|
|
Chapter XXAll There is
is Lessons...
|
|
|
Now, aside from the bizarre way in which it was depicted, (i.e. being raped by a Reptoid), this "changing the program" was something I had heard before. To be more specific, in one of Candy's numerous sessions focused on regression to the time of purported alien abductions, such a remark was made, though the description of the event was quite different. It almost seemed that this "changing of the program" was a direct response to the interaction of these individuals with yours truly! Let's go back to the description of "Maryann/Candy" from the first section of this series so that the information about the "changing the program" from her hypnosis session will make sense. I will change the name references to "Candy" so that we don't get confused here. As I mentioned, when I started writing on the subject of The Wave, I just pulled a pseudonym out of the air to protect her privacy. I didn't realize that I would later include more of the "behind the scenes" information that would require a more careful selection of name. As you will remember, I wrote:
Now, having refreshed our memory on Candy's background, let me explain the circumstances behind the following hypnosis session. This will only touch on certain aspects of the case because it was a long and complicated situation. The obsession, or "Love Bite" situation, with the man who worked in the office building where Candy's husband was employed, and where she also had a position, was so out of control that Candy was desperate to find out the source of the almost insane fascination she had with this man. She KNEW she was behaving in a crazy way. She also knew that the constant fantasies, urges to seek him out under any pretext, to follow him or call him repeatedly on the phone were absolutely out of character for her. The explanation that she came up with was that it was DESTINY for her to be with him and that could be the only reason for this intense, internal drive she was struggling against. She was sure she KNEW him deeply, and even though she actually had very little interaction with him, she ascribed almost mystical significance to every word they did exchange. Every glance from his eyes was full of fire and cosmic power. Never mind that most of this occurred in the elevator or the halls or parking lot of the office building. She was certain that there was impossibly deep communication in every instant their eyes made contact! I listened to her talk about it endlessly, thinking it would eventually "run out" and she would see how irrational it was, but that didn't happen. She insisted that the "proof" of the destined nature of their inevitable union would be found under hypnosis. I privately thought that, if nothing else, it might "cure" her of the obsession; so I agreed. After the first incident when this man had taken Candy and her friend out to look for the Indian mound, she had maneuvered to "run into" him again. They "met" at a local pub, including her friend, "Eileen," who was Candy's source for info at the office. They ended up going for a ride to the woods - another act that was just totally out of character for all of them - and Candy was certain that something significant had happened there because, again, she had "missing time." All she remembered was driving out in a wooded area to look for a swimming hole that one of them had heard of, but when they got there, they found nothing and immediatly turned around and left. But a lot more time had passed than would have been required to just drive out there, turn around, and come back. The strange thing about this event was that Candy cried almost constantly for two days after this "drive in the woods," and could not explain to me or anybody why she was crying. All she knew was that she had a "great longing and sadness" for this man who was the object of her unrequited love. We are going to skip over all the induction process, the "setting up" of the "working environment," and just go right to the first question. [And we are going to call this guy Bill.]
At
this point in time, Candy's interest in Bill pretty much just "turned
off." She became obsessed with MF, the "UFO investigator" mentioned
in the previous section. I could see that, under the guise of "therapy,"
he was pursuing a physical relationship, and she began to behave completely
erratically. One clue to this new "obsession" was that she more
or less "abandoned" her children. On several occasions, the little one
called me and asked if her mother was at my house because she had barely
been at home for days and there was no food in the house. I could see and sense that there was this HUGE, overwhelming, sex thing going on between Candy and MF! (And, we have to remember that he was one of the ones the Cassiopaeans had designated as being a sort of "unconscious mole.") Soon after the above session, Candy called me in a state of complete hysteria. The previous night she had gone to dinner with MF. That night, after coming home from this date and going to bed in the normal way, she had a dream about some men coming in her house. She then said that she woke up in the morning feeling drugged and that her legs were sore behind the knees. When she looked, she saw that there were bruises on her legs. And, more than that, they were bruises that showed the clear imprint of a four fingered hand on the back of each leg! I had previously suggested to her that we talk to my Private Investigator friend, and now she was pretty desperate to get a handle on all of the things that had been happening. So, we met with the PI. After listening to the whole story and examining the bruises, the PI said that, in his opinion, the proper way to approach the matter was to treat it as a "crime," and look for some material evidence. During his questioning, Candy remembered the dress from the first "abduction" that was possibly still on the floor in her closet. The PI privately told me that bruises such as were on Candy's legs could be "manufactured" by a hysterical woman wanting attention, but it would be hard. He was as puzzled as I was as to what might be the explanation of bruises that clearly depicted a hand that was not human. He was also interested in getting some hard evidence and wanted to be present at the next hypnosis session so as to determine what direction to go with a real investigation. Candy agreed. She wanted it right away and, for some reason, didn't want MF, the hotshot UFO investigator there! Clearly she was at some level aware that her interactions with him might have had something to do with this latest incident. And, we were both feeling some relief that a "professional" was taking the whole thing seriously and was willing to devote time, talent and resources to the cause of "getting to the bottom of this." Regarding the dress that Candy thought was still in the closet, (never having been sent to the cleaners), the PI was going to try to make arrangements to send it to a forensics lab as possible evidence of a rape. He wasn't going to mention anything about "aliens" but leave it to the lab to do the standard work that would be done when trying to gather evidence to identify such an attacker - including such things as DNA profiling. She agreed to pick it up carefully and place it in a zipper bag and deliver it to me and I would convey it to him. We then scheduled the session for that evening.
