The Cassiopaean Experiment

The Cassiopaean Experiment

Introduction:

Open Your I and Seek

Signs of The Times

Site Map

SOTT Daily News and Commentary

Books

Cassiopaea

Introduction The Cassiopaean Experiment in Superluminal Communication (9 files)

The Exorcist in Love by Thomas French, St. Petersburd Times

Cassiopaea FAQ

Discover the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!

Political Ponerology - The Study of evil adjusted for political purposes

9/11: The Ultimate Truth

The Truth about Hyperdimensional Beings and Alien Abductions

New expanded Wave Series now in print!

Support The Quantum Future School and The Signs Team

How you can help keep Signs of The Times online...

The material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!

The issue of "channeling" as a scientific experiment - utilizing information obtained by such a method - is problematical, to say the least. Again, we wish to reiterate that the "Cassiopaean Source" is NOT, and never has been, a dialogue with so-called "aliens" or "discarnate" beings as they are generally understood.

Again we mention the fact that nowadays, there are many individuals who approach very close to the border of pathology, promoting ideas, beliefs, and a great deal of nonsense, that is quite rightly labeled as "cultic." We wish to also emphasize the fact that what society holds to be "accepted" religions - Judaism, Christianity, Islam - also must be rightly categorized as cults when scientific protocols are brought to bear upon them and the information that purports to proceed therefrom. As Thomas French wrote in his article about Laura:

Millions of Americans go to church every Sunday and contemplate a story about a man who was born 2,000 years ago, the son of a divine father and a human mother. This man, according to the story, grew up to raise the dead and perform other miracles until, at age 33, he was tortured and killed and then rose from the tomb to rejoin his father in heaven. Ever since then, one of the most sacred rituals of this story's adherents is to symbolically drink the blood and consume the body of this son of God.

I intend no disrespect to those who have faith in this particular story. I grew up inside that faith myself; during the catechism classes of my Catholic childhood, I was taught that Communion is not symbolic at all, that every Sunday at Mass we truly do eat the body of Christ.

By any measure, that is a wild story.

It is not only a wild story, it is a dangerous one. As Laura has written:

I remember how shocked I was to learn that about 60 million people died in WW II, but all I had ever heard about was the 6 million Jews. It was even more shocking to realize that Stalin had done away with - by various means - millions and millions of his own people. But nobody had said much about that at all. This was very much exercising me when I wrote "The Secret History of The World."

The Laws of Probability tell us that, without any intelligent input, 50% of the time the events in our world would lead to great good and benefit for mankind. In a strictly mechanical way, life in our world ought to have manifested a sort of "equilibrium." Factoring in intelligent decisions to do good would bring this average up to about 70%. That would mean that humanity would have advanced over the millennia to a state of existence where good and positive things happen in our lives more often than "negative" or "bad" things. In this way, many of the problems of humanity would have been effectively solved. War and conflict would be a rarity, at least 70 percent of the earth's population would have decent medical care, a comfortable roof over their heads, and sufficient nutritious food so that death by disease or starvation would be almost unheard of.

The facts are, however, quite different.

More than 840,000,000 people on the Earth suffer from hunger. That's about three times the population of the entire USA. This is chronic, persistent hunger, which kills 24,000 people every day, or over 8 million each year. Three of four who die from starvation are younger than five years old.

According to the Historical Atlas of the Twentieth Century, during the past 100 years there have been approximately 2 billion deaths (including civilians) resulting from war , tyrannical governments, and man-made famine. When these figures are broken down into deaths caused by Communism vs. Capitalism, they are almost equal, with the figures slightly higher for Capitalism which may surprise some people who believe that the Capitalistic system is the "right" one.

"By their fruits you shall know them."

Turning to mortality statistics that are NOT related to war and famine, we find that it is a bit difficult to get an actual number because the stats are nearly always expressed in terms of percentages rather than in hard population numbers. One gets the feeling that the actual count is so frightening that this approach is used for the express purpose of avoiding having to face the facts. One thing we do know is that deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke are the leading cause of death in 31 of the 35 Western Hemisphere countries that report disease related mortality statistics. The highest of these mortality rates are found in the English-speaking Caribbean, USA, Canada, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. Mortality rates from these causes are increasing in the Central American and Latin Caribbean regions as they come more and more under the sway of Western capitalism.

What we are talking about above are the "quiet" statistics, from our present reality.

Even now it is easy to forget that there were 65 Million deaths from WW II alone and that deaths from disease and starvation continue as a quiet, steady, drum beat of increasing mortality behind the trumpeting of school shootings, sensational murder trials, and little Cuban boys who become the center of international custody disputes.

