Now, I want to make some little observations and conjectures. Most of the creation myths speak about some sort of "ritual fault" that occurred to bring about mankind's "Fall from Grace." These myths mostly attribute this fault to something having to do with sex. We have already talked about the symbology of this in relation to the hemispheres of the brain, but we still have to deal with the out and out SEX issue! When it is talked about, it's always rather vague and mysterious and has seldom made much sense, so I am going to try to sort it out here.

In addition to the Fall from the Edenic state, there is also the Flood of Noah and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah which is blamed on sexual excess. In the Sumerian myths, it is said that humans copulating all over the place "kept the gods awake" and they could "get no rest," so they resolved to destroy the whole kit and kaboodle.

Putting this ancient mythology together with some of the things the Cassiopaeans have said has caused me no end of exhausting mental gymnastics. On the one hand, they are agreeing that a "sex based" event was definitely involved in the Fall, but then they have also said that the whole sexual thing was part of the Drachomonoid inducement to increased physicality because the 4th density STS beings "feed" on orgasmic energy as part of their nourishment:

So, on the one hand we have sex bringing us under the control of the Reptoids who supposedly WANT us to get out there and have sex so they can feed on the orgasmic energy, and on the other hand, we have these stories that tell us that the gods AKA Reptoids decided to do away with the whole mess of humanity BECAUSE they couldn't get any rest with all the sex going on! What's the deal here?!

Is it possible that there is a kind of sex that is beneficial that might be related to "spiritual unification of the masses" that would enable them to emerge from the domination of the Reptoids?

It seems to me from the clues above that there was some sort of sex going on at the time of the destruction of Atlantis that was dangerous to the control of the Lizzies. Not only that, it seems that some of the survivors retained this information and were planning on employing it in the "Tower of Babel" project, the destruction of which has always been presented as an "example" that we should not aspire to be like god!

And, of course, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were presented as being really depraved and concentrated on sexual excess.

Well, if it is true that all this sexual stuff is "food of the gods," so to speak, then what can it be about sex that they don't want us to know? Why the big whitewash? And why the big push to take over the whole world with the anti-sex monotheistic religions that made it a sin to make love unless the ONLY objective was to reproduce? If you think about it, such an attitude would naturally tend to make a person finish as quickly as possible with a "mental Left Brain image" at the fore. Hmmm... are we getting a clue here? And nowadays, of course, it is even worse. Sex is a "performance oriented" sport! How often, how many times, and how high can you "jump?" The confusion between sex and love has also served to further confuse the issue: "If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with!"

From all I have been able to determine, the ancient civilizations that were in direct contact with 4th density STO beings were those that were part of the megalithic culture. There are traces of this great age of mankind from China and India to the Atlantic Ocean; from South America to the middle of the Pacific. According to the most recent research, the very oldest form of religion that can be identified was the worship of the Celestial Mother Goddess by wandering "hunter gatherers."

It was thought, for a very long time, that such cultures were very primitive and narrow, but it has now been discovered that this is not the case. New archaeological sites are being excavated at the present time (Jomon in Japan, for example) that show very advanced levels of art and culture among these "husbandmen" of the Earth. The discernible idea of the religion of these peoples is that of an "infinite bounty of the Great Mother." It is thought that they didn't engage in agriculture because the idea of "owning land" may have been abhorrent to them. The idea of "forcing" the earth to yield, rather than accepting the natural abundance the Goddess provided was simply not a part of their philosophy. Their Goddess was a Star Being rather than the later transmogrification into the Earth Mother/agriculture goddess, and this Star Being was worshipped in Temples that were laid out along Celestial Archetypes.

And, there is also something VERY mysterious about these early people - they seemed to have had the "super powers" of the "Golden Age." Morris K. Jessup wrote:

...We concern ourselves at the moment only with the gigantic stone masonry which remains in almost all parts of the world. Certain characteristics of some of the stone work bespeak origin in a single, widespread civilization, highly developed in some ways, but not mechanical in the same sense as ours of today. ...It can be confidently said that the First Civilization had simple and effective methods of working and moving stone which are unused today, and which were more effective than anything which we of the Second Civilization have developed.

In many areas we find evidence of stone blocks of unbelievable weight being quarried, more or less casually moved considerable distances, then lifted into place. ... Many investigators and thinkers have proposed methods for moving these quarried and dressed blocks. All of the proposals are based on applications of such simple present-day engineering equipment as block-and-tackle or sand ramps. ...No suggestions have been made which really fit all cases, and some of the submissions are so cumbersome and inadequate as to seem ridiculous.

