|
|
Well,
we are still asking "Why?!"
We
have "peeled the onion," layer by layer, and have come
to the center and found nothing there.
Or,
is that altogether true? It may take a little time to put the puzzle
back together, and I hope the reader will bear with me because it
would be completely useless for me to give the answer in twenty-five
words or less. Following the trail of "clues," however,
will provide many opportunities for comparison, for assimilation,
and for points of further investigation.
We
know that this question, "why?" is one that we don't like
to face. But, when we awaken late at night, alone in our thoughts,
with no distractions of daily life to fill the void, we are face
to face with our existential dilemma. And it is a terrible silence.
In those moments of cold clarity, the bleakness and futility of
our existence in cosmic terms rises up to confront us as it has
confronted all of humanity throughout millennia.
We
have seen that, to escape this monstrous "dark night of the
soul," we will accept any answer that may be offered because
the cold, abyssal silence that follows the question must be filled
at any cost. And, the sad fact is, there are plenty of people willing
to try to convince us that they have "the answer to all our
questions." But, these answers generally consist of confusing
the discernment of reality with personal opinion which results
in a judgment upon reality by refusing to acknowledge it.
And we have seen that those parts of reality that are refused or
judged as "wrong" or "evil" have a way of manifesting
in our face, demanding to be "witnessed."
On
the one hand, we have the Cassiopaeans telling us that the conditions
of our reality are exactly like what Gurdjieff spoke about in the
Tale of the Magician which we recounted
in chapter Eight. We have found similar witnesses to this version
of the "great question" in very ancient traditions such
as Sufism, gnosticism, and perhaps even Catharism, as well as the
more contemporary treatments, such as the writings of Carlos Castaneda,
Theun Mares, and other teachers of the Toltec path.
And
on the other hand we have the myriad "imaginary beliefs"
of mankind. These beliefs are dearly held, as we can see by this
note from one of our readers:
Dear
friends Laura & Ark
I have read many of your C messages, the final feeling is always
a sad tone of despair. Finally, I begin to question how can be
gathered so many misfortunes on a little planet like earth if
the universe is so big? ...All the message of C's is of the same:
we are damned whatever we can do. However please think: the human
race is far better than all those beings from 6D, 4D and all others
dimensions, if we can have Mozart, Bach; Music and Poets, mothers
that care for ther children and loving fathers. We are far better
than all these silly things. Believe me, they are trying to confound
you, and with a message as of the good guys, some truth with many
lies between, and at the end we are all dammed. Do not waste your
time and your soul.
Whenever
I receive correspondence of this sort, I do not just automatically
reject it as something from someone who is not "getting it."
I always use it as an opportunity to reexamine everything I think
in order to discover it, by some chance, they could be absolutely
right, and I could be wrong, and the Cassiopaean information could
be just another in an endless series of disinformation campaigns
designed to get humanity under the control of some dark forces by
the act of making them "believe" in same.
In
Chapter 10, we discussed how information
can be "corrupted" by the biases of the receiver or ignorance
of the source, even if that source is "discarnate." .
But, we still need to deal with the deeper question suggested above.
How do we do this?
As
the reader probably knows by now, we don't just take everything
the Cassiopaeans say as "truth" without a lot of checking
and cross-checking and experimentation. We don't now, nor did we
ever, take it as "true believer" material. It sure is interesting
because of the many areas that have independent corroboration, but
some of it is, by its very nature, unverifiable.
As
I have already written, there are many things we have learned, and
not just from being "informed," but by having a suggestion given
to us, which we then observed, experimented with, and developed
more fully on our own. And, this is one of the keys to the Cassiopaean's:
they don't just "hand it out." As I have noted before, they give
"clues," but not roadmaps. Their position is that if we don't DO
something, work for it as it were, it is useless like candy: empty
calories. And, clearly, this approach is designed to make the practice
of "channelling" unnecessary and obsolete. We will, eventually,
"become" them. Repeatedly they tell us that "leading us
by the hand" is detrimental; they have laid the groundwork, given
us the boost because we ASKED (and did so repeatedly, consistently,
and with dedication for over two years before the contact initiated),
but that the real purpose is to get us to learn to walk on our
own, aware, protected and free of fear and ignorance. Hopefully,
I will be able to convey this to the reader as well. It has taken
many words and hundreds of pages to get us to this point, to the
moment that we "ask the question," and I would like to
devote an equal amount of space to building the foundation for the
answer.
Subtle
answers that require effort to dissect promote intensified learning.
Learning is an exploration followed by the affirmation of knowing
through discovery. Learning is necessary for progress of soul...
this is how you are building your power center... Patience
serves the questor of hidden knowledge... Search your "files."
...Learning is sometimes best accomplished by study and exploration...
There are other clues that you can discover by your own study...
[Cassiopaeans]
This
is going to become an important point, this "building your
power center," so hang on to that idea.
Getting
back to our reader who suggests that the Cassiopaeans are "trying
to confound you, and with a message as of the good guys, some truth
with many lies between ...All the message of C's is of the same:
we are damned whatever we can do."
It
is a logical inconsistency to teach awareness and defense against
"dark forces" as a means of fostering control by these
very same forces. This issue has been brought up many times in the
past, the most significant treatment of it being expounded by Jesus:
Then
a blind and dumb man, under the power of a demon, was brought
to Jesus, and He cured him, so that the blind and dumb man both
spoke and saw. ... But the Pharisees hearing it said, This Man
drives out demons only by and with the help of Beelzebub, the
prince of demons. And knowing their thoughts, He said to them,
Any kingdom that is divided against itself is being brought
to desolation and laid waste, and no city or house divided against
itself will last or continue to stand. And if Satan drives out
Satan, he has become divided against himself and disunited; how
then will his kingdom last or continue to stand? And if I
drive out the demons by Beelzebub by whose help do your sons drive
them out? ... Or how can a person go into a strong man's house
and carry off his goods without first binding the strong man?
Then indeed he may plunder his house. ... Either make the tree
sound, and its fruit sound, or make the tree rotten and its fruit
rotten; for the tree is known and recognized and judged by
its fruit. [Matthew 12:22-33, exc. Amplified,
Zondervan]
Curiously,
the effect of the demons was the condition of being "blind
and dumb." The analogy also included the idea of a "strong
man" being bound up so that a thief could come in and plunder
his possessions which is pretty much what we are finding to be the
case. But, the main point was the issue of the "Kingdom of
Satan/darkness" being brought to waste and desolation by division.
"If Satan drives out Satan, he has become divided against himself
and disunited: how then will his kingdom last or continue to stand?"
Jesus was pointing out to the Pharisees that it was completely illogical
to accuse him of working in concert with darkness since the effect
of his work was to free the man of his demonic attack which enabled
him to both see and speak.
In
actual fact, the greatest deception of all is the teaching that
there are no "real" negative forces, and if there are,
in any case, we haven't to worry about them because, if we just
think nice thoughts, meditate regularly, and use our warm and fuzzy
affirmations nothing icky will ever enter our reality.
I
can assure you that evil insinuates itself into our lives in the
guise of goodness and truth. The difficulty in talking about evil
nowadays lies not in the weird or bizarre, but rather from the insistence
by our culture that religious views of good and evil are outdated.
The problem is further exacerbated by the New Age teaching that
"evil" simply does not exist unless an individual creates it in
their reality. This is an important point because the process
of evil follows the line of erosion of our spirituality through
the erosion of knowledge. What better way to protect evil activities
than to deny that they exist? The fact is, the "selves"
which create evil and wish to perpetuate it are those at higher
density levels and against whom we have no defense except through
knowledge of who they are and how they work. We must learn about
the lies in order to perceive the truth.