I don’t think that one single person on this planet will disagree that they want a better life for themselves and their children; and most of them will add that they do not presently have the capacity to make it a reality. Except for a very small minority of very sick people, I don’t think anybody likes to see misery and suffering, disease and death and despair, in any context. And again we must ask: if these things are so detestable to human beings at large, if so many people are working and thinking and praying to improve the conditions of our world, why isn’t it happening?

Seekers of "Ascension" - a large number of whom could be considered "Intelligentsia" - are always aware of these things, and they are asking "What is the origin of all the misery and suffering? Does it just happen? Do people and only people cause others to suffer? Is it that God is good, but allows bad things to happen?"

"Don't forget the power of prayer," we are told by our religious leaders, or "positive thinking," as we are told by the New Age gurus.

The only problem is, prayers and positive thinking do not seem to have improved the world very much on the occasions when it is certain that nearly every human being was praying for a certain outcome.

Jesus promised: "If any two of you shall agree and ask... it shall be done." (Matt 18:19) That's a promise. What do you want or need? Just ask!

But it doesn't work and we see it!

Over sixty million people died because God didn't do what everybody thought he should do. C.S. Lewis struggled with this issue in the latter part of his life. He saw clearly that, before World War II, practically every human being on the planet was praying—to Jesus, God the Father, the Virgin Mary, Allah, Buddha and whoever else you can name or mention, so all the bases were covered—that this terrible thing would not happen. The memory of the previous “Great War” was still fresh in the mind of mankind. They remembered the horrible carnage and vowed, never again!

In the end, after the most mighty cry of prayer in human memory, rising from the earth, almost one-third of the world was uninhabitable and sixty-five million human beings were dead.

That was God’s answer to prayer.

That was the result of the "power of positive thinking."

THINK ABOUT IT.

Throughout history we find one group praying to their god to protect them from the depredations of another group. The other group is praying just as fervently that their depredations will be successful. When one group succeeds in killing another, is that proof that its god is supreme?

What then happens if the members of the successful group are then reincarnated into the group that was defeated? (We are assuming some form of reicarnation to be highly probable based on research.)

This is not a rhetorical question since a very interesting book by Rabbi Yonassan Gershom, Beyond the Ashes, [1992, A.R.E. Press, Virginia Beach] was written about the great numbers of Jews who died in the holocaust now being reincarnated as Christians. There has also been some suggestion that many Nazis are now being reincarnated as Jews in the present time which would go a long way toward explaining the Fascist flavor of "Zionism."

What then, does such an idea do to the concept of “my god is the only right one?”

I can assure the reader from my own experience as a hypnotherapist, that every single case I have worked with in terms of “past life therapy,” has demonstrated a “string” of "past lives" in such variety of nationality and religious orientation, that it literally makes a joke of anyone stating with absolute certainty, that their beliefs or religious orientation now, are the only right ones.

It is quite plausible, assuming the reincarnation is "real", that those who declaim against another group most vehemently, will most certainly find themselves a member of that very group in the next “round” of incarnation.

I get really irritated with people who are "holocaust deniers," when they try to say that 6 million Jews were not systematically murdered by the Nazi war machine. But I get equally irritated by those who forget about the deaths of the other 59 million people.

In point of fact, one could say that, because of the Jews, many more millions of "Christians" or peoples of other religions have been killed than for any other single reason.

Because of the Jewish religion - monotheism - Christianity was "born" as the "new covenant" with the putative Jewish God.

Because of this Jewish God, claimed by Christianity, endless wars were fought in Europe, the Crusades took place, followed by the Inquisition. And then, of course, there are the endless deaths of entire cultures, due to the claims of the Christians and their "missionary" efforts.

So, in the end you could say that Yahweh/Jehovah has been the root cause of nearly all of the sufferings and deaths of humanity in the past four millennia.

Not a very good track record, and certainly, something to think about when pondering: "By their fruits, you shall know them."

[Note: we do not forget that cruelty and brutal killings of civilians has occurred in other cultures as well, though not on the same scale. And so, according to some sources, in December 1937, in a single attack, known as "The rape of Nanjing", Japaneese soldiers killed nearly 200,000 civilians. These soldiers considered themselves to be heros, serving their "One God" - the Emperor.]

Human beings as a whole ought to reject this horrible God in ALL his forms and variations from his beginnings as the god of the Jews right down to his putative appearance to Mohammed. A more evil being has never - I think - appeared on the stage of history.

And so, the question is: why should anyone consider ANYTHING that is "channeled" as worthy of attention, much less a useful contribution to scientific research into the underlying nature of our reality?