The Fortress (so-called by archaeologists, who admit no types of building other than religious, military, and occasionally residential) of Sacsahuaman is on a mountain top overlooking modern Cuzco. It is noteworthy as one of the earliest works showing the construction of walls by GRINDING AND FITTING THE STONES IN SITU." (Emphasis, mine) "These walls are also noted for the very large stones which make up the lower of three tiers, and it is these in which we are more interested.

The stones making up the corners of the reentrant angles of this lower tier, appear to be a dark basalt; heavy, hard, and rugged. They are so large that they dwarf a man on horseback standing beside them. Some of them are about twelve feet square at the base, and eighteen to twenty feet high. They are estimated to weigh about two hundred tons each. Other stones in the same walls range from small ones of only a few hundred pounds, through continuous gradations up to the largest. All of them were crudely rough quarried, and were then GROUND INTO THEIR DESIGNATED NICHES IN THE STRUCTURE BY PUSHING THEM BACK AND FORTH, IN SITU, until they fitted so closely, completely and accurately that a knife blade cannot be inserted between them. This is a logical and practical shortcut to effective stone fitting which we have not equaled in modern engineering.

"(It is interesting to note in passing, however, that we use this method in what is probably our operation of highest accuracy and precision: lens and mirror grinding for astronomical telescopes. No substitute has been found for this system of grinding pieces of glass together to obtain perfect curvature, and there is no basic difference in the two operations.)

"However, there are some startling inferences in the size and mass of the stones. To place the largest of these corner stones in place, so that others could be worked to fit them, required tremendous force. It is unimaginable that sufficient hand labor and crude tackle could be massed around them so that they could be moved and handled.

The intermediate sizes, some of them weighing ten, twenty, and forty tons, or more, had to be picked up, put approximately into place, and pushed back and forth until they ground themselves into their individually fitting contours. This was no mean chore. It is inferred that means of handling must have existed which made it easy, or at any rate possible, to swing these stones up and around, and to shove them to and fro, against terrific friction, while pinched between their adjacent neighbors. Such power would tax any modern machine or power plant and require an installation of generating equipment sufficient to run a city. It seems plainly obvious that some other source of power existed.

It may be that this tremendous power was limited in its application to articles of stone texture only, but this is a little doubtful. Or, perhaps it was limited to nonmagnetic materials in general. Such a limitation would have side-tracked the development of a mechanized culture such as ours of this day, and would partly account for the strange fact that almost all relics of the profound past are non-metallic. It does seem possible that the usefulness of that power, whatever it was, may have been limited by its very nature and that it was never developed along industrial lines because of this limitation and even, perhaps, because of a basic difference in values. This writer cannot see his way to believing that such a power was electrical, magnetic, calorific, or strictly mechanical, else it would have led to industrial developments leaving at least a few traces." [Jessup, The Case for The U.F.O.,1955]

These last remarks of Morris Jessup's are, to me, the most interesting.

It is a fact that the Earth is literally blanketed with megaliths from some ancient civilization. Tens of thousands of them! There are variations in placement and style, but the thing they all have in common is the incredible sizes of them, and the antiquity of them.

One book on the subject says:

Looming out of the mists from hillside, moor and forest glade, in a great arc around the coasts of Europe, from Sweden and the Shetland Islands in the north to Spain, Portugal and Malta in the south, stand the megaliths - great grey rocks, rough-hewn, streaked with age, often imposing, always mysterious. They range from single natural boulders to grandiose structures which would have demanded complex architectural planning and the labour of tens of thousands of men for centuries.

There has never been a systematic census of these monuments, but it is estimated that there are at least 50,000 of them. Even that figure amounts to only a fraction of the total number erected, for countless megaliths have been destroyed by the forces of nature or by man.

The known and lost monuments once formed an enormous blanket of stone extending over western Europe. today, often only the skeleton of the original can be seen. The bare grey stones were, in many cases, covered by great mounds of green turf and gleaming white quartz pebbles. Spread by their thousands along the coasts they must have been a dazzling and unparalleled sight.

Unparalleled indeed in human history. For there has never been anything like this rage, almost mania, for megalith-building, except perhaps during the centuries after AD 1000 when much the same part of Europe was covered with what a monk of the time called a 'white mantle of churches.'

