance of the thinking of the
day that there was no physical principle to guide further research.
It was only after another hundred years had passed that physicists
even caught up with him! But, one thing that DID happen was the realization
that a being from the fourth dimension would have what would seem
to us, God-like powers. Kaku writes:
Imagine
being able to walk through walls.
You
wouldn't have to bother with opening doors; you could pass right
through them. You wouldn't have to go around buildings; you could
enter them through their walls and pillars and out through the back
wall. You wouldn't have to detour around mountains; you could step
right into them. When hungry, you could simply reach through the
refrigerator door without opening it. You could nver be accidentally
locked outside your car; you could simply step through the car door.
Imagine
being able to disappear or reappear at will.
Instead
of driving to school or work, you would just vanish and rematerialize
in your classroom or office. You wouldn't need an airplane to visit
far-away places, you could just vanish and rematerialize where you
wanted. You would never be stuck in city traffic during rush hours;
you and your car would simply disappear and rematerialize at your
destination.
Imagine
having x-ray eyes.
You
would be able to see accidents happening from a distance. After
vanishing and rematierializing at the site of any accident, you
could see exactly where the victims were, even if they were buried
under debris.
Imagine
being able to reach into an object without opening it.
You
could extract the sections from an orange without peeling or cutting
it. You would be hailed as a master surgeon, with the ability to
repair the internal organs of patients without ever cutting the
skin, thereby greatly reducing pain and the risk of infection. You
would simply reach into the person's body, passing directly through
the skin, and perform the delicate operation.
Imagine
what a criminal could do with these powers. He could enter the most
heavily guarded bank. He could see through the massive doors of
the vault for the valuables and case and reach inside and pull them
out. He could then stroll outside as the bullets from the guards
passed right through him.
With
these powers, no prison could hold a criminal. No secrets could
be kept from us. No treasures could be hidden from us. No obstructions
could stop us. We would truly be miracle workers, performing feats
beyond the comprehension of mortals. We would also be omnipotent.
What
being could possess such God-like power? The answer: a being from
a higher-dimensional world. [Kaku, 1994]
In 1877,
a scandal in London brought the idea of the 4th dimension to public
awareness in a big way. A psychic named Henry Slade was holding seances
in the homes of prominent people, and was arrested for fraud "using
subtle crafts and devices, by palmistry and otherwise." [Kaku,
1994]
Slade
was convicted of fraud by the court, but he insisted that he could
prove his innocence by duplicating his feats before a scientific
commission and Johann Zollner, professor of physics and astronomy
at the University of Leipzig, gathered together a group of scientists
who were willing to take a scientific look. Their reason for doing
so was made public and consisted in declaring that the feats Slade
claimed to be doing were, indeed, possible by manipulating objects
in the 4th dimension! In so doing, the media coverage gave the public
a real idea of just exactly what was possible in this strange world
of ours.
Among
Slade's defenders were William Crookes, inventor of the cathode ray
tube; Wilhelm Weber, Gauss's collaborator and the mentor of Riemann;
J.J. Thompson, who won the Nobel Prize in 1906 for the discovery of
the electron; Lord Rayleigh, one of the greatest classical physicists
of the late ninteenth century and winner of the Nobel Prize in 1904.
First,
Slade was given two separate, unbroken wooden rings. Could he push
one wooden ring past th other, so that they were intertwined without
breaking it? If Slade succeeded, Zollner wrote, it would "represent
a miracle, that is, a phenomenon which our coneceptions heretofore
of physical and organic processes would be absolutely incompetent
to explain."
Second,
he was given the shell of a sea snail, which twisted either to the
right or to the left. Could Slade transform a right-handed shell
into a left-handed shell and vice versa?
Third,
he was given a closed loop of rope made of dried animal gut. Could
he make a knot in the circular rope without cutting it?
Slade
was also given variations of these tests. For example, a rope was
tied into a right-handed knot and its ends were sealed with wax
and impressed with Zollner's personal seal. Slade was asked to untie
the knot, without breaking the wax seal, and retie the rope in a
left-handed knot. Since knots can always be untied in the fourth
dimension, this feat should be easy for a fourth-dimensional person.
Slade was also asked to remove the contents of a sealed bottle without
breaking the bottle.
Could
Slade demonstrate this astounding ability?
Today
we realize that the manipulation of higher-dimensional space, as
claimed by Slade, would require a technology far in advance
of anything possible on this planet for the conceivable future.
However, what is interesting about this notorious case is that Zollner
correctly concluded that Slade's feats of wizardry could be explained
if one could somehow move objects through the fourth dimension.