There
are those who speak of "fallen angels" who became the "minions of
Satan." However many ancient teachings describe this attitude, this
essence of evil, as existing "From the beginning." This implies
that there has always been a pathway of "darkness" or "service to
self" since the instant of creation. This means that on one
side of the coin, loving all others as the mode of loving God and
self exists; and on the other, the opposing philosophy of loving
oneself as God and manipulating others to perpetuate this
love of self is equally valid. It might even be said that without
this tension of opposition, nothing could or would exist.
If
we remove the terms light and dark or good and evil, we are left
with the clinical terms positive and negative polarities. But even
here, we have a "judgment" that may not be appropriate.
Nevertheless, using these words as a "convention," we
can observe that there is a pinnacle of negative polarity and there
are those entities from many realms who follow this pathway. We
must understand that it is a path. It has validity in
the realm of creation. If it were intended to be destroyed,
could not God ease all our problems and reach out and return this
energy to Himself?
There
are those who believe that putting one's attention on these ideas
"gives them energy." This is true only if one focuses in this way
with the intention of participation, even if vicariously! However,
a comprehensive understanding of these forces is absolutely necessary
in order to know how to give them less energy.
"The
only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to
do nothing."
But,
what should "good men" do? What are we supposed to derive
or understand about the Cosmos from all the Cassiopaeans have told
us? Clearly, they are NOT going to give us all the answers on a
silver platter; we have to figure it out! I am working on it and
these pages are the result. I am not saying that my interpretation
or understanding of any of it is in any way "final" or
absolute. And, with new information, some of my ideas may change.
But for now, I am sharing what I think I have learned. If it finds
resonance in the reader, if it provides a platform for their own
experiments or seeking, then it has served its purpose.
The
Cassiopaeans have said that one should not "act against"
the forces of darkness, but that rather one should "act FOR"
one's own destiny. In a very practical sense, this can even include
physically extricating oneself from any number of unpleasant situations,
even with force if necessary. If someone is trying to kill you or
someone you love, and it is YOUR perception of your destiny, or
you feel it is your responsibility to prevent that, then it is entirely
within the parameters of "acting for one's own destiny"
to do whatever is necessary to save your life or the lives of others.
But,
we are talking about this in many more subtle ways. How can one
act FOR one's own destiny if one has been deceived and hypnotized
to think that what is good is evil or vice versa? And, it is not
always that simple. The analogy of the Evil Magician and his flock
suggests to us that, in a certain sense, the flock is being "cared
for." But, this care has an objective: occasionally the Magician
comes and takes one or more of the flock for its "flesh and
skin."
We
can certainly see that there seems to be a certain amount of "care"
manifested for humanity by some of these forces and beings that
have been proposed or identified throughout the ages. But there
are certain issues about this that we need to consider with cold
logic. We have the ancient legends of the Fish Gods and the Dragon
cultures, the Serpent Gods and the Annunaki and so forth, all identified
as "civilizing" influences on humanity. But, as we have
already discussed, these "benefits" may have a different
agenda than just to assist mankind!
Q:
This book (Fingerprints
of the Gods) says that on this pyramid, at the time
of the Spring and Autumn equinoxes, patterns of light and dark
combine to create the illusion of a giant serpent undulating on
the northern staircase. On each occasion the illusion lasts for
3 hours and 22 minutes exactly. What was this optical illusion
created to convey?
A: Worship of serpentine deity.
Q: Was it created to convey or produce any other effect other
than worship?
A: The key is in the reading of the geometric cycle.
Q: On page 80, the book talks about these statues at Tiahuanaco
on Lake Titicaca. It says: 'Carved in red sandstone, worn and
ancient beyond reckoning, the statue stand about 6 feet high and
portrays a humanoid, androgynous being with massive eyes and lips.
In it's right hand it clutches something resembling a knife with
a wavy blade like an Indonesian kris. In it's left hand is an
object like a hinged and case-bound book. From the top of this
book, however, protruded a device which had been inserted into
it as though into a sheath. From the waist down, the figure seemed
to be clad in a garment of fish scales.' Okay, there is
another statue with an object in it's left hand that is like a
case bound book, but from it protruded a forked handle. The right
hand object was roughly cylindrical, narrow in the center and
bigger at each end. It appeared to have several different parts.
I would like to know what these objects, or devices, carved into
these ancient statues represented?
A: Conductor for Quartzine energy from atmospheric source.
Q: What was this energy used for?
A: All. When one harnesses free energy, no limitations need apply.
Q: Why were these beings depicted with these fish-like garments?
A: Reptoids have that genetic profile to varying degrees.
Q: According to the Sumerian traditions, this was like the god
Oannes. In the night time, he would plunge back into the sea,
but in the daytime he would converse with men, giving them insight
into letters and sciences and every kind of art. But, it was noted
that he was never observed to eat. It says that he taught men
how to construct houses, temples, to compile laws, and explained
to them the principles of geometric knowledge. He made them distinguish
the seeds of the earth and made them gather fruits. In short,
he instructed them in everything that would tend to soften manners
and humanize mankind. From that time, so universal were his instructions,
that nothing has been added materially in the way of improvement.
The surviving images of Oannes on Babylonian and Assyrian reliefs
clearly portray him as a fish man. Is this another similar profile?
A: "El legato."
Q: Was this Oannes fish man similar to the Quinotaur that was
supposedly the half-father of the Merovingian royal line?
A: Only if one considers losses in the translative quarry.
Q: Here it says: The Spanish Conquistadores and missionaries destroyed
nearly everything that we could possibly use to learn about the
South American civilizations. A sixteenth century eyewitness says
that there was an emerald idol that was completely fantastic.
Father Benito took this idol and had it ground up, stirred the
powder in water, poured it on the ground and stomped on it. Cortez
was given two circular calendars, one of gold and the other silver,
as big as wagon wheels, with all kinds of hieroglyphs on them,
which he immediately had melted down and cast into ingots. 'All
over Central America, vast repositories of knowledge, accumulated
since ancient times, were painstakingly gathered, heaped up, and
burned by the zealous Catholic missionaries. In July, 1562, for
example, in the main square of Monte, in the Yucatan, Father Diego
de Landa burned thousands of Maya manuscripts, paintings and hieroglyphs
inscribed on rolled up deerskins. He said: 'We found great numbers
of books written in the characters of the Indians, but since they
contained nothing but superstitions of the Devil, we burned them
all, which the natives took most grievously, and gave them great
pain.' Hancock says: 'Not only the natives should have felt this
pain, but anyone and everyone then and now who would like to know
the truth about the past. Diego de Landa participated in Spain's
Satanic mission to wipe clear the memory banks of Central America.
In the marketplace at Texcoco, they built a vast bonfire of astronomical
documents, paintings, manuscripts, hieroglyphic texts, which the
Conquistadores had forcibly extracted from the Aztecs during the
previous eleven years. As this irreplaceable storehouse of knowledge
and history went up in flames, a chance to shake off some of the
collective amnesia that clouds our understanding was lost to mankind
forever.' So, having read this sickening description about 'Spain's
Satanic Mission' to destroy the past, I would like to have a comment
on what was motivating the Catholic Church, the Catholic Missionaries,
and Spain itself. Could you comment?
A: You should not need commentary, as we have told you much
about the desires of 4th density STS to obscure truth by manipulating
3rd density STS.
Q: Well, yes. But, Lord have Mercy! It just makes a person sick
to think about it... all of this and the Library at Alexandria
too! Was this the kind of stuff that was being done in Europe
during the so-called 'Dark Ages?'
A: Yes.
Q: And that is why the Dark Ages are Dark. The Catholic Church
destroyed everything that did not sharpen their own axe.