[...] The megaliths, then, were raised by some of the earliest Europeans. The reason that this simple fact took so long to be accepted was the peculiar inferiority complex which western Europeans had about their past. Their religion, their laws, their cultural heritage, their very numerals, all come from the East. The inhabitants, before civilization came flooding in from the Mediterranean, were illiterate; they kept no records, they built no cities. It was easy to assume that they were simply bands of howling half-naked savages who painted their bodies, put bear-grease on their hair and ate their cousins." [Reader's Digest Association, 1977]

The whys and wherefores of this "megalith mania" are still under debate. The fact is, you can't date stones. Yes, you can date organic things found around them or near them, or under them, but you can't date the stones.

The interesting thing is that the peoples who did erect them are still, in most circles, considered to be barbarians because they did not build cities, engage in agriculture, develop the wheel, or writing.

Yet, they did something that clearly cannot and was not done by "civilized" peoples who did all of those "civilized" things. They had some sort of "power" that we cannot replicate and do not understand. Yet, this very power may be the answer to our question about why and how sex was implicated in the fall of man, the flood of Noah, and numerous other events that may lead us to some interesting discoveries.

I would like to speculate here for a moment. The first thing that comes to my mind when I consider the problem of the megaliths is that of what I call "payoff." That is, nobody who is human ever does anything without a "payoff," or to put it more generally, for a reason.

What could be the reason for the stones? There were clearly a great deal more of them than would be necessary for simple "monumental" or "worship" purposes. They appear to be arranged like the inner workings of some vast machinery whose purpose is an enigma to us.

At the same time, could the overabundant presence of these megaliths have anything to do with the things that are observed to be "lacking" in these peoples, i.e. the "signs" of civilization, the wheel, agriculture, writing and cities?

Suppose the reason for the stones and the reason for the absence of "civilized standards" are identical?

We have already mentioned the "civilizing influence" of the Drachomonoids and the possible ulterior motives behind same. It is a matter of observation that cities developed in agricultural societies as a central place to manufacture and exchange goods. Agriculture is required to feed stable and static populations. Wheels are needed to both transport people and goods in cities and from agricultural zones to cities and back. Writing is needed to keep records of transactions, as is demonstrated by the clear evidence of the earliest forms of writing... endless lists and tallys of grain and cattle. And, writing was used for another reason: to record and promulgate the exploits of certain gods and goddesses as well as keeping track of all the goods tithed to the temple and priesthood.

So, suppose none of this was needed?

Suppose a civilization existed that did not NEED cities, agriculture, wheels or writing? That is not to say that they did not produce goods nor that they did not produce food for large groups, or that they did not travel over vast distances or record their exploits.

But, suppose they did not do it in the way we would expect?

Suppose the STONES DID IT ALL!

What do I mean?

To explain, let me go in a slightly different direction for a moment: One of the things that seems to be almost ubiquitous with these "ancient groups" and their circles and mighty stone works and "star temples" and all that seems to be the fact that they all just "disappear" with alarming regularity. How many times have you read: "What happened to [this ancient group] is unknown. The site was abandoned and there is no real explanation as to what happened or where they went." (Fill in the blank with your choice of groups and times.)

Then, such writers go to great lengths explaining all sorts of possible scenarios... plague, war, climate, whatever. (Almost never is global cataclysm proposed because that is too scary, and, besides, the structures are intact, for the most part).

But, the single fact remains: the peoples associated with big piles of rocks or megalithic structures have a habit of disappearing. That's an unavoidable observation.

Frank Joseph who has been studying some ancient sites in America which seem to bear a certain relation in terms of the resemblance of some of their circles with the more ancient sites, writes:

"What, then, was responsible for all the loosely connected ceremonial centers scattered from Wisconsin to Georgia [to Mexico, etc.] winding down at the same time? The answer is simple and comprehensively correct: a calendar.

"One of the major elements in common among the various walled ceremonial centers was their concurrent function as astronomical observatories. [...] Above all they worshipped time. They may have felt oppressed by it, or perhaps they strove to live in harmony with its cycles. In either case, their obvious attention to the movements of the heavens clearly defines an obsession with the regular passage of cycles in nature.