The curious thing to me was that this "pain response" was exactly what had happened with my very first "alien abduction" case, the night of the Black Boomerang sightings over the three county area. The subject began to experience so much pain as I probed for the answers, that it became clear that, in spite of suggestions for comfort, that I should not continue. It was about a week after this session that Candy came and demanded the dress back because MF told her that HE could get it anlyzed by a REAL scientist who was sympathetic to the UFO investigations process. He told her that she shouldn't trust anybody connected to the "authorities" because if she turned the dress over to them, it would certainly "disappear" and her chances of ever knowing the truth would vanish with it. And, of course, by association, I was implicated as those who could not be trusted. It turned out that his "real scientist" was an undergrad chemistry student who worked part time at the county sewage treatment plant. There was nothing I could do to dissuade her and, by this time, I knew enough about MF to be thoroughly disgusted with the whole thing. It was clear that he was manipulating her and suggesting to her all kinds of negative things about me, and I learned a long time ago that I can't fight liars and manipulators. You have to be one to out-maneuver them. Shortly after this period, I began to hear rumors. A friend who knew MF called me and told me that he was telling people that I wanted to "get famous" writing a book about Candy's case - a "classic abduction with evidence" - and I was thus "using" her and her near psychotic state for my own aggrandizement. He, of course, on the other hand, was only trying to "help her get over the trauma;" never mind that he was seeking personal involvement with a person who was traumatized and, therefore, vulnerable. Needless to say, I was not only shocked by this, I was hurt. It was pretty clear that MF was the one who had an agenda. Maybe HE was driven to have a "perfect case" on which to ride to fame and glory and because that was HIS drama, he naturally thought it was everyone else's. On the other hand, maybe his motivations were inspired from some other source and were a lot more sinister. At this point, another friend had downloaded some info from a UFO Internet Bulletin board where it Candy's very case was the hot topic of discussion. In these exchanges between people who I didn't even know, nor had I ever met them, I was being described as a "fraud" and "incompetent" and "using the poor abducted victim for my own gain." No part of the description of the way the investigation was being handled by me was anywhere near accurate and it was obvious that someone was lying. The only one who was in a position to distort the facts in this way was MF. He knew enough about me and what I was doing to know better, unless, of course, he was being told things that were not true by Candy. I couldn't decide which I thought was most likely, but the end result was that I was FURIOUS! I learned that the person who had posted the info was the wife of the sewage treatment plant workerclaiming to be a "chemist" and "scientist" and "professional analyst." My friend told me that Candy had "taken up" with this woman in much the same way she had "taken up" with me. Further information came to me from an authoritative source (a onetime directof of a MUFON group) that MF, who Candy was now intimately involved with, had a very bad reputation. He had been a part of a large MUFON organization that, based on his claims to knowledge and expertise (having come to Florida from another state), had placed him in a position of trust and authority in their UFO Field Investigations unit. It soon became clear that he "did not work well with others," and, in fact, brought a great deal of negative publicity and attention to the organization. The MUFON group asked him to resign, but he refused. Having no alternative at that point, the entire group voted to dissolve their organization rather than continue with this man in their midst! He then attached himself to this couple who were so busily blackening my name in the local Metaphysical/UFO community (without, I must add, having ever met or talked with me!) Not only that, but this same couple were members of the bigger MUFON group in the Clearwater area and later attached themselves to Dr. Santilli as "research assistants." At this point in time, it is my thought that Dr. Santilli's "distancing" from our work was a direct result of the influence of this small group of "bad apples," so to speak. It is true that, (as I have recently learned), two of this group of individuals later became heads of the Clearwater MUFON after two others took over the publication of the MUFON newsletter from Terry and Jan Rodemerk. Since that time, it is said that the organization has pretty much "hit the skids" in terms of being a moving force in any kind of "hub of information" or help to others in the area who may have experienced