As
William Bramley noted in The
Gods of Eden, when we consider history, we can clearly
see that the drive of human beings to have peace is as strong, if
not stronger, than the drive to have war. But, when the issue of
war is examined, one realizes that, most often, the "trigger"
for war and related "inhumanity to man" is that the
drive for spiritual freedom is twisted by manipulation. It's
easy to look back on history and see where this or that group was
"misled" in their beliefs and thereby fell into errors
of thinking that led to the perpetration of unspeakable horrors.
We can point to the genocide advocated by the God of the Hebrews,
or the religious-zeal-run-amok of the Catholic church when it instituted
the Inquisition. We can see the twisted version of the "genetic
superman" that led to the holocaust. It's easy to discern these
errors of the past, because we "know more now." Well,
isn't that an interesting thing? We KNOW more now. How much more
can we learn?
Well,
it almost seems as if the game has just gotten more and more complex,
but the same essential errors keep getting repeated. What is at
the root? (Aside from the fact that we notice the above examples
all relate to monotheistic exclusivity.)
Human
beings have a sort of "built in drive" for spiritual knowledge.
And over and over again we can see that this drive is what is being
manipulated. When genuine spiritual knowledge is distorted while,
at the same time, the inner desire for "salvation" is
constantly being stimulated by various religious teachings, a great
many people can be led into doing a lot of cruel and stupid things.
The perceived need to "save souls" is a prime example
of how such a seeming positive polarization can be suddenly shifted
to do the exact opposite of what the religious teachings explicate.
And this is an important point to remember!
Zecharia
Sitchin and William Bramley following Von Danniken have postulated
that the ancient evidence demonstrates the actual, physical presence
of an extraterrestrial race who came to earth to set up "controls"
over humanity, with possible plans to return and "harvest the
fruits" of their efforts. In both cases, their studies have
indicated strongly that this "extraterrestrial race" does
NOT have humanity's best interests at heart! These guys did a lot
of work, gathered a lot of FACTS, and were not listening to some
bug eyed Gray alien who was trying to convince them that "this
is for YOU! We are here to help!"
But,
those same "aliens" we find today, zipping about, sliding
in and out of our reality like slippery eels, gazing and probing
and "communicating" all kinds of excuses and scenarios
to explain what they are doing based on how gullible or ignorant
their victims are; this must be considered also. In other words,
what Sitchin and Bramley fail to factor into their arguments is
the CONTINUING evidence of "interaction" and "domination"
from another "realm" of existence. The Annunaki, as defined
by Sitchin, and the "Custodians" as defined by Bramley,
did not come as physical beings, (in our terms), occupy,
dominate, and then leave for some obscure reason. The evidence of
those, now numbering in the multiples of thousands, claiming "alien
abduction" and "contact with aliens" and even "visions
of the Virgin" and other miracles throughout history, contradicts
this view. It seems far more likely that the ancient stories indicate
a cultural openness that permitted perception of such beings,
acknowledged their reality, and merely made the distinction
between them and ordinary human beings by referring to them as "gods."
William
Bramley also chronicled considerable historical evidence of a relation
between the sightings of UFOs and the sudden onslaught of deadly
diseases or plagues. We have similar concerns in the present time
which indicates that this is not a "new thing," but merely
part of a cycle. The Annunaki have never left, and the Brotherhood
of the Serpent is still with us, active and growing stronger by
the day.
As
noted, a number of modern "contactees" and "abductees"
claim that the aliens are here to help mankind, to eradicate disease,
to bring us health and happiness. This is NOT supported by the historical
evidence, though in some individual cases it may be true. But, in
these particular cases, wouldn't it make sense for those of the
Darkness to care for their "agents?"
In
their attempts to warn us, to educate us, to wake us up, the Cassiopaeans
have told us many dreadful things. Why?
The
above reader sees it as "we are all damned in the end."
But IS that what the Cassiopaeans are saying? Are they not really
saying that we need to wake up to what is under the surface of our
very contradictory reality? That we need to become aware and alert
and "see the unseen?" Are they not telling us that "Satan
can appear as an Angel of Light?" Are they not telling us that
we are "strong men" who have been "bound" so
that what is ours can be stolen? Are they not telling us to "drive
out the demons" and open our eyes and begin to speak?
It's
a little bit curious that just those two terms were used, omitting
the "ears" as something that might be "opened"
by the casting out of demons. But, the fact is, most of the distortions
of our reality come to us by listening rather than observing. Deception
and error of perception would have far less influence on us, and
we would have no illusions, if we would look at the face value of
objects and see things for what they really are. Most of mankind's
illusions are the "children of the ear" and hearsay. My
beloved grandmother always told me to "believe none of what
you hear and only half of what you see." This is very good
advice. If we open our eyes and look at the problem as objectively
as we can, forgetting all our beliefs and assumptions, and all the
things we have been "told," we might be able to draw some
conclusions.
A problem
is defined in terms of two categories: objects and operations.
The objects are the things that the problem-solver has to manipulate.
They may be people, things, or situations. The operations are the
steps by which object A is transformed into object B. Solving a
problem is a process of understanding the sequence of transformation.
To do this, we try to understand the differences between object
A and objective B. These understandings lead us to the choice of
operations. Those operations which will add to the transformation
process will be retained, those which will diminish the process
will be eliminated.
I believe
that we can come to some understanding of our "reality problem"
in this way. I would suggest that the "aliens" demonstrate
adherence to the process described above, but with time travel capabilities,
it is possible for them to effect their manipulations in such a
way that we have great difficulty perceiving them. With a broad
historical perspective, careful examination of the cycles and events
within the cycles, we can SEE the fingerprints of these elusive
"controllers" of our reality. We can see human beings
as the "objects," and the events of history as the "operations."
When we observe these things, the events of history and how they
have affected humanity, and where humanity is today as opposed to
"yesterday," we begin to have a clue that we certainly
are "not in Kansas anymore!"
What
is even more interesting is that we come across some of those very
strange periods in history where a great darkness descends and before
this darkness mankind was going in one direction, and after this
period, he is going in an altogether different direction. You probe
into these periods, and you discover that very strange things were
going on. Not only that, you discover that a seemingly concerted
effort was made afterward to assure that documentation of the period
was destroyed to as great an extent as possible. In other words,
somebody was busy on a "global" scale, and whatever they
were doing, they definitely did not want it made public! Two of
these periods, within the historical period, really stand out. The
first is the time in which the "national history" of the
Jews was supposedly in full development. The second is the period
of the transition from paganism to Christianity. Both of these periods
are called "Dark Ages." Maybe that should give us pause!
The idea that mankind is being manipulated and controlled like an
"experiment" then becomes not merely what the Cassiopaeans
are telling us, but also what we can see ourselves if we exert the
effort and care to LOOK.
The
point of all this is that it seems that the only criteria we may
have by which to judge any phenomenon is the fruit it bears, since
it is possible for things to be represented as positive and not
be so, in fact. But in this case, the "fruit" can only
be seen in a very broad historical perspective.
To
synopsize: An alien presence has been noted at many points in history
of great disaster or mass death and cultural darkness. Examination
of the few records and documents has led some scholars and researchers
to conjecture that many of history's Darkest Hours have been CREATED
by the alien presence. The Laws of Probability tell us that, without
any intelligent control, 50% of the time events would occur leading
to great good and benefit. Factoring in intelligent decisions to
do good would bring this average up to about 70% Yet we can clearly
see that this is not reflected in our reality. Why not? Who or what
is influencing things to the negative?
One
answer that we are given is the ever popular New Age "channeled"
teaching that the reason things are so bad is because we were an
"experiment in Free Will" that went bad. We have screwed things
up so badly that now we need help to haul ourselves out of the soup.
And, the aliens, in their infinite wisdom and mercy are going to
do that for us if we will just "let" them! Further, if we just think
nice thoughts, nothing bad will ever enter our reality. And we must
not look at evil because it just doesn't exist unless we believe
in it! This is a dangerous and cunning lie. What better way to protect
the forces of "Darkness" at higher levels than to deny their existence?