"Here, too, the mound builders compare closely with Tenochitlan's own priest-kings, the Tlatoan, who were likewise self-conscious of time, which they envisioned as the figure of a ferocious sun god. In fact, the chief deity of the Aztecs, the solar Huitzlipochtli, was jointly known as 'the Eagle with Arrows of Fire, the Lord of Time.'

"The people of Aztalan [the name of the Wisconsin ceremonial center as handed down orally by the local Native Americans] left their ceremonial enclosure, as did the inhabitants of the rest of the walled settlements throughout the Mississippi valley, because their sacred calendar ordered them to do so. Separated by great distances as they were, their alignment posts of sundial pyramids all told their observers the same thing at the same moment: it was time to go." [Joseph, 1997]

Mr. Joseph is definitely onto something, I think, though it may not be precisely what he is thinking. It is fairly clear, though not precisely proven, that these circles were used as some sort of astronomical observatory. But, it is also clear that a simple accounting of time in order to know when to plant the grain, or when to have a ceremony for standard purposes, is all out of proportion to the "payoff" factor of the megaliths. Smaller and less difficult to build structures would serve the purposes of astronomical observations and ritual activity equally well. It seems as though the circles and other megalithic structures HAD to be built out of stone for a specific reason, that is, the stones had a function; they DID something!

And, yes, the builders DID disappear. Group after group of them. And that implies an even more interesting phenomenon: the manipulation of space/time. And, if that is the case, then it is clear why they did not need the accouterments of so-called civilization.

The Stone Movers did not NEED any of the accouterments of so-called "civilization" for the simple reason that the STONES DID EVERYTHING!

There has been some research regarding "recordings" in stones of buildings... of energy fields, earth grids and all that. Certain stones produce electricity under the right conditions... and if the stones were used to amplify mental energies... well, they would power not only transport (eliminating the need for the wheel), communication and recording of information (eliminating the need for writing), and perhaps could even "manifest" anything that was needed in terms of food and other goods (thereby eliminating the need for cities and agriculture).

Tied in to all of this is the ancient alchemical lore about the "philosopher's stone," (though I am not so naive as to think that this is the whole cheese in that regard, but it does make you think a bit...). The Holy Grail, the head of Bran the Blessed, and the Philosopher's stone of the alchemists, are all connected to the idea of certain powers that have to do with the stopping or manipulating of time, a source of endless abundance (multiplying loaves and fishes), eternal life or the "elixir of life," and so forth. And, most importantly, the idea of "cycles" and astronomical placements being necessary to the "work."

And it is not entirely out of the question that IF such was the case, that these stones could have just simply "translated" the Stone Movers into another dimension at some point when astronomical alignments were right... the "Big Payoff of going home," so to speak. Remember? "The people of Aztalan left their ceremonial enclosure... because their sacred calendar ordered them to do so. ...Their alignment posts of sundial pyramids all told their observers the same thing at the same moment: it was time to go."

And maybe all their careful record keeping in such funny ways (the 19 year moon cycle, for example; remember the 19th day as a special day of rest of the Assyrians) had to do with the moments in space/time when certain activities were most easily accomplished? Maybe they weren't a bunch of silly, superstitious savages hauling stones around and sweating like crazy just to dance around in the moonlight and discover when to plant the corn?

But, getting back to our ideas about sex, how did these ancient peoples think about sex? Do we have a way of figuring it out? Did it, in fact, play a part in their seemingly magical abilities? Did any of these peoples "move to a different reality" of their own volition, or were they destroyed by the Reptoids because they were a threat? Are these the types we are talking about when we find stories of sex that "kept the gods awake all night?"

It's funny that the remark from the Sumerian legends about all the night long fornicating made me think of another "all night" party I came across in my research.

Now, aside from the fact that the only temple that could fit the above description is Stonehenge, which of course, pretty much does away with the modern day version of the Druid hocus pocus, we find the description of the ceremonies to be most interesting in terms of our subject.

From what I have been able to piece together, these ancient peoples of the megaliths were in tune with the "Celestial Forces." They were a group apart from the Serpent oriented agriculturists or the serpent hating, (though still controlled by them in the guise of Yahweh/Jehovah) wandering shepherd king monotheists. They worshipped neither the earth and a pantheon of gods, nor a single "creator god" embodied in a concept. They were, in effect THE THIRD MAN. At some point in my research, I came across the following in Manly Hall's The Secret Teachings of All Ages:

So, we are getting "close." But, back to the Third Man, these ancient peoples probably didn't worship anything in the sense we would understand it. Diodorus put his own "spin" on what he was telling, and it would have been difficult for his Mediterranean mind to grasp people that just simply loved and studied and observed and utilized the principles of Nature.