For
example, in three dimensions, separate rings cannot be pushed through
each other until they intertwine without breaking them. Similarly,
closed, circular pieces of rope cannot be twisted into knots without
cutting them. However, in higher dimensions, knots are easily unraveled
and rings can be intertwined. This is because there is "more
room" in which to move ropes past each other and rings into
each other. If the fourth dimension existed, ropes and rings could
be lifted off our universe, intertwined, and then returned to our
world. In fact, in the fourth dimensions, knots can never remain
tied. They can always be unravelled without cutting the rope. This
feat is impossible in three dimensions, but trivial in the fourth.
The third dimension, as it turns out, is the ONLY dimensions in
which knots stay knotted!
Similarly,
in three dimensions it is impossible to convert a rigid left-handed
object into a right-handed one. Humans are born with hearts on their
left side, and no surgeon, no matter how skilled, can reverse human
internal organs. This is possible (as fist pointed out by mathematician
August Mobius in 1827) only if we lift the body out of our universe,
rotate it in the fourth dimension, and then reinsert it back into
our universe.
Zollner
sparked a storm of controversy when, publishing in both the Quarterly
Journal of Science and Transcendental Physics, he claimed
that Slade amazed his audiences with these "miraculous"
feats during seances in the presence of distinguished scientists.
Zollner's
spirited defense of Slade's feats was sensationalized throughout
London society. Supporting Zollner's claims was his circle of reputable
scientists, including Weber and Crookes. These were not average
scientists, but masters of the art of science and seasoned observers
of experiment. They had spent a lifetime working with natural phenomena,
and now before their eyes, Slade was performing feats that were
possible only if spirits lived in the fourth dimension. [Kaku, 1994;
emphases, mine]
There
were, of course, savage critics and detractors, but in my opinion,
none of their arguments hold water. In fact, such evidence has been
demonstrated time and again over the centuries, far into the distant
past, and there have always been the detractors and "savages"
criticizing on behalf of their materialist masters or gods.
The interesting
thing about Kaku's descriptions of the abilities of a "4th dimensional
being" is that they happen to be precisely the type of things
that characterize the "Alien Phenomenon" that interacts
with our reality to a greater and greater extent with each passing
year. What's more, there is a great body of evidence that beings with
such powers have interacted with humanity for a very long time, though
in ages past they were called fairies, demons, vampires, and so forth.
Further, these abilities that are being described as "4th dimensional,"
are exactly what the Cassiopaeans term "4th density," rather
than dimension.
In 1884,
after a decade of controversy, Edwin Abbot, headmaster of the City
of London School, wrote the novel Flatland:
A Romance of Many Dimensions by a Square. Abbot was a
clergyman, which wasn't too surprising because they now had a "place"
to put heaven and hell and angels and demons - in the fourth dimension
(which probably wasn't too far off in terms of accuracy!) The unique
thing about Flatland was that is was also a biting satire of social
criticism. Abbot poked fun at the pious people who denied the possibility
of the 4th dimension. It is a book well worth reading for the many
examples it makes of bigotry and narrow mindedness that prevail, even
today, in scientific and religious communities.
Flatland
paved the way for more artistic 4th dimensional expressions, including
works by Oscar Wilde, H.G. Wells, Lewis Carroll, Joseph Conrad and
others. The development of many of the "occult societies"
including Theosophy, was influenced by the ideas of the 4th dimension.
It was, as we could say today, the "latest fad" of that
time.
This
had a good side and a bad side. On the bad side, serious scientists
sort of "distanced" themselves from the "tabloid like"
nature of the subject just as they distance themselves from anything
having to do with "aliens" today. On the good side, it became
a cultural metaphor. Cubism and Expressionism were influenced by the
4th dimensional non-Euclidean geometries.
Charles
Howard Hinton brought the 4th dimension to America. At Oxford, Hinton
had been trying to figure out ways to visualize the fourth dimension.
As a mathematician, he knew that one cannot visualize a four-dimensional
object in its entirety, but you can visualize a cross section of one.