My
work as a hypnotherapist has shown me that the vast majority of
people want to do good, to experience good things, think
good thoughts, and make decisions with good results. And they try
with all their might to do so! With the majority of people having
this internal desire, why the hell isn't it happening? Without
exception in my experience, individuals who have had "abductions,"
when the surface or screen memories have been probed in a competent
way, these individuals reveal memories of events so chilling in
their implications that the "love and light" interpretation
must be looked at carefully. Yet, the Aliens somehow convince the
experiencer that it is "for their good" or for "the good of the
planet" or "the enhancement of our race."
Q:
(L) The whole point of this article is to say that ET's who abduct
people are here to help us evolve and that it is only us, if we
have dark and dirty unconscious minds, who perceive them as negative.
A: Wrong, you do not need "help" evolving, nor does anything else.
What
does this mean for us in practical terms, here, on earth, today?
It means that Alien intelligences, throughout history have very
possibly controlled and influenced the leaders of our societies
to guide us down a particular, chosen pathway; chosen by them. They
are here; they are playing "cat and mouse" with us to
keep us confused and off balance. They are feeding philosophical
lies and distortions into our culture to lead as many astray as
possible. They control many of the lions of industry, government
and culture so that what exists in our world is perverted by a "twist,"
a peculiar upside-down, disjointed, askew perspective governed by
deception and falsehood. We are living in a frightful, topsy-turvy
world where everything we instinctively cherish as good,
noble, honest and right has been disrupted, soiled, deformed and
made ugly. And, more horrible than this, we accept it as normal!
This
"Control System," this infrastructure is a subtle, goal-seeking
phenomenon and it is our purpose here to discover that goal. The
Cassiopaeans have given us many clues, but the answers are up to
us to figure out. And we are not just interested in finding out
the goal, we are interested in finding out our "proper response"
to it.
If
what the Cassiopaeans are saying is NOT true, will we lose anything
by entertaining the possibility? Is Truth so fragile that it cannot
withstand scrutiny? And if what the Cassiopaeans are saying IS true,
what might we lose if we DON'T consider it as possible?
On
the one hand, the above correspondent is clearly saying that he
believes there are "dark forces" that seek to deceive
and bind us. But, would those very "dark forces" do this
by telling us that there ARE dark forces that are seeking to deceive
and bind us? As noted, that is logically inconsistent.
On
the other hand, what must we think about the many "Forces of
Light" who say there ARE NO Dark Forces except in our minds;
that WE create them by believing in them? (Naturally, putting the
onus for the creation of darkness on mankind!) They say that if
we cease our participation in belief in Darkness, that it will be
"overcome" and made null and void. One New Age writer
put it this way:
"Evil
is energy out of sync with the creator..."
Logic
tells us that anything "out of sync" with the Creator or Creation
would, of necessity, imply error on the part of the Creator which
would lead to the conclusion that the "creator" is, himself,
limited in omniscience or omnipotence, which then leaves us in an
even worse ontological dilemma than before.
This
writer goes on to say that evil is:
...Energy
that was cast off from humankind's energy when we first learned
how to establish ourselves as spiritually apart from the all-life.
It is an accidental creation. ...The energy of evil... comes from
the human race.
Well,
heck! Let's just blame it on Eve, why don't we?!
I repeat:
it is logically inconsistent to posit an All-knowing, All-Loving
Omnipotent Creator,and then to suggest either accident or
rebellion. But how else can we explain it?
How
can we understand the apparent fact that we are in an environment
that seems to be designed to imprison us; to make us little more
than cattle kept in a pen to feed ravening monsters from hyper-dimensional
space that we can't even, for God's sake, comprehend, much less
resist?! If we don't call it a "mistake" or a "fault"
or an "error," what are we going to do with it? By seeing
it as a "mistake," we at least give ourselves the hope
of changing it, or believing in some Messiah who has "taken
the fault" away from us, so we don't have to bear the guilt
for the aeons of suffering of mankind that we observe. But that
is a costly solution in the long run because it leads to ontological
answers that are unbearable. But if we have arrived at the point
where we can no longer support the inconsistencies of such a view,
we are left with the deeper question of how can we understand the
ontological existence of such a state?
In
other words, if what we perceive to be Darkness and Evil or Service
to Self is NOT a mistake, is NOT an error, is NOT something that
can or should be "fixed" in the realm of creation, then
WHAT is it? How can we ontologically justify it? Or, leaving side
justification, how can we just simply understand it?
One
thing we note at the beginning here is that the Cassiopaeans have
said that human beings chose to experience this reality for a REASON.
Q:
(L) Are human beings entrapped in physical matter?
A: By choice.
Q: (L) Why did they make this choice?
A: To experience physical sensations. It was a group mind
decision.
Q: (L) Who was in charge of the group?
A: The group. ...It must also be mentioned here that everything
that exists in all realms of the universe can experience existence
in one of only two ways. That would be defined as a long wave cycle
and a short wave cycle. Going back to your previous question about
why humans are "entrapped" in physical existence, which, of course,
is voluntary and chosen, this was due to the desire to change from
the long wave cycle experience of completely what you would call
ethereal or spiritual existence, to the short wave cycle of what
you call physical existence. The difference is that a long wave
cycle involves only very gradual change in evolution in a cyclical
manner. Whereas a short wave cycle involves a duality. ...The
necessity to form the short wave cycle was brought about through
nature through the natural bounds of the universe when the group
mind of souls chose to experience physicality as opposed to a completely
ethereal existence. ...The positive byproduct is an increase
in relative energy which speeds up the learning process of the soul
and all of it's one dimensional and two dimensional interactive
partners. In other words, flora and fauna, minerals, etc. All
experience growth and movement towards reunion at a faster rate
on the cycle through this short wave cycle physical/ethereal transfer.
In
our overview of the conditions of the reality in which we live,
we are forced to think in new ways about "purpose." How
can it be "good" to live in such an environment? Sure,
it's fine and dandy to say that "all experience growth... at
a faster rate," and all that, but what does that really mean
when we are faced with some of the factors we have been discussing
in these pages? And remember, we have not been talking about just
channelled material - we have been collecting facts and observations
all through this examination of our reality. And, because of the
many letters I receive from readers, I can assure you that it is
not just "my reality," or even just a "minority"
reality. It's a FACT, as don Juan would say; "and a damn scary
one!"
Many
individuals in the present time are convinced that the "New
Age" paradigm is going to unite all of humanity into one big
happy family with the amalgamation of the "common threads"
of belief that run through all the great religions. They point to
the messages from this or that source that claim that this is the
great plan that was put into place by higher beings millennia ago,
so that all different types of human beings could grow to maturity,
each in their own ideal environment, much as different areas of
a garden are more or less suitable for different types of plants.
Very
often, such people cite the "great new research" that
supports this view, that man is "creating a new reality."
It's a nice idea if it works, but the Devil, as always, is in the
details. Paul von Ward writes in The
Solarian Legacy:
"...Patterns
are created by consciousness that have the power to shape apparent
nothingness into tiny quanta of something. ...The use of conscious
intent is a more effective route to human participation in a creative
life process, including maintaining health, than purely mechanical
manipulation. ...Modern research evidence has been found to support
the conclusions of many cultural traditions that human consciousness
communicates with and influences the behavior of other life forms.
...Assuming
there is an ongoing, reciprocal flow of such behavior-influencing
communications among local concentrations of mind (animals, plants,
and individual cells), how does the conscious being deliberately
intervene in the natural flow to bring about a desired end? The
answer - at this point an intuitive one - involves a clarity of
focus grounded in definite emotions. The process appears to work
in a manner analogous to the progression from "gas"
through "liquids" to "solids," i.e., from
"amorphous" through "evolving" to "definite."