On the other hand, if Diodorus' description is fairly accurate regarding the dedication of the temple to Apollo alone, it is likely that this was a later inversion of the Celestial worship. Apollo, being a twin to Artemis/Diana, is part of the Divine Twins archetype which leads us again, to the Third Man.

The divinity in the old religion was neither a female or male figure, but both male and female. This does not mean that the ancient peoples were hermaphrodites, but rather it symbolized the balanced right and left brain function state prior to the Fall. The fact that women were on an equal footing with men, in terms of honor and respect, makes it seem, to the modern patriarchal mind, that it was a female dominated society. But these were not peoples who were "ruled by women." They were cultures in which men and women were in harmony and in which the brain functions were balanced so that they were enabled to "transduce" the cosmic energies into their reality for active creation purposes.

Unfortunately, the symbols and their meanings as well as the knowledge of their activation degenerated into self-serving figments of the prurient imaginations of later redactors. The Matriarchal agriculture oriented societies alongside the Patriarchal Shepherd King societies were the results of the "split." Neither of them accurately represented the Pre-Fall society which is symbolized by the Androgyne. Eliade writes:

The principles of Nature and the Cosmos that were studied and honored by these ancient peoples were later embodied as Bacchus/Dionysus which concealed the true meaning and protected the tradition for a time. The Bacchic culture embraced three general principles which were, in modern terms, celebration, creativity and chivalry. Throughout history, whenever the Mystic traditions have been revived, these three themes become dominant in the society.

The "Celebration" of the Bacchants has been redacted to drunken revelry. Nothing could be further from the truth of the original meaning, though it is entirely likely that later, ignorant perversions occurred among the followers. But, the original principle was that the celebrants achieved elevated states of consciousness by music, singing and dancing, often in processions or highly stylized spiral movements. The original purpose was to use their bodies as circuitry, or part of the machinery of the megaliths.

In addition to the the elevated states of consciousness achieved in the spiral dances accompanied by music and singing (NOT drunkenness with wine!), it is thought that preparation or "charging" for these ceremonies was accomplished via "Mystical Sexual Union." The redactors have corrupted this to "wild orgies," naturally.

Many modern historians have ignorantly interpreted the accouterments and later accounts of these rites as "fertility rituals." They were supposed to have been performed with the intent of eliciting magical reproductive favoritism from nature. The ideas of gaining personal advantages, success, protection or anything else by practicing rites or rituals, spells, prayers, sacrifices and so forth are characteristic of Left Brain function, NOT Mystical union. (Yes, many meditators and "stupid saints" as well as practitioners of the Black arts HAVE managed to access the gateway by "raping the maiden of the well," but the price is high and very few who do it that way survive long in this world.)

In short, the Bacchanalian celebration was to directly experience an altered state of consciousness which brought about a unification with the Cosmos and Nature, and even had the potential for transcending Time and Space in a direct, material/experiential manner. In the sensual, physical unification with the Cosmos, we see the the profound activation of the Right hemisphere of the brain in direct physical experience of the world via the sense perceptions as distinct from IMAGINING the world according to supposedly authoritative measurement and description.

In a bacchic culture, the mutual need and inseparability of the sexes was exemplified by the principles of androgyny and the hermaphrodite, or Apollo and Artemis, the twins. The Androgyne represented the idea that every woman and man has both a male and female aspect and the hermaphrodite represented the idea that each man or woman was merely half of a functioning unit in terms of polarity, or circuitry that could somehow be "unified" to accomplish creative functions. The hermaphrodite was a macrocosmic symbol or the male/female unified Cosmos, and the androgyne is a microcosmic symbol of the male/female unity that can occur within each individual.

The goal of bacchic culture and the secret teachings of the Mystical traditions was harmony, balance, and unity between men and women and between the male and female aspects within each person.

The mystical literature tells us that the feminine principle corresponds to the intuitive, creative, intimate, immediate, unitive, nourishing, sensuous, spontaneous aspects of our consciousness. The masculine principle reflects logic, labeling, theoretical, legal, boundary consciousness, rule-following, mission-oriented, competitive characteristics.

In this categorization, we can easily see that we are NOT referring to biophysical maleness or femaleness, but rather to the left and right modes of consciousness within all peoples.