After
some personal problems, Hinton came to America, worked for a time
at Princeton, and later at the Patent Office in Washington. He spent
years developing clever ways for the average person to "see"
four-dimensional objects. Eventually, he perfected special cubes that,
if one tried hard enough, could allow one to visualize hypercubes,
or cubes in four dimensions. These would eventually be called Hinton's
cubes. He coined the name for an "unraveled" hypercube:
Tesseract.
|
Hinton's
Cube or "Tesseract"
|
 |
Flatlanders
cannot visualize a cube, but they can conceptualize a three-dimensional
cube by unraveling it. To a Flatlander, a cube, when unfolded,
resembles a cross, consisting of six squares as the top figure
shows. In the same way, we cannot visualize a four-dimensional
hypercube but, if we "unfold" it, we have a series
of cubes arranged in a crosslike tesseract. Although this looks
like a "solid, stable" object of three dimensions,
the idea is to understand that it is really just our representation
of the hypercube which is "wrapped up" in 4 dimensional
space the same way the "cross" figure "wraps
up" into a cube when going from 2 dimensional space to
three dimensional space. |
As the
reader might guess, Hinton's cubes soon became objects of "mystical
importance." It was claimed that a person could catch glimpses
of the fourth dimension by meditating on one of them. His disciples
spent hours contemplating these cubes until they attained the ability
to mentally rearrange and reassembel them via the fourth dimension
into a hypercube. Those who could perform this mental feat, it was
said, would attain the highest state of nirvana!
Hinton's
greatest contribution to the matter of the 4th dimension was his popularization
of higher dimensional figures. These are useful in many ways because
even professional mathematicians conceputalize higher-dimensional
objects via their cross sections, their unravellings and their shadows.
The reader
might want to have a look at The
Monster from Nowhere by Nelson Bond, which describes how
a monster from the 4th dimension might manifest in our own. There
are some bizarre descriptions that actually reflect some cases of
"alien manifestation" in our own times.
Now,
where are we with all of this?
I think
we can understand that everyone has a "connection" to The
Wave, or Realm Border via a 4th dimension-like "cut" or
wormhole called a "Perpendicular Reality." Whether they
can access it or not is another question. And, whether it needs more
than one person to "produce" or "manifest" the
"cut" is still another. If the latter idea is correct, we
might conjecture that groups of seven individuals, if they are the
RIGHT seven individuals (determined by each group dynamic) can interact
in such a way as to bring exponential knowledge and awareness to each
and every member of the group, thereby "opening" the cut,
or wormhole, is a further consideration. Such groups would be called
"conduits" as the Cassiopaeans have denoted them, and, as
we learned earlier, a conduit is a sort of "escape hatch"
that can be activated upon the arrival of the Wave.
But,
exactly how might such a thing work? Well, as we went along, more
bits and pieces of the puzzle came our way though, at this point,
the Santilli session was the last time the Wave was discussed for
almost a year. We wouldn't come back to it until June of 1996 when
much water had gone over the dam and under the bridge. Changes, changes,
changes. Those who are interested can have a look at Amazing
Grace, though it is not relevant to this subject. When
it finally was discussed again, it was because I started off with
a question about something that was seemingly unrelated. And, in this
case, the "wave" that was brought up did not seem, at that
moment, to be related to THE WAVE, as we are discussing it. It was
only later that we began to suspect a connection.
Just
to give a little background about what prompted the questions that
led to the next series of clues, I had purchased a book entitled The
Sufi Path of Knowledge by William Chittick at some point
simply because I wanted to be better informed about the Sufis as a
result of my interest in the writings of Ouspensky and Gurdjieff.
I had even asked a bit about Ouspensky's presentation of 2nd dimensional
awareness relating to what the Cassiopaeans called "2nd density."
02-11-95
Q:
(L) Earlier we were reading from Ouspensky's Tertium
Organum about perceptions, was this a fairly accurate
description of the state of our perceptions and the state of 2nd
density perceptions?
A:
Yes.
Let me
note again that it seems that the mathematical explication of dimensions
is more in line with what the Cassiopaeans are describing as densities,
while "alternate realities" is more along the line of the
"popular" understanding of dimensions. There is certainly
a lot of misunderstanding and misconception out there amongst many
New Age gurus regarding these subjects. And, the sad thing is that
they use the words without any comprehension of the mathematical precision
and deeper meanings, and many people are being fed a load of hooey
with these "word salads." At the same time, there are many
who have the understanding, but haven't got the proper vocabulary
to express it, and thus the conflict between inspired perception and
science is endlessly perpetuated. But, that's a story for another
time.
During
and after the period of deep level change in my own life, I have to
admit that I was really pretty angry at the Cassiopaeans. I mean,
here they were, supposedly 6th density light beings who had been chatting
with us for some time, who, one would think, could advise me in ways
that would prevent pain and suffering, or dire and dreadful events,
and all I had experienced from the moment I began to put their suggestions
into effect was constant, unmitigated attack on my psyche, my person,
and even my family. I complained to them one night:
02-11-96
Q:
(L) I have written to a LOT of people... when am I going to find what
I am looking for?
A:
Did we not tell you, did we not advise you about the network??!??
Q:
(L) Of course...
A:
And what did you do?
Q:
(L) Well, I got online as soon as I could...
A:
And what happened?