[Paul Von Ward, The
Solarian Legacy, 1998]
So
far, so good, right? We can see (though this is greatly abbreviated)
that there seems to be a real principle behind the idea "you
create your own reality." So, let's keep going here:
After
someone had the first "clear" idea of a candle, it entered
the "potential" phase as soon as there was real intent
to create. The movement to gather materials placed the pattern
in the "becoming" phase. The "actualization"
phase of the idea was ignited by fire. The same sequential process
applies to all fields of human life: agriculture, food preparation,
health, psychokinesis, sports, politics, or economics. The idea
of democracy first starts with clarity about a few basic assumptions.
Only when a number of individuals attach emotional support to
the ideas does democracy have real potential. That emotional energy
translated to action results in the practice of democracy. A vision
of health must be underpinned by emotional commitment in order
for the cells to get the message to do their part and for the
individual to eat appropriately. To facilitate the bending of
metal through conscious intent, one focuses the idea on the metal,
the metal's atoms become agitated, and when as a result the material
softens, only a slight pressure will bend it.
Recognizing
the power of this natural process, it is foolish to assume specific
limits to creative powers exist in natural law until they have
been tested and re-tested. Currently perceived constraints may
actually be due to false or limited interpretations of cosmic
law. If a clearly focused thought is more than a fleeting mind
game, emotionally energized to a level of potential, will it be
realized? Or, are there certain thoughts that cannot be actualized
in space-time? When we learn the answers to these questions, we
will realize our fuller power as cosmic beings.
...Given
the research highlighted here, and similar work, it is now justifiable
for a prudent person to accept that mind does communicate with
and influence matter at the subatomic and cellular levels. Through
the mechanism of thought, consciousness or mind likely shapes
reality in more ways than we can currently conceive. [Ibid.]
Mr.
Ward has synopsized the popular view of the "New Thought"
movement incepted in the nineteenth century. But, he has also pointed
out certain problems that most people who hear the basic idea of "you
create your own reality" do NOT notice. They "hear"
an idea which appeals to their emotions, and don't pay much attention
to the caveats. Mr. von Ward continues:
It
is important to remember, however, that human consciousness -
individually and collectively - can shape microcosmic reality
only within limits, due to certain characteristics of our phenomenal
realm. One of these limits appears to be the direction of
the stream of arrow of time. ...This seems to indicate that
we cannot arbitrarily change the nature of a phenomenon while
a particular directionality is maintained. To change a vector
(velocity combined with magnitude and direction) of anything requires
the application of a greater force. ...Only a power beyond
our universe can mitigate the influence of its inherent arrow
of time. [Ibid.]
Hmmm...
have we discovered something here? Mr. Ward has given definite indications
that it is not quite as easy as the YCYOR folks would like to believe.
Let's go back to a clue the Cassiopaeans gave:
...The
necessity to form the short wave cycle was brought about through
nature through the natural bounds of the universe when the group
mind of souls chose to experience physicality as opposed to a
completely ethereal existence. ...It was a group mind
decision.
Right
here we have some clue to the restrictions on "creating your
own reality." If an individual seeks to do so in opposition
to the "natural bounds of the universe," which is a
manifestation of the "group mind" decision, they are
going to run into some serious problems.
Q:
(L) At one point we were told that time was an illusion that came
into being at the "time" of the "Fall" in Eden, and this was said
in such a way that I inferred that there were other illusions
put into place at that time...
A: Time is an illusion that works for you because of your altered
DNA state.
Q: (L) Okay, what other illusions?
A: Monotheism, the belief in one separate, all powerful entity.
Q: (T) Is separate the key word in regard to Monotheism?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is another one of the illusions?
A: The need for physical aggrandizement.
Q: (L) What is another of the illusions?
A: Linear focus.
Q: (L) Anything else at this time?
A: Unidimensionality.
Q: (L) The veil... (J) The perception of only one dimension...
(L) Were these illusions programmed into us genetically through
our DNA?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us a little bit about how these illusions
are enforced on us, how they are perceived by us?
A: If someone opens a door, and behind it you see a pot of gold,
do you worry whether there is a poisonous snake behind the door
hidden from view, before you reach for the pot of gold?
Q: (L) What does the gold represent?
A: Temptation to limitation.
Q: Was limitation presented as a pot of gold when, in fact, it
was not?
A: What is snake?
Q: (T) The Lizards?
A: Result of giving into temptation without caution, i.e. leaping
before looking.
Q: (L) So what you are saying to us is that the story of the temptation
in Eden was the story of Humankind being led into this reality
as a result of being tempted. So, the eating of the fruit of the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was...
A: Giving into temptation.
Q: (L) And this was a trick...
A: No! Tricks don't exist!
Q: (T) Okay, no trick, a trap?
A: No! Traps don't exist either. Free will could not be abridged
if you had not obliged.
Q: (T) Now wait a minute. I am losing the whole train here. What
were we before the "Fall?"
A: 3rd density STO.
Q: (T) We were 3rd density STO at this time. Was this after the
battle that had transpired?
A: Was battle.
Q: (L) The battle was in us?
A: Through you.
Q: (T) Okay, we were STO at that point. You have said before that
on this density we have the choice of being STS or STO.
A: Oh Terry, the battle is always there, it's "when" you choose
that counts!
Q: (T) This must tie into why the Lizards and other aliens keep
telling people that they have given their consent for abduction
and so forth. We were STO and now we are STS.
A: Yes, continue.
Q: (T) We are working with the analogy. The gold was an illusion.
The gold was not what we perceived it to be. It was a temptation...
A: No temptation, it was always there. Remember Dorothy and the
Ruby slippers?
Q: (T) Okay, we were STO at that time, before we stepped through.
We didn't have to step through. It's always there.... (J) It's
there now... (T) The Lizards...
A: Yes, think of the Ruby slippers. What did Glenda tell Dorothy???
Q: (L) You have always had the power to go home...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, we always have the power to return to being STO? Even
in 3rd density?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) The door has always been there. The temptation has
always been there... (J) Is there... (T) Has, is, will be... is
always.
A: "When" you went for the gold, you said "Hello" to the Lizards
and all that that implies.
Q: (T) So, the concept is that, as STO beings we had the choice
of either going for the gold or not. By going for the gold, we
became STS beings because going for the gold was STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And, in doing so, we ended up aligning ourselves with the
4th density Lizard Beings...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because they are 4th density beings and they have a lot
more abilities than we at 3rd density...
A: You used to be aligned with 4th density STO.
Q: (T) But, by going for the gold we aligned ourselves with 4th
density STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And by doing so we gave 4th density STS permission to do
whatever they wish with us?
A: Close.
Q: (T) So, when they tell us that we gave them permission to abduct
us, it is this they are referring to?
A: Close.
Q: (J) Go back to what they said before: "Free will could not
be abridged if you had not obliged." (T) We, as the human race,
used our free will to switch from STO to STS. (L) So, at some
level, at some point, we have chosen the mess we are in. We fell
by falling into that door, so to speak, going after the pot of
gold, and when we fell through the door, the serpent bit us!
A: But this is a repeating syndrome.
Q: (L) Is it a repeating syndrome just for the human race or is
it a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation?
A: It is the latter.
Q: (L) Is this a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation
simply because it is the cyclic nature of things? Or is it as
the Indians call it, Maya?
A: Either or.
So,
again we come up against the issue of the constraints against creating
our reality. We have chosen the "school" we wished to enter,
and the NATURAL bounds of this school are the STS/Drachomonoid control
system. As 3rd density beings aligned with Service to Self beings,
we have CHOSEN these constraints. We agreed to have our free will
"abridged."
Q:
(D) I have a question about... Mankind has found it necessary
for some reason or other to appoint time for some reason or other.
The only reason I can see is to have a means of telling, like
in verbal or written communications...