sightings or abductions. A funny incident did occur at the last UFO conference I attended in Pensacola. Ark and I had attended a lecture by Whitley Strieber where he made a "heartfelt and anguished" plea to the "world of science" to bring all their minds and tools to bear on solving the problem of "the Visitors," as he coyly refers to them. Well, since Ark is a scientist with a pretty good reputation in international circles, and many publications in the reputable journals, as well as considered to be an expert in Riemannian Geometry and Kaluza-Klein theories about 10 dimensional space-time, we thought that he just MIGHT fit the category of the kind of scientists Whitley was crying for. So, we stood in a very long line after the lecture to speak to Mr. Strieber and offer help. As we were standing there, I heard a man speaking to someone behind me. He was saying something to the effect that he was a scientist and he REALLY needed to speak to Mr. Strieber privately. I turned around to see who it was, and - yup! You guessed it! It was our Sewage Treatment Expert! Oh well. And, of course, as it turned out, Mr. Strieber wasn't very interested in real science since he brushed us off with the excuse of how urgent it was to sign the books he was selling, and avoided us for the rest of the conference. So, there it is. It's nice to make heartfelt appeals when one is at the podium pretending to be really interested in getting the facts of the matter, but when one is actually faced with scientific scrutiny, it seems to be the last thing one wants to have focused on one's self! Better to have Sewage experts in the lab - they are far more qualified to analyze the BS that goes on in the UFO community. In retrospect, it is clear that the "changing" of the program Candy was sensing had to do with getting her away from me and my process of combining both intuitive AND scientific analysis. The obvious way to do this was to bring in "reinforcements," i.e. MF, and his cohorts. It was also not lost on me that, in both cases, the only "information channel" about ME, to both the Metaphysical Church bunch, and this MUFON bunch, was Candy herself. Whether it was conscious or unconscious I will never know. I only know that every interaction with her resulted in attack/lessons, lies and obfuscation, confusion and backstabbing. They were all busily talking about me and what a wicked person I was, but in fact, none of them knew me or had ever talked to me directly. Funny how that works! And, of course, Candy's obsession with Bill just sort of died right then. Remember Bill? The "soulmate?" The "Cosmic Destiny" guy? Ooops! That was yesterday! Today we have a new program to run! Whether Candy's "abductions" were real, we will never know. Whether her evidence was real, we will never know either. The evidence was so contaminated by all the incompetent hands it passed through and the primitive analysis conditions it was handled under, that no respectable or legitimate analyst would touch it now. Of course, the question arises: was this whole drama of changing the "program" a direct result of the fact that there WAS something that could be exposed, learned, or uncovered through Candy? And what about Lilly? Here we find another person who, shortly after interacting with the Cassiopaeans and me and my "learning/analysis" approach to every situation, gets their "program" changed? Just what is the story here? Getting back to Lilly's situation. We left her describing the genitalia of her rapist as somewhat resembling the red tail of a cartoon devil. We had a look at the "real thing," and saw that it was indeed rather as she described it. We also pretty well know that this information about the nature of alligator genitals would have been hard for her to obtain, but not impossible. So what happened next? Well, after working through the the rape during the hypnosis session, we went through some "processing" of the emotions. As I was doing this, I had the idea that I should "test" my hypothesis about the Greenbaum material by asking some of the "Greenbaum" questions. It was really just an idea and I certainly did NOT expect to get a positive response from my subject! Following the Greenbaum program, I set up the ideomotor finger-signals and suggested:
I nearly dropped my teeth when I got a "yes" response. Okay, that was the "red flag." I was sailing in unfamiliar waters here and really wished I hadn't started down this path without more training. But, it was like surgery: the patient was open, so I needed to see what I could find, do no damage, and hopefully, fix something before I closed her back up. After receiving the "yes" answer I said:
A voice that was quite different from Lilly's voice said: "I'm here." I asked for the name and the response was "Gatekeeper." Well, the only thing to do was to press on and identify as much as I could in the time I could do it. I definitely identifed 7 different "programs" and one of them was "Delta." Now, remember what Dr. Hammond said about "Delta?"