Q:
(L) The Lizzies tried to kill me! [laughter]
A:
The Lizard Force, i.e. STS, has been attacking you since day one.
We have been advising you only for 1.5 years, as you measure it.
Q:
(L) The situation is such that I am running out of force from working
against this constant oppression and opposition. Can you tell me if
I will ever have some peace of mind so that I can continue to function?
A:
Have we?
And,
they had... in many subtle ways. The only problem was, it was never
specific. It was like being told there was a treasure in a labyrinth
that I was supposed to find, and being put into it blindfolded. Sure,
the Cassiopaeans were there on the side sort of whispering "you're
getting warm now! Oops! You're cold... colder... ICE cold...! Okay,
yes... getting warm... warmer... hot, hot!" But, that was something
of a crazy way to live. I didn't realize at the time that they were
teaching me to discern things in a way and at a level that is rarely
accessed by even those who spend their lives in the realms of metaphysics
and the paranormal. I was just frustrated and angry like a child who
was having a hard time doing math, not realizing how valuable the
practice lessons would become.
But,
it was a process that seemed to be taking forever. Several months
went by with no sessions because I was ill or depressed or just too
tired to make the effort. When we finally did have another session
at one point, I complained again:
06-01-96
Q:
(L) Several people have pointed out to me, only since we have begun
this channeling project that all these dreadful things have happened
in my life. My life is a shambles!
A:
"Dreadful is subjective."
Q:
(L) I would say that the physical things that have happened to me,
the collapse of my marriage, the things that have happened to my children,
are pretty damn dreadful, subjectively or otherwise!
A:
Before these changes began to manifest, you were deeper into the "deadly
illusion" than you are now. Emergence is, by its very nature, uncomfortable.
But, it has and will, empower you, we promise!!!!!!!!
Q:
(L) It is a very trying time now. I am having a difficult time just
coping.
A:
And there have been others, and will be others, but that does not
mean that the rewards will be slight. You are on a path of destiny,
and there is no turning back now.
In the
frame of mind I was, that sounded foreboding! I had no enthusiasm
for anything, and I was in a constant state of physical crisis from
one illness after another. But, during the periods of sickness or
tiredness and depression, I began to idly flip through this book on
the teachings of Muhyi al-Din Muhammad ibn 'Ali ibn al-'Arabi which
had sat unopened on the shelf for a couple of years. As I began to
read bits and pieces, I was stunned at the similarity of the teachings
to what the Cassiopaeans had been saying. I was also pretty excited
to find that the very things I was suffering were not unusual for
someone who was being "prepared" for some sort of "unveiling."
This gave me the heart to decide on another session at which the following
exchange took place:
06-15-96
Q:
(L) As you know, I have been studying the Sufi teachings, and I
am discovering so many similarities in these Sufi "unveilings" to
what we have been receiving through this source, that I am really
quite amazed, to say the least. So, my question is: could what we
are doing here be considered an ongoing, incremental, "unveiling,"
as they call it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Now, from what I am reading, in the process of unveiling,
at certain points, when the knowledge base has been sufficiently
expanded, inner unveilings then begin to occur. Is this part of
the present process?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) My experience has been, over the past couple of years, that
whenever there is a significant increase in knowledge, that it is
sort of cyclical - I go through a depression before I can assimilate
- and it is like an inner transformation from one level to another.
Is there something we can do, and if so, is it desirable, to increase
or facilitate this process in some way?
A: It is a natural process, let it be.
Q: (L) One of the things that Al-Arabi writes about is the ontological
levels of being. Concentric circles, so to speak, of states of being.
And each state defines relationships in terms of knowledge and awareness.
At each higher level you are closer to a direct relationship with
the core of existence, and on the outer edges, you are in closer
relationship with matter. This pretty well explicates the 7 densities
you have described for us and he says there are 7 also. He also
talks about the "outraying" and the "inward moving" toward knowledge.
My thought was that certain beings, such as 4th density STS, and
other STS beings of 3rd density, who think that they are creating
a situation where they will accrue power to themselve, may, in fact,
be part of the "outraying" or dispersion into matter. Is this a
correct perception?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Al-Arabi says, and this echoes what you have said, that you
can stay in the illusion where you are, you can move downward or
upward. Is this, in part, whichever direction you choose, a function
of your position on the cycle?
A: It is more complex than that.
Q: (L) Well, I am sure of that. Al-Arabi presents a very complex
analysis and he probably didn't know it all either... Nevertheless,
it almost word-for-word reflects things that have been given directly
to us through this source.
A: Now, learn, read, research all you can about unstable gravity
waves.