A: Control mechanism.
Q: (T) Is there a way for us to break the control mechanism? Besides
moving to 4th density?
A: Nope.
Now,
just exactly what is the "Pot of Gold" used in the analogy
above? What "event" brought about the "Fall"
from alignment with Service to Others to Service to Self?
Well,
the designations "STO" and "STS" give us a clue.
But, there is more. At several points I returned to this issue for
clarification, and I hope that my efforts will help to make it clearer
for others:
Q:
(L) Where did the souls come from that entered into the bodies
on the planet earth? Were they in bodies on other planets before
they came here?
A: Not this group.
Q: (L) Were they just floating around in the universe somewhere?
A: In union with the One. Have you heard the Super ancient legend
of Lucifer, the Fallen Angel?
Q: (L) Who is Lucifer?
A: You. The human race.
Q: (L) Are the souls of individual humans the parts of a larger
soul?
A: Yes. Close. The One. All who have fallen must learn "the hard
way." You are members of a fragmented soul unit.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the act of wanting to experience physical
reality is the act of falling? What is it about wanting to be
physical is a "fall"?
A: Pleasure for the self.
Q: (L) Prior to the Fall, did, the human race live in an Edenic
state, where they were able to use bodies and still have a spiritual
connection?
A: Yes. But not long. No addiction takes long to close the circle.
Q: (L) So, mankind was addicted to pleasuring the self?
A: Became quickly.
Q: (L) How long from the time of the moving of souls into bodies
did the "Fall" in Eden occur?
A: Not measurable. Remember Laura, there is no time when this
event occurred. Time passage illusion did not exist at that point
as well as many other falsehoods.
Q: (L) So you are saying that the Fall in Eden was also the beginning
of time?
A: Yes.
So,
here we have a little bit of a clue. "Pleasure for the self."
But this remark does not mean that "pleasure," in and of
itself, is strictly Service to Self. It became more clear with further
questions:
Q:
(L) Does it hurt a plant when we eat it?
A: Does it hurt you when a "Lizzie" eats you?
Q: (D) If we hurt plants by eating them like the Lizzies hurt
us when they eat us, how are we to survive without eating?
A: When you no longer crave physicality, you no longer need to
"eat."
Q: (L) So part of the "fall" into the physical existence and part
of the Fall from Eden story where it says "you shall eat by the
sweat of your brow," has to do with being physical and needing
to eat?
A: Lucifer, "The fallen Angel." This is you.
Q: (L) So, "falling" means going into physical existence wherein
you must feed on other life, other beings, is that it?
A: Yes.
Now,
we need to remember the story of Lucifer, that he was an Angel of
great beauty and glory. The Cassiopaeans have suggested that the
legend of Orion is closest to the original version of the story.
Cassiopaeans:
In this part of your 3rd and 4th density universe, specifically
your "galaxy" it is the region known as Orion that is the one and
only indigenous home of human type beings... reflect on this! Indigenous
home base, not sole locator. ...Approximately one half is STO and
one half is STS. ...Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral
home, and your eventual destination. ...The name "Orion" is the
actual native name, and was brought to earth directly. Study the
legend of the "god" of Orion for parallels.
I am
not going to go into a full scale analysis of the Orion legend here,
but I will give the fullest account I have been able to put together
so that the reader can play with the concepts as we go along. According
to Edith
Hamilton, it goes like this:
He
was a young man of gigantic stature and great beauty, and a mighty
hunter. He fell in love with the daughter of the King of Chios,
and for love of her he cleared the island of wild beasts. The
spoils of the chase he brought always home to his beloved, whose
name is sometimes said to be Aero, sometimes Merope (one of the
Pleiades). Her father, Oenopion, agreed to give her to Orion,
but he kept putting the marriage off. One day when Orion was drunk
he insulted the maiden, and Oenopion appealed to Dionysus to punish
him. The god threw him into a deep sleep and Oenopion blinded
him. An oracle told him, however, that he would be able to see
again if he went tot he east and let the rays of the rising sun
fall on his eyes. He went as far east as Lemnos and there he recovered
his sight.
A
more complex treatment derived from several ancient sources goes as
follows:
The
parentage of Orion has been matter of dispute, but some have said
that Orion's father Hyrieus, son of Poseidon and his mother was
Alcyone, one of the Pleiades. It was said that Hyrieus' father,
Poseidon, came to visit him accompanied by Zeus and Hermes. Hyrieus
sacrificed a bull for the occasion. To show honor to Hyrieus for
his hospitality, the gods offered Hyrieus a gift of his choosing.
Hyrieus was a very rich but childless, so he asked his visitors
for a child. The gods urinated in the hide of the sacrificed bull,
buried it in the earth and from it Orion was born. In time Orion
grew tall as a giant, and he was granted by Poseidon, his grandfather,
(or father in some versions) the power of walking on water.
Orion
fell in love with Merope, the daughter of King Oenopion of Chios,
son of Ariadne and Theseus or Dionysus. But her father disliked
the idea and he made Orion drunk, put out his eyes as he slept,
and then cast him on the beach. Others have said, however, that
Orion came to Chios and, having drunk heavily, raped the girl,
this being the reason why he was blinded and expelled from the
island. He then came to Lemnos, where Hephaestus gave him his
servant Cedalion to serve him as a guide. Orion set him on his
shoulders and bade him lead him to the sunrise, and when they
arrived Orion was healed by the sun's rays.
Orion
believed himself to be the best of hunters and once said that
he was able to kill anything the earth produced. It was then that
Gaia (Earth), angered at this boast, sent the Scorpion that killed
him. But others have said that Orion was killed by Artemis who
was challenged by Apollo to shoot an arrow into a black object
in the sea, which she could not see, and that later was discovered
to be Orion's head. How the goddess could commit such a mistake
has not been explained. Still others say that Orion was killed
for challenging Artemis to a match of quoits, or shot by her for
raping Opis, one of the maidens who had come from the Hyperboreans.
But others have believed that Orion died because the gods were
jealous that Orion was the lover of Eos. For this, they allowed
Artemis to kill him.
Orion
was seen by Odysseus when he descended to the Underworld. Apparently,
down there he had the same occupation as when he was on earth:
"...I
marked huge Orion driving together over the Plain of Asphodel
wild beasts which himself had slain on the lonely hills, and in
his hands he held a club all of bronze, ever unbroken..." [Odysseus.
Homer, Odyssey
11.542]
Yet
Orion is considered to be immortal since he was placed among the
stars by Artemis, who mourned him. To prevent him being alone
in the sky, the Dog (Canis Major) was later added to the stars
to keep Orion company in his hunting.
The
proposed parentage of Orion is as follows:.
a)
Poseidon & Euryale. Euryale was said to be the daughter of King
Minos of Crete.
b)
Hyrieus & Clonia. Hyrieus owned a treasure inside a building built
by Trophonius and Agamedes, which had a stone that they could
take away from the outside, thus robbing him, until one of them
was caught in a trap made by Hyrieus. Clonia was one of the NYMPHS.
c)
Bull's hide
d)
Gaia (by herself)
It's
easy to see how the legend would be transposed into the Biblical
story of Lucifer, and why there would be associations with the "Morning
Star," or the act of letting the first rays of sunlight, the
Goddess Aurora, fall upon his eyes for healing.
But,
it is interesting that the same images that were presented in the
allegory given by Jesus about the "strong man" being "bound"
or cast into a deep sleep, and "blinded" by demons are
also present in the story of Orion. Perhaps it was a deliberate
allusion to Orion?
The
story of Osiris being tricked into his coffin by Set is another
variation of the strong man being "bound," though in this
case, we have the additional detail of the body being ultimately
dismembered which seems to be the allegory of the "fragmented
soul unit." The constellation of Orion is known as Osiris by
the Egyptians, and the "dog companion" is his sister-wife,
Isis.