I went through the programs asking for the "erasure codes," and was given some of them. On some others, the very mechanical response "Access Denied!" came back. But, the freaky thing was, I was getting an almost textbook series of responses from this woman that exactly matched the information in the Greenbaum speech! I was utterly dumbfounded. I mean, what are the odds that a very short time after I became aware of this sort of thing that a person would just sort of "enter" my life who had this very situation active in her life? It just boggled the mind. I went on with my probing, and it was in this process that the most stunning information that I have ever confronted in this work came out. One
of the programs identified itself as "Master Programmer." I
began to inquire what type of program this was. "Master Programmer" was designed to turn Lilly into a dynamic New Age/Metaphysical teacher whose job was to travel the country, giving classes and seminars in many and various subjects, in order to TURN ON THE ALREADY INSTALLED PROGRAMS OF OTHER GREENBAUM TYPE VICTIMS. I asked how this could be done. The answer was simple: not only her words, but guided meditations, mantras, tones and symbols incorporated in some of the "Metaphysical jewelry" she carried to sell at her various lectures were used as program triggers. She was also using inaudible frequencies emitted by various gadgets she used in her "healing classes." Further, the teachings, even though they were ostensibly of "love and light," were designed to use certain word sequences that were standard program triggers. Not only that, but some programs were set up in such a way that even if a person were confronted with the logical inconsistency of their belief system, they would be unable to "break through" the "coded thought loop implant" to understand their own faulty logic! In other words, when a person was confronted with "truth" or obvious factual information, the program would "turn on" and deny them the ability to think anything other than the "pre-coded" thoughts that would go around and around in their head like a "message from God" or their "guides" or whoever. I asked what would happen if Lilly stopped doing this. The answer was "compliance is necessary to the mission; "not performing the task is non-compliance." I asked what would be the result of non-compliance. The answer was "termination of subject by activation of self-destruct program." Well, that was pleasant! Definitely NOT what one would think of as a "loving guide" or "angel" or "higher self!" I asked some questions about where, when and how the programming might have been installed. I wanted to see if she had the same information about "Dr. Greenbaum." It was during this portion of the session that the information was revealed that the real reason Lilly knew Sandy was because they had been in the same "programming set" as children! They had then been brought together in the healing class in Tampa because the teacher of that modality was another such as Lilly: a "Master Programmer." Well, that was a surprise! And it also made me think of Candy's depiction of her relation with Bill as children playing with a little "alien" guy who was "helping them." Just what is going on here? How many people are talking to "guides" or "angels" who are merely programs? I was probing to get the code to deactivate some of the programs and suddenly Lilly began to moan and cry "It hurts! It hurts!" and her hands went to her ears and she was trying to block out a sound that was obviously quite painful. She was twisting and turning in pain. I kept speaking to her, attempting to get one of the programs or the "core" to come forward when the most horrible voice came out of her repeating over and over "Access denied! Access denied!" I was finally able to get the "Gatekeeper" to come back and he stiffly informed me that any further attempts to probe or deactivate would result in immediate destruction of the subject. Hoo boy! That was heavy! We were playing with some nasty bullies here! At this point, Lilly had been under hypnosis for a lot longer than usual for most subjects, so I released the "Gatekeeper" with assurances that no harm would come to Lilly from me, gave her some "feel good" suggestions and ended the session. There just didn't seem to be any other option. So, we have three different cases where attempts to probe resulted in activation of "pain blocks" of such a nature that it was dangerous to continue. The first was the woman who was describing the abduction on the Pennsylvania turnpike in 1987 as described by Tom French in the St. Pete Times article, the second was Candy, and now Lilly. After the session, I didn't know WHAT to tell Lilly. She obviously didn't remember anything about the latter part of her session, but she felt a lot better