Q: (L) Okay. Unstable gravity waves. I'll see what I can find. Is
there something more about this?
A: Meditate too!
Q: (L) Yes. Well, they have been telling us to meditate. Have you
been meditating, Frank? (F) Not lately.
A: We mean for you, Laura, to meditate about unstable gravity waves
as part of research. Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown
secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear.
Q: (L) Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct?
A: And.... antimatter!
Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter "antigravity?"
Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak?
A: Binder. Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal
through unstable gravity waves!!!
Q: (L) Is antimatter what we refer to as "ethereal" existence?
A: Pathway to. Doorway to.
Q: (L) Do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density?
A: Throughout. There is no emanation point.
Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of
matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation?
A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too!
Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other
densities?
A: Everything.
Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically?
A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing.
Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity
waves? Is this what spirals do?
A: On the way to.When you wrote "Noah" where did you place gravity?
Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption
of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow
of electrical energy...
A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all
existence!
Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption... and
I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness,
and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life...
A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And
where does the gravity go?
Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go? The sun is a window.
Even our planet must be a window!
A: You have it too!! Gravity is all there is.
Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity?
A: No.
Q: (L) What is light?
A: Gravity. Gravity is "God."
Q: (L) But, I thought God was light?
A: If gravity is everything, what isn't it? Light is energy expression
generated by gravity. Please name something that is not gravity.
Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is
not gravity;, well, fine! What is absolute nothingness?
A: A mere thought.
Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non-existence?
A: Yes, there is.
Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought?
A: Both. Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated
by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity.
Q: (L) Now, did the fellow who built the Coral Castle spin in his
airplane seat while thinking his manipulations into place?
A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order
to manipulate gravity.
Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing,
or is it gravity that IS him that chose?
A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence.
Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it's probably
because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What
have I done! Alright. I am confused.
A: No you are not.
Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded.
A: Befuddling is fun!
Q: (L) Well, I guess that if any of this is going to be of particular
significance to us, then we will certainly find out the details
as we go along.
A: How many times do we have to tell you?!?! The entire sum total
of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa.
Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the "manyness" that we perceive?
A: Perception of 3rd density.
Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me... okay, that's... I
understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping
away the veils.
A: That is the fun part.
Q: (L) So, the fellow who built the Coral Castle was able to access
this. Consistently or only intermittantly?
A: Partially.
Q: (L) According to what I understand, at the speed of light, there
is no mass, no time, and no gravity. How can this be?
A: No mass, no time, but yes, gravity.
Q: (L) A photon has gravity?
A: Gravity supercedes light speed.
Q: (L) Gravity waves are faster than light?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable?
A: Utilization.
Q: (L) I feel like I am missing a really big point here...
A: You are, but you can only find it at your own pace. And, on that
note, good night.
By this
time, all of those who have thought, from time to time, that I am
a little slow on the uptake, are convinced of it! It is true that
I had read and studied for many years to discover the secrets of our
existence in this world, and I had thought, at one time, I had a pretty
good handle on all of it for a layperson. Now, all of that was just
being tossed out the window and I was back in first grade, or so it
seemed. And, in this school, I was apparently NOT the brightest student!
There
are a number of points in this last session that strike me (in retrospect,
of course!) as being worthy of keeping in mind as we go along in solving
this puzzle of how to get out of Oz and back to Kansas, and they are:
Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics
to make the picture crystal clear.
Gravity
seems to be a property of matter and antimatter! Antimatter is the
pathway or doorway to "ethereal" existence? Gravity binds
all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity
waves!!!
Thus,
through unstable gravity waves, you can access not only other densities,
but everything.
Mechanical "generation" of gravity waves is really collecting
and dispersing.
Spirals
are "On the way to" a mechanical means of collecting and
dispersing gravity waves
Gravity is the central ingredient of all existence! You have it too!!
Thoughts produce gravity. And, by relation, so does knowledge and
awareness. Remembering, of course, that knowledge and awareness are
the "keys" to forming a conduit, and we think that a "conduit"
is a Perpendicular Reality, or something similar to Riemann's Cut,
or a Wormhole.
I don't
know if you, the reader, are thinking what I am thinking about all of
this, but keep the above in mind as we continue to try to discover the
nature of The Wave and how best to be prepared to interact with it to
our benefit.
The Wave Part VI
FAIR USE NOTICE This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
The owners and publishers
of these pages wish to state that the material presented here that is the product
of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication is offered
with the caveat that the reader ought always to research on their own. We invite
the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical
mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism"
nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in
all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either
possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind
will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Cassiopaean materials Copyright © 1994-2004 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a
registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become
the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication
and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly
prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number 11884 since .
|