But,
the issue here is: how did Orion "take the fall?" It is
said that he got drunk and insulted or raped the maiden whom he
loved. Afterwards, he was then "made drunk" or was "put
into a deep sleep" during which his eyes were put out. Whatever
it was, apparently he was not in full possession of his senses as
a "hunter" when he was put out for the "operation."
The
story also is reflected in the Biblical legend of Samson and Delilah.
Samson was a Nazarite with a vow to never cut his hair. Delilah
had him"sleep upon her knees" and while he was sleeping,
she called a man to come and "shave off the seven braids of
his hair." And his strength went from him. He was taken and
his eyes were put out. The clear connection of this to the Orion
legend makes it altogether likely that this is merely the Hebrew
variation of a very ancient story! I was curious about this "hair
business," so I asked:
Q:
I have an idea relating to the ancient gods and heroes... they
all had these massive amounts of hair, and it seemed that cutting
off the hair caused them to lose their strength in some way. Was
this totally symbolic, or was it actually believed that they had
to grow their hair?
A: Symbolic.
Q: What was the hair symbolic of?
A: Virility.
So
Samson was deprived of his "virility" by losing his hair.
For all we know, losing one's hair could be an ancient euphemism
for having an orgasm! Maybe in the weakened condition after this
"petit mort," one is less aware and therefore more susceptible
to being "put into a sleep" or made drunk again.
To
be drunk, or intoxicated, is to be in a condition where one has
lost control over one's faculties. It is also a term that means
"overcome by emotion." Do we have another clue here? Well,
I asked more questions:
Q:
I have this book, Confessions
of an Intergalactic Anthropologist, by a woman named
Marcia Schafer. One thing she says is [reads]: "the snake is associated
with the sign of wisdom and higher learning, and is often regarded
quite highly in mystical circles." I would like to have a comment
on the idea of the snake as a "sign of wisdom and higher learning."
Does this, in fact, represent what the snake symbolizes?
A: Snake is/was reported in context of the viewpoint of the observer.
Maybe the observer was just "blown away" by the experience. If
you were living in the desert, or jungle, about 7,000 years ago,
as you measure time, would you not be impressed if these Reptoid
"dudes" came down from the heavens in silvery objects and demonstrated
techno-wonders from thousands of years in the future, and taught
you calculus, geometry and astrophysics to boot?!?
Q: Is that, in fact, what happened?
A: Yup.
Q: As I understand it, or as I am trying to figure it out from
the literature, prior to the 'Fall in Eden,' mankind lived in
a 4th density state. Is that correct?
A: Semi/sort of. 4th density in another realm, such as time/space
continuum, etc.
Remember
that they have already said that we were formerly 3rd density "aligned"
with STO 4th density. This suggests that to be 3rd density STO and
in "contact" with 4th density STO entails significant
positive interaction and "bleedthrough" between the two
densities as suggested above! A very different realm indeed!
Q:
(L) Could you describe to me the true meaning of the Osirian cycle?
What was the symbology of the killing of Osiris and the cutting
up of the body?
A: Removal of knowledge centers in your DNA.
Q: (L) So, the breaking up of Osiris' body represents the breaking
up of the DNA in our bodies?
A: Partly. Also means knowledge capacity reduction.
Q: (L) What was the symbology of the throwing of the phallus into
the river and it's being eaten by three fishes?
A: Sexual violence energy introduction.
Q: (L) What did Isis searching for her lord Osiris symbolize?
A: Separation of female energy from male energy union.
Q: (L) Does this have anything to do with brain activity?
A: Yes. The separating of the hemispheres of the brain.
Q: (L) Was this achieved through DNA modification?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What did the son of Isis, Horus, represent?
A: New reality of limitation.
Q: (L) What is the meaning of Horus avenging himself upon Set, the
murderer of his father, Osiris?
A: Beginning of perpetual conflict energy to limit humanity.
Q: (L) Who did Set represent?
A: War.
Q:
Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various choices
were made: the human race went through the door after the 'gold,'
so to speak, and became aligned with the 4th density STS faction
after the 'right brain/female energy' consorted with the wrong
side, so to speak. This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking
up of the DNA, the burning off of the first ten factors of DNA,
the separation of the hemispheres of the brain...
A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you're gonna get
dirty.
Q: What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What
essential thing occurred? You said once that it was 'desire based
imbalance.' What was it a desire for?
A: Increased physicality.
Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased
physicality?
A: Sensate.
"Sensate,"
is derived from a Latin word, "sentire," which means "feel."
This suggests not merely physical sensations, but also emotions. The
root of the Latin word is, curiously, the Indo-European root "sent,"
which means "to cause to go, to find out, to discover."
Q: How was sensate experienced so that these beings had an idea
that they could get more if they increased their physicality?
A: Not experienced, demonstrated.
Q: Demonstrated how, by who? Demonstrated in what way? Did they
say: 'here, try this!' Or did they demonstrate by showing or doing?
A: Closer to the latter. More like: "you could have this."
Q: What seemed to be so desirable about this increased physicality
when they said 'you can have this?'
A: Use your imagination!
Q: Was there any understanding, or realization of any kind, that
increased physicality could be like Osiris lured into his own
coffin by Set? That they would then slam the lid shut and nail
him in?
A: Obviously, such understanding was lacking.
Q: Sounds like a pretty naive bunch! Does the lack of this understanding
reflect a lack of knowledge?
A: Of course. But more, it is desire getting in the way of...
And
here we have another clue to the ways in which we can be manipulated:
DESIRE gets in the way of knowledge! But, we will come back to this.
Q:
Okay. The 'Fall' occurred. It seems like, and some of the archaeological
studies indicate, that for many thousands of years, there was
a peaceful existence and a nice agrarian society where the goddess
or female creative forces were worshipped. At least, this is what
a lot of present-day books are proposing...
A: No. These events took place 309000 years ago, as you measure
it. This is when the first prototype of what you call "modern
man" was created. The controllers had the bodies ready, they just
needed the right soul matrix to agree to "jump in."
And
this brings up a very interesting solution to particular problems
in terms of the Reptilians being touted as the "bringers of
civilization" and their association with the Goddess religions,
promoted in the present time as being the "peaceful, partnership"
way of agricultural paradise. Apparently, that was not exactly the
case.
If
we remember the story of Cain and Abel, we find the original conflict
between the shepherd and the agriculturalist. Cain and Abel, being
the two sons of Adam and Eve who have been "cast out of Eden,"
merely symbolize the two main forms that the "control system"
took in order to perpetuate conflict. Both ways contain within them
implicit "ownership" of something, either cattle or land,
and both suggest the use and manipulation of the earth for their
own benefit, and to the detriment of the Great Mother. The only
reason Abel was glorified by the Hebrews was because it was THEIR
way of life. But that leads to another whole line of investigation,
so we will leave it for now.
Q: So, prior to this time, this prior Edenic state...
A: Was more like 4th density.
Q: But that implies that there was some level of physicality.
Was there physicality in the sense of bodies that look like present-day
humans?
A: Not quite.
Q: Does this mean that the the bodies we possibly would metamorphose
into as 4th density beings, assuming that one does, would also
be too complex for us to understand? You are saying that this
'sort of 4th density' pre-Fall state, or 3rd density aligned with
4th density STO, in terms of the physical bodies, is too complex
to understand. If going back to 4th density is anything like coming
from 4th density, does that mean that what we would go back to
is something that is still too complex to understand? This variability
of physicality that you have described?
A: Yes.
Q: So, was there any kind of worship of God, or religious activity
in this pre-Fall state; this Edenic, semi- 4th density state?
A: No need when one has a clue.