and her rash was definitely calmed down by at least half, so I ventured to broach the subject of her "program." I wanted to know what, exactly, was she doing in her classes? What kinds of things were being used to "turn on" other people's programs? I had the idea that if it was brought to her conscious attention that she could begin to learn about it and further evaluate exactly what she was doing. I even had hopes that she would be able to combat the influence and "recover" from her programming. The only thing I can tell you is that as soon as I began to talk to her about it, there was a definite shift in both her personality and the fanatic look in her eyes. She began to recite all the standard "love and light" philosophy and how she was a "Lightworker" and it went on for a few minutes with my growing awareness that I was actually listening to a program! It was eerie beyond imagining to hear this "tape" running. Yes, she was saying all the "right things" to inspire confidence and warm and fuzzy feelings! Yes, she was espousing a philosphy that is more or less standard in the "New Age" theatre. But now, I was hearing it in a different way. It was no longer just the content of the words that was significant - it was something between and behind them - something sinister and lurking in wait to jump out at any moment. I was fully aware that there were other "programs" in Lilly that could, at a moment's notice, be turned on and that one of these was a killer. There was nothing to do but agree with her that she was doing a "great work for mankind" and send her home. I remembered what Dr. Hammond said about such individuals being programmed to kill their therapists. I hoped I hadn't been classified as such and "marked" for death. Seeing the fanatical fire in her eyes, there was no doubt in my mind that she could kill just as she was programmed to do. The very next day, Lilly called me and began to chat in a normal way. I asked her how she was feeling, and she said fine! She was bright and sunny in her words and manner. I was listening carefully to her to determine if I was hearing the "real Lilly." Everything seemed to be okay, and she didn't sound like she was going to come over and kill me - at least not at that moment - so I relaxed and chatted casually along, staying alert for any signs of a "switch" to an alternate personality. Nothing was out of line. I began to think that maybe we had just encountered a particularly crafty entity attached to Lilly who had used all this Greenbaum idea to avoid being sent into the light. Heck, maybe I was imagining things altogether! How could I possibly think that there was anything sinister or bizarre about Lilly?! What a great gal! So bright and easy to talk to! So engaging and funny and charming! Sheesh! This UFO business was really getting to me! I was getting paranoid! I was going off the deep end! That's it! It was ME who needed a therapist! But then, just as she was getting ready to hang up, she remarked "We need to get together soon! There are a lot of things I want to talk about since I saw you last on Saturday night." That was the night of the session with the Cassiopaeans, NOT Lilly's hypnosis the very night before.. I said "You mean something has happened since last night?" Lilly said "Last night?! What do you mean?" I reminded her of the previous night's hypnosis. Lilly laughed and told me I must be dreaming because she had gone to bed early the previous night - she had been exhausted from her classes that day! She certainly had not been with me doing a hypnosis session! One of us was missing some time here or one of us was going off the deep end and I was pretty sure it wasn't me! Not positive, just pretty sure! I assured her that we had, indeed, done a hypnosis session. I reminded her that she had called me about her dream of the reptoid rape and that she had come to my house covered with a rash and scratches. I told her to look at her abdomen to see the scratches. At that point, Lilly became quite angry and screamed that I was crazy and slammed the phone down!!! A sort of "cloud of unreality" descended over me and I really wondered for a moment if I was losing MY mind! I called Frank to and he assured me that I had, indeed, done the hypnosis session, that he had been there manning the recorder, and we had the tape and the notes. Even though I was seeing glimpses of this bizarre reality beneath the surface, my mind was really NOT wanting to accept it. Of all the many synchronistic events that had been falling fast and furious upon me, this business of receiving the Greenbaum material and then just sort of having a real "subject" of same more or less "drop into" my life was pushing the limits of credulity. Just what in the heck was going on? So, naturally, we brought the subject up at the next session.