So, when it was said that the "female energy consorted with the wrong side" and "lost knowledge and power" thereby, we can now see that it was a "rewiring of the thinking," by giving dominance to the part of the brain that literally inhibits creativity and access to universal energies that can be accessed by anyone. It was by replacing the direct knowledge of the Cosmos via empirical observation, i.e. KNOWLEDGE, with the "Wishful Thinking," conceptual, imaginary mode of a Creator God OUTSIDE of the Cosmos, and thus only accessible via "intercession," that we lost our connection.

But, we can't be throwing the baby out with the bathwater here! We have to remember that science is a child of the Right hemisphere, but is reared by the Left hemisphere! In fact, without both aspects in proper balance, very little can be achieved! The King rules the material realm by virtue of his union with the Queen!

The direct, sensual experience of the world, unclouded by preconceptions or anticipation, is precisely what constitutes scientific empiricism and objectivity! It is at the root of the Cassiopaean motto: Knowledge Protects! But knowledge only protects if it is utilized.

We know without a shadow of a doubt that the megalith builders utilized advanced mathematics, geometry and astronomy. Numbers appear to be the language by which we can translate Right brain perception into useful Left Brain action. This is why the mystical traditions are written in mathematical codes!

The original "splitting of the unity into two" is described mathematically as the infinite cosmos contracting infinitely, leaving a void, or zero, and everything else, or One. This contraction or "split" made Divine apperception possible. Using this Divine Principle of creation, Gottfried Leibniz developed binary arithmetic in the 1700's, and this is the basis of all of our computer communications today! Everything in the cosmos can be expressed by two figures, 0 and 1.

Science is not a "fixed body of knowledge," even if many scientists of today wish it to be so. It is a constant observation, experiential interaction, ever-renewing process of discovery, growth and evolution. By its very nature, it is elusive of definition, never static, and impermanent.

That is also the philosophy of the Cassiopaeans. How many times have they said: Learn! Discover! Open! Up to you!? And because I didn't understand, it drove me crazy. I wanted THE answers! I wanted THE Truth! I wanted the bottom line of all existence right there in my lap with ribbons and bells! But it cannot be given in a concept! I must be EXPERIENCED via KNOWLEDGE.

Another aspect of science that engages our Right hemisphere is art and music. The numerical structure of music is thought to be the direct link between art and science, and is thus a "conductor" for expression of direct experience into the active Left hemisphere. One can experience music directly, without any thinking or imagining or conceptualizing. And, at the same time, one is "experiencing" mathematics! No words can accurately and completely convey what something "sounds like." It is an act of direct perception.

Now, what does all this have to do with sex?

Well, actually, nothing.

But it has everything to do with making love.

You see, sex as SEX, is Left brain. It is desire and goal oriented. It is loaded with anticipation. When one thinks about "having sex," one has an image in the mind's eye of the "end result." Even if it is not a visual image, it is an abstract image or concept of orgasmic repletion. It is a focusing on a physical act without due consideration of the spiritual connections and implications.

Nowadays Sex comes in a variety of "plans" which relate back to specific "conceptual" purposes. There is the plan of technical performance and variety with the purpose of "being a good lover." There is neurotic celibacy or abstinence to "avoid guilt." There is masturbation that occurs either alone or with a partner with the purpose of "relieving tension." There is submission to a partner for "duty." There is just doing it because it has always been done to "maintain the status quo" or "habit." There is keeping up with the modern trends, to avoid "shame." One can have brief, promiscuous affairs out of schizoid fears of intimacy. One can have sex for reproduction. You can even "make love" just to enjoy sex, for intimacy and pleasure for the idea of "love and affection." In all of these, there is an "abstract audience" and "idea" behind the act.

And that is where the full power of the Right brain is short circuited and caused to release its creative potential to a momentary contraction to voidness that is uncontrolled, undirected, and unusable. And after such an act, one is, indeed, in a condition where Frequency Resonances can be used to chemically or physically alter the DNA, or "put out the eyes." Going after sex with in any of the above ways is a raping of the Right brain function. But, we will come back to this further on.

Now, let's go back for just a bit to our book The Solarion Legacy. Mr. Von Ward makes another interesting observation:.