Q: What I am trying to get at here, what I am trying to understand,
is the transition from the goddess worship to the god worship;
the change from the understanding of cyclical time as expressed
in the feminine cycles, and expressed as the goddess; to the concept
of linear time, expressed as the masculine principle. It seems
to me that these were stages of inversion of concepts which gradually
led to the ideas that have been imposed on us, and it seems that
bringing these ideas to fruition is a project 4th density STS
beings have been working toward for millennia - the dominator
experience which expresses as: "believe in something outside
yourself that will save you, otherwise you are damned because
the world is gonna end, and you are going to get judged."
That is the whole monotheistic concept I am trying to deal with
here. Okay, we had these guys; they fell from Eden, but they were
still fairly close to the original concepts, in some terms. Once
they jumped into the physical bodies, as you put it, what was
their level of conceptualization regarding the universe? Did they
still retain some understanding at that point?
A: Kind of like the understanding one has after severe head trauma,
vis a vis your normal understanding in your current state.
Q: So, they were traumatized; they may have had bits and pieces
of ideas and memories, but they may also have lost a great deal
altogether. They may have had big gaps. There may have even been
a sort of "coma" state of mankind for many millennia. But, after
they woke up, with the bits and pieces floating around in their
heads, they may have begun to attempt to piece it all together.
So, they started putting it all back together. What was the first
thing they put together regarding the cosmos around them?
A: Sex.
Q: What did they decide about sex? I mean, sex was there. They
were having sex. Is that it? Or, did they understand the cosmos
as sex?
A: More like the former. After all, that is what got you guys
in this mess in the first place! Just imagine the sales job if
you can: "Look how much fun this is! Want to try it?!? Oops, sorry,
we forgot to tell you, you cannot go back!"
Q: I really fail to understand - and I know it is a big issue
that has been hinted at and alluded to, and outright claims have
been made regarding sex in all religions and mythologies - but
I fail to understand the mechanics of how this can be the engineering
of a 'fall.' What, precisely, are the mechanics of it? What energy
is generated? How is it generated? What is the conceptualization
of the misuse of this energy, or the use of the energy?
A: It is simply the introduction of the concept of self-gratification
of a physical sort.
Q: On many occasions you have said that the ideal thing is to
have perfect balance of physicality and spirituality. Now, I don't
understand how it can be that gratification of a physical body
can be the mechanics by which one is entrapped. Is it not gratifying
to look at something beautiful? Is it wrong, sinful, or a form
of a fall, to look at beauty, to hear something beautiful such
as music, or to touch something that is sensually delightful such
as a piece of silk or the skin of a loved one? These various things
that the human being derives pleasure from very often elevate
them to a spiritual state.
A: Possession is the key. In STS, you possess. If you move
through the beautiful flowers, the silk, the skin of another,
but do not seek to possess...
Q: It seems to me that it is possible to experience all of these
things, including sex, without the need or desire to possess;
only to give. In which case, I still don't understand how it can
be a mechanism for a 'fall.'
A: If it is desired, then the mechanism is not to give.
Do you eat a piece of chocolate cake because it is good to give
to the stomach? In STS, which is your realm do not forget, one
gives because of the pleasant sensation which results.
Q: Could it not be said that, if everything that exists is part
of God, including the flesh, that if one gives to the flesh, without
being attached to the giving, that it could be considered a giving
to the 'All?'
A: Explain the process.
Q: For example: at one extreme there are some people who like
to suffer, because they believe that the flesh is sinful. For
centuries the monotheistic religions have made this big deal about
sex and anything that might be considered pleasant or desirable,
that it should be denied, and that a person should suffer, and
revel in their suffering.
A: If one seeks to suffer, they do so in expectation of future
reward. They desire to possess something in the end.
Q: What I am saying is: if a person can avoid self aggrandizement
in either direction, and to simply BE, in the doing and being
of who and what they are, in simplicity; to become involved in
doing everything as a meditation, or as a consecration, whether
they are walking down the street and being at one with the air,
the sunshine, the birds and trees and other people; in this state
of oneness, doesn't that constitute a giving to the universe as
giving oneself up as a channel for the universe to experience
all these things?
A: Not if one is "feeling this oneness" rather than BEing it.
Q: Well, if people would just relax and be who and what they are
in honesty, and do what is according to their nature without violating
the Free Will of others, is this is a more pure form of being
than doing things out of any feeling of expectation, or desire;
to just BE, not want... just BE?
A: Yes, but STS does not do that.
So,
we see that the issue is not "sex" per se, or really anything
in specific about the 3rd density environment so much as it is a
certain "generation of emotion" via physical processes
that have to do specifically with "possession."
What
is it about DESIRE TO POSSESS that brought about a "Fall?"
Well,
let's just have a look at some other ideas here:
Q:
(L) What was the Fruit of the tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
that was supposedly eaten by Eve and then offered to Adam?
A: Knowledge restriction. Encoding. Eve is symbolic of Female
energy.
Q: (L) What did it mean when it said Eve, or the female energy,
ate of the fruit of the tree of knowledge. What act was this?
A: Consorted with wrong side.
Q: (L) What does consorted mean?
A: Lost some knowledge and power. Limitation. Conceptually
limited.
Q: (L) I want you to know that this does not make a whole lot
of sense.
A: Yes it does. Think carefully. Laura you are missing the obvious.
Q: (L) In what sense would the fruit of the tree of life be limiting?
A: Believing that one source contains all knowledge is contradicting
reality.
Q: (F) If the concept was the eating of the fruit of the tree
of knowledge provides all knowledge, then one is being deceived,
because no one particular source can provide all knowledge. Therefore,
when one believes in the deception, one has now trapped oneself
within parameters. And, forevermore, the human race, will be poisoned
by the very same problem which is reflected in several different
ways: one is always seeking the truth through one pathway instead
of seeking it through a myriad of pathways; and also believing
in simplistic answers to very complex issues and questions.
Q: (L) Where was Eden?
A: Earth.
Q: (L) The entire earth was Eden?
A: Yes.
Now,
we are getting somewhere. "Believing that one source contains
all knowledge is contradicting reality." It is "conceptually
limited."
Over
the years, many scientists have studied the effects of head and
brain injuries. These studies were aimed at understanding the physiological
and psychological effects and used a number of experiments to "map
the brain." The results have led to theories about two different
modes of thinking or "styles of thought," which are generally
attributed to the left and right hemispheres of the brain.
In
general, the left side of the brain controls the right side of the
body, and the right side of the brain controls the left side of
the body. According to the test results and the developing theory,
the right brain is most often associated with direct sensual experience
of the five sense organs as well as the "sixth sense"
of intuitive thinking. "Feelings" are also associated
with this side of the brain, and these feelings are often observed
to be the result of the person's "sensation" of the environment.
This "sensation" of the environment can be the external
world or the internal "state of being." Also, we must
note that the Right brain, as the Observer of the external and internal
environment, only perceives NOW.
The
Left Brain is associated with the process of CONCEPTUALIZATION and
IMAGINATION in its many forms, including the powers of symbolic
imagination and those functions related to the symbols we know as
language such as labeling, categorizing, following verbal rules
and rules in general. The left hemisphere mode of operation is much
like a computer screen on which the whole range of concepts of the
mind are portrayed and manipulated in the "mind's eye."
One of the main "concepts" we utilize is TIME as in Time
future and Time past. Have a look at the chart below to see how
the different hemisphere's seem to operate.
| Left
Hemisphere Consciousness |
Right
Hemisphere Consciousness |
| Conceptualization/imagination/dogma/TIME
future/TIME past |
Sensing/Perceiving
Directly via observation/Empiricism/NOW (no time) |
| Theoretical
imagination |
Physical
connection |
| Linear
logic |
Nonlinear
logic |
| Ritual/habit/fixed
roles/repetition/fixation |
Creativity/spontaneity |
| Morality/judgment |
C | |