At this point, the phone rang. It was a long distance call from a researcher in California who wanted to discuss a case and we had to continue at a later time. I was frustrated by the interruption and plagued with the questions in my mind. Did the Cassiopaeanss mean that the Greenbaum scenario was possibly a "screen" for alien programming? Was the imagery of the Reptoid Rape also a screen? Or was it completely the other way around? Were the images of alien abductions and Reptoid rapes a product of some sinister human experiment on mankind? Or even elements of both? That then led me back to the idea that the whole Satanic Ritual abuse scenario could also be either of these things: a screen over Greenbaum type programming, or a screen over alien programming. Further, many so-called "recovered memories" of sexual abuse within families could even be "screens" of programming activities by various persons or beings unknown. I was familiar already with much of the material being produced by the "psychological" community about these subjects, and I had read many "sessions" from these books and articles that were supposed to prove the existence of Satanists and their wicked agenda because this or that individual had begun to experience "flashbacks" or bits and pieces of memories of abuse. They would then hie themselves off to a psychologist, psychiatrist, or hypnotherapist who would engage them in "non-directive" therapy to assist them in the "recovery" of both their memories and, by default, the "missing parts" of their "soul." I would read these accounts and see the clues scattered throughout that the "emerging" scenarios were, very likely, "created." And that is not to say that the individual was creating them at all! They were more likely "manufactured" just as the scene of the "benevolent mantids" who were "teaching the children in a loving way" in the session at the beginning of this series was manufactured. When the screen was directively "removed," the revealed activity of Mantids eating human children was exposed. It was clear that in "non-directive" therapy, this would never have occurred. The problem was that, in the field of hypnotherapy, there had been such an outcry from skeptics in past years about the "suggestibility" of the client, and the purported "agendas" of the therapists, that "directed therapy" had fallen into disfavor. It was now all "client directed." The therapist was more a "sounding board" who merely gave gentle, non-directive suggestions that the client should give him/ herself "permission" to "recover" the memory (whatever it was). In this way, it was believed that the client would "recover their truth." In this sense, "their truth" amounted to little more than another illusion. The problem with this approach is twofold. In the first place, if we consider for even a moment that there is the possibility that there are beings - whether human or otherwise - who are out there engaged in mind programming efforts, (and there is some considerable factual evidence to support this), then we have to consider that they would "install" blocks to recovery of the memories of their activities as a first line of defense. They would very likely make these blocks or "screens" interactive with some installed mechanism of severe discomfort so that the subject would either avoid retrieval, or be unable to retrieve such memories without serious pain or stress. The second problem is that I have experimented with "suggestibility" of subjects to some considerable extent and have found that they are not as malleable as skeptics might wish us to think. Which leads, of course, to the idea of manipulation of "opinion" regarding "directive therapy" so that it "falls into disrepute" as a therapeutic mode, thus adding a layer of protection over such nefarious activities. There was an experiment done some years ago by a researcher who selected a random sample of individuals who were, ostensibly, NOT abductees and, under hypnosis, or guided imagery techniques, led them into an "alien abduction" scenario. Because a significant number of them began to describe abductions in the same terms as persons who had claimed to be abductees due to some conscious representations surfacing, it was decided that this proved that the abduction complex of images was more or less "archetypal" and therefore, false. It never occurred to the researchers that the "non-abducted" persons who described accurately the abduction process might really have been abducted, but that their abductions and programming did not have the "glitches" that cause others to "remember" or to have "clues" that lead them to active therapy to recover their memories. Anyway, this experiment was taken as "proof" that the recoverd memories of abductees could very well be "suggested" to them by both literature, movies, and even the therapists. So, "directive therapy" was tossed aside in favor of just allowing the client to let his memories - whatever they might be - sort of "drift to the top." I can demonstrate hundreds of instances where this idea of "suggestibility" is false. An example would be when I say to a client under hypnosis who is describing an "alien being," that I want them to tell me what kind of nose they have; is it big or little. Now, right there I have suggested that the being MUST have a nose and that it is either big or little. If the client were as suggestible as is proposed, they would naturally tell me one or the other or even that it is a "medium sized nose." But time and again, the answer would come back: "I don't see a nose. There is a little hole or a dimple-like thing, but no nose." Or, I would