I would like to point out that we DO have such a language. It is called "Nature." Nature is going to teach us quite a bit. The more one contemplates Nature, the more awe one must feel regarding the creation. The problem is, for some people, the more they learn, the more miserable they are. The person who learns, for the first time, that the cat toys and tortures the mouse before killing and eating it, is stunned that such cruelty exists in Nature. It is seen as "evil." Such people then seek to construct imaginary worlds of spirit where no cat ever tortures the mouse before eating it. They quote the scripture where it says "The lion lies down with the lamb," assuming that they will all eat grass, I suppose. Well, what about the grass? Isn't it alive also? So, in creating such fantasies, they cheat themselves of the truth about the Natural world which is the organ of Prime Creator's expression.

This distortion grows and extends to all that they learn and consider. When they discover something that is "not nice," or "of the darkness," or "negative," they recoil in fear and horror. What's more, they immediately begin to plan how to "fix it," because, obviously, in their minds, such a reality is "broken."

The plain fact is, the evil which we "read into" the world and all the imperfections which we believe we have discovered, are simply a result of the limits of our understanding. The narrower the point of view from which we look upon, view or observe things, the more evil and the more imperfections we see.

There are many who have written to me about the "fear based" information on these pages. They assume, automatically, that because we talk about reality in pretty plain terms, including all aspects of it, that I must be sitting here at my desk, quaking and quivering in terror with every word I type. Nothing could be further from the truth. I have to state right here and now that I have NEVER been in a state of fear once I have learned the true nature of what energies are behind the manifestations of our world. For all the many years that I studied evil and darkness in an attempt to reconcile its existence to the idea of a perfect, loving God, it was the perception of the darkness as an "error" or "mistake" or "flaw" that made me afraid. What is more terrifying than to think that your soul and life can be subject to either an accident or tricks of temptation? What is more terrifying than to think that an accident or error can exist ontologically in the universe that is supposed to be God's "creation?" The only conclusions I could ever come to with that thinking was that mankind was either a sick joke or a plaything of god - and neither of those ideas is conducive to love and faith!

As I gained more and more knowledge about the world, my point of view broadened. And, as my perspective expanded, the more the evils disappeared! Now, don't get me wrong. When I say they "disappeared," that does NOT mean that they went away or were transformed. Not at all. I just stopped seeing them as "evil." Not only that, I began to see the incredible humor in the situation. When I become aware of a Reptoid "maneuver" in my life, I almost laugh with glee at the challenge of a worthy opponent!

No indeed. I still can see demons in the world and at work; I still see the creeping darkness shadowing the souls of mankind, blotting out their access to their creative potential. I still see war and genocide and famine and plague as part of our reality. Not only that, I see these things as part of the reality that are NOT going to change into something that we call "good" by the powers of concentrated love and light. It is NOT a good idea to "send them love and light" because they don't WANT it. But that doesn't mean that I don't LOVE them! Semantics? No. Subtle but important distinction? Yes.

And, even though, for convention, I use terms such as "dark and light," and "good and evil" and "positive and negative," in order to talk about things in a practical way, I no longer see these things as an "essential error" or that which "must be done away with" or "transformed" in order for mankind to grow and ascend out of this "vale of tears." The fact is, most of mankind is not done with the lessons in this school and to try to change it for those who aren't finished with the lessons would be to violate their free will, not to mention their whole cosmic plan and purpose!

What I see now is that all of these things exist, the light and the dark, the good and the evil, the positive and the negative, the STS and STO beings, as part of the superb framework of the infinite Prime Source.

What is more, I see the REASON for it to be this way, above and beyond just the simple "choice" of mankind to "experience learning at a faster rate." That issue is not relative to our particular Group Soul only; there are infinite other souls and Group Souls and beings in the Cosmos who partake of the same conditions as we do, at different levels. There is far more to this state than that.

In one sense, you could say that it is a vast and glorious self-regulating organism that IS One; but it is One IN Manyness. It is only when we perceive this actual Unity as ALREADY EXISTING, and not as something that one has to imagine or pretend will come into being, (which means excluding all that one finds "unpleasant" or not of "love and light"), will the literal fact of this state manifest in one's life.

But, I am getting ahead of myself here. Let's look at Nature in some interesting contexts and discover our Beloved in all the many moods and faces that will be shown to us.

---

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here that is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication is offered with the caveat that the reader ought always to research on their own. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Cassiopaean materials Copyright © 1994-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

 

 

You are visitor number 757 since April 16, 2009.