say "what are you smelling?" That is a direct suggestion that they must be smelling something. But the answer might come back "Nothing at all." Or, if a smell IS present, they might have their attention directed to that factor and tell me that there is some sort of smell. Another example would be when I ask the client: "How did you get out of the room? Did you go out the door or the window?" And they would respond "Neither. I sort of 'went through the wall.'" On the other hand, if I suggest that the were "carried on a beam of light" as was the case in a different instance they had previously described, they might come back and say "not this time. I was carried through the door." Over and over again I have tried these little "directive" suggestions to get data, and over and over again I have seen that, even with powerful direction, the client will "recover" whatever is there to recover with very little fabrication, if any. And that is where we have to begin to deal with the "screening" process. If there is a screen, that is what the victim will perceive as the actual memory. And it is in probing the "screen" that other clues must be noted and followed in order to arrive at what is beneath the screen IF POSSIBLE! For example, in one of my early abduction cases, the client had a vivid dream that she was sure was MORE than a dream. She dreamed about our friendly "Mantid beings," as described by a different subject earlier in this series. The subject described in the earlier section here on the site was actually a much later case chronologically, and this earlier case that I am now mentioning was the one that had given me the clue that there was something deeper in the situation than was being presented. This first "Mantid" case was also a description of the beings as kind and loving and friendly - just full of great wisdom and kindness. The subject went through a whole description of how grand and glorious it was to be in their company and care, and after all these glowing praises of the wonderful, consciousness raising experience, I brought the session to an end thinking that it was exactly as presented. However, the instant the client was awakened, she leaped up from the couch and ran to the bathroom where we could hear her vomiting violently for some minutes. When she returned, she said that her stomach was very upset (obviously!) and that she must have "eaten something" that didn't agree with her earlier. But that episode bothered me. It kept coming up in my mind as a clue that ought to be followed. The next time this particular client scheduled a session, I was determined to get to the bottom of this matter, so I utilized the somatic technique where I asked her "body consciousness" to speak to me and tell me why, at the last session, she had become ill after recovering the memory of the "abduction." The somatic technique is, again, the ideomotor signals of the fingers where the index finger rises to indicate a "yes" answer and the little finger rises to indicate a "no" answer. I asked the body consciousness if the description of the abduction that had been given in the previous session had been what actually happened, and the answer came back "no." I asked if the beings who had been presented as kind and benevolent had, in fact, acted kindly and benevolently toward the subject. Again, the answer was "no." I then asked if they had done harmful and painful things to the subject. The answer was "yes." Next, I asked if the memory of the abduction as presented in the earlier session was a "screen" that had been created and implanted into the the subconscious mind, and the answer was "yes." So, we had a problem here. The subconscious is not as sacrosanct as we would like to think. The "emerging memories" that we would all like to think are the "individual truth" of the client could not only be manipulated, they could be entirely false. How to break through them? I came up with a little technique that I experimented with and it seemed to work quite effectively - as far as I could tell - and this was partly demonstrated in the session earlier in this series. I call it the "screen splitter." In order to make it work properly, the client has to be situated in a "safe environment" while under hypnosis, which means that the events to be reviewed must be placed at a "remove" and the client must have some directed means of accessing via the ideomotor construct that goes beyond just finger signals. This constuct becomes a sort of "internal television" which translates the body information into "television signals" which are then projected onto a screen which the subject controls with a hand held "remote." A further consideration that must be clear in this type of therapy, is that the hypnotherapist MUST take a more or less dominant role as not only guide, but as a warrior-companion. The therapist must "go in" with the individual and watch for the lurking dangers and defend the client from them so that they can safely make the journey to the truth and back again. It becomes more of a shamanic type of activity than anything else. I was later surprised to learn that what I had developed was pretty close to the techniques of the ancient Siberian shamans who would "journey into the underworld," and do battle with the forces present there that were controlling, obfuscating, and/or using the client for their own purposes via tricks and deception. Mircea Eliade writes in Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy:
These archaic conceptions of the cause of disease and disorder are startlingly reminiscent of the way the Cassiopaeans have described the "abduction process."
Even though the Cassiopaeans are saying that we cannot "remove" the 4th density implants, they have said that we can "deactivate" them by being aware of them and refusing to respond to their machinations. Nevertheless, over and over again we find this concept expressed in the most archaic shamanic practices: "healing by extraction of the magical object that has brought on the sickness and the search for the soul abducted by evil spirits." Or "[they] attribute sickness to an object introduced into the body by a god or a spirit, or to possession. And treatment consists in extracting the magical object or expelling the spirit. Eliade writes:
I was still somewhat concerned about Lilly's revelations about Sandy and the remark under hypnosis that she and Sandy had been part of the same "programming set," which I took to be a "group." Not only that, but there was the receipt of the Elaine and the Sisters of Light material at precisely the time that Lilly made her revelations to me about Sandy. Was I looking at another aspect of the "hidden contol mechanism?" The whole thing was so unlikely and so crazy that I was really stretching my credulity to even deal with it on a rational basis. But heck! When you talk to "6th density light beings" via a board on Saturday nights, how unlikely and weird can anything be? It was a few weeks before we had another session because we were busy helping Sandy straighten out a big mess in her life involving her mother in a nursing home. It was taking a huge amount of my time and energy and I really felt that Sandy ought to be able to manage these things herself like anybody else, but she was so pitiful and seemingly grateful for every minute of my time that I felt guilty for resenting the many demands placed on me. But, after a time, I started to get the idea that something was not quite right with this scenario. Every interaction with Sandy and her mother resulted in a serious draining of energy. Every interaction with Sandy in the group resulted in an argument or misunderstanding. On several occasions, these disagreements almost led to the giving up of the project altogether! Of course, my mind was working overtime to explain things in a rational way. I did not want to fall into the trap of "believing and thereby making real" in terms of the Greenbaum and Elaine material, and maybe if I hadn't been doing that, I would have noticed things sooner! I sat down with Sandy one day to talk and worked around to the subject of her current associations. I wasn't going to directly ask her if she was involved with a sort of "coven" up in Hernando County as Lilly had reported, but I was going to try to find out where it was she went several nights a week that she never talked about. The long and short of it was that she admitted that she had been going up to Trudy and George's house two nights a week to do "therapy" with both of them. She very innocently wondered why it would even be a problem, since they were simply "bodywork clients" and she needed to make money in her profession. I was absolutely devastated. Sandy KNEW what those people had done to me, she had denied any contact or association with them for a long time, and now she was telling me that she was hanging out with them two nights a week?! And then, after working on them (ostensibly) she was coming to do body work on me, bringing that energy directly into my house, and possibly into my very physical structure?! Clearly she was NOT getting it in regards to the "hidden nature" of things going on here on the Big Blue Marble. But, I stayed calm and said nothing to her. I realized, at this point, that it was entirely possible for her to be doing things in an "alternate personality" of which the Sandy I knew was totally unaware. But Frank and I decided to have a private session to address this issue. The result was quite interesting.
At a later session, Terry, who had just read the Greenbaum Speech brought the subject up again:
That was NOT a pleasant thought. But then, it is because of the fact that the programming has "glitches" and is not fool-proof that we know about it at all. Apparently it IS possible to escape the controls, though whether one has the capacity to really get to the bottom of it and see it for what it truly is remains to be seen. A lot more work needs to be done in this area. A few days later I received a phone call from Lilly, inquiring how I was doing and I was surprised at the normal, chatty tone of her voice considering the circumstances of the last conversation we had together when she began screaming at me and slammed the phone down. But, by this time, I was accustomed to the idea that some people might have all kinds of "personalities" that can be turned on or off, and perhaps it would only be through constant exposure to the information about these things that could assist in their awakening. I mentioned that I had some material for her to read, and she came by and I gave her a printed copy of the Greenbaum speech. After reading it, she called again and was VERY anxious to attend another session. Tim, from the old Reiki group had also contacted me and was present. The session began with some questions about our ability to do research in a free and independent way considering the limitations that we were becoming aware of in the world around us. The Cassiopaeans gave a very significant clue to the process of awakening in their reply:
The next question was for Lilly who had experienced a strange event during a Reiki class earlier that day.
So there was another clue about the kinds of things that can activate "programs." Different "initiations" offered by Metaphysical/New Age teachers and seminar leaders! Gads! It was beginning to sound very dangerous to become involved with such groups at all! At this point, Lilly began to talk about an amazing "column of light" that she had photographed in her house. I was aware of the fact that this might relate to the "entry point" of the Reptoids who had raped her, but I didn't want to "rock the boat" of her personality alter that was present at the time, so I said nothing. I was hoping that this "present" part of her would seek the information that could be helpful to enable her to overcome her programming. She identified the column of light as a "portal" and was sure that it indicated her connection to her "guides."
At this point, we began to discuss the various illusions that we are presented with that we have to learn about before we can penetrate and overcome them. At this point, the Cassiopaeans just tossed out a term that brought us back to the Greenbaum subject:
Naturally, with the response to Tim's question being so forthcoming, everybody wanted to know if THEY had become involved with their respective partners as a result of some type of programming.
[Phone call interrupted end of transmission, call was from Tim's wife demanding that he leave immediately and come home!] |