If the claim is made that ALL channeling is "cultic" or "crap," what is the answer to that?

Ark comments:

I can't take such statements seriously.

Why?

I am a scientist. I look at things in a somewhat different way than other people. I am more critical. I am even more critical than most of my colleagues. So, when I see a statement like this "Any channeled information is crap. It is 100% disinformation" or "All channeling is disinformation" and "channeling is a satellite transmission," I get very suspicious.

Why so?

I immediately see that this is plain nonsense - in THESE sentences. And when I see someone speaking nonsense in a couple of sentences, and when this somebody is so affirmative - THEN I can't take this person seriously in all the rest.

What are the facts? What are the possibilities?

Alright, there is a possibility that some (most?) of the channeling TODAY comes via satellites or other means of programming. That IS possible. (See the Quantum Future School Timeline)

The next question is : WHY?

The evident answer is: to twist, to disinform, via New Age-type naive people.

Can the Cassiopaean communications come the same way?

It is not so easy. We are not naive. We are critical. We think, we analyze. We test and research.

Could SOME of our "communications" have been influenced this way?

YES. There is such a possibility.

Can ALL, or even 95% be received this way?

NO. Because there are too many instances in which the Cassiopaeans were "answering" questions to which normal "satellite type" of intelligence, without being able to instantly read the minds of everyone on this planet, could not have had access.

Therefore, I think, the statement that ALL channeling is crap and disinformation, and that 95% is via satellites shows that

a) Anyone who says this is either consciously disinforming or not able to think logically,
b) Anyone who says this is not interested in discovering the truth.

And this is the main difference between our approach and the approach of the many groups that rightly deserve the label "cult."

While we are ready to question everything, and ALWAYS look for new facts, other individuals declare "WE KNOW THE TRUTH". Here it is! And then we find one or another easily detectable nonsense statement that is claimed to be absolute, and this discredits everything else they say. [Laura's note: this is doubly true for the "standard religions."]

My Mother was "talking to spirits" using a porcelain dish. Spirits were "talking" to her. She was scared. She was not in the "new age", she was a little old lady. There was no point for satellites to waste their energy and computing power to talk to my Mother - or many others like her in the times before satellites existed.

You see what I mean? There are REAL phenomena that deserve investigation. And the devil, as always, is in the details.

Whenever someone claims: "All white is black" - I get suspicious. And I am turned off to everything else they say. Not because "white being black" is impossible, we know there ARE paradoxes, but BECAUSE the person uses this three letter word: "all".

As for satellites trying, once in a while, their dirty tricks - yes this is possible. And we ARE taking it into account. But ALWAYS we are trying to apply our best logical thinking, our best "judgment". And although logic and judgment as a reality check is NEVER SUFFICIENT when dealing with possible "higher forces," yet it is ALWAYS NECESSARY. Which means, in practical terms:

1) ALWAYS USE IT TO THE MAX.
2) NEVER THINK THAT YOU CAN RELY COMPLETELY ON IT ALONE!

What I want to state clearly is: this "communication", the Cassiopaean Experiment, IS different than other so called "channeling".

It was different from the very beginning, it continues to be so, and it will continue to be different. We may give it a name: Critical Superluminal Communication. It is such by intent, not by a chance.

The Cassiopaean Experiment is a form of communication in which, by an intent, the messenger is as important as the message itself. They are inseparably entangled in a quantum way; an interfering quantum amplitude. They form a oneness, a whole. To separate the message from the messenger would be, in this Cassiopaean quantum experiment, like closing one hole in a double slit experiment. You close one hole, and the whole pattern is different, not just a part of it.

What is this "Critical Superluminal Communication?" In what way is it different than other channeling?

It would take a lot of space and time to describe it in details. One day we will do it. But for now, let me just make this observation: the Cassiopaean Critical Superluminal Communication has characteristics of a scientific experiment.

Think of us as we actually are: scientists in their lab, working on the great laws of the universe. They perform an important series of experiments. They are trained professionals, they know their stuff, they know their laboratory equipment and its quirks. But they are human beings. Once in a while someone will make some silly joke, once in a while they will have to discard a series of data, because mice have messed up their equipment during the night.

Now, think, what advantage it would be if they would write in their paper the silly joke, include the mice data, the ink blobs etc. etc?

That is not the way of science. And the Cassiopaean experiment will proceed as a scientific one. With scientific standards and a continuous critical attitude in mind.

The Cassiopaean Critical Superluminal Communication is indeed an experiment. It is in this respect that it is DIFFERENT from other communication. And it will stay so.

The difference is in the approach.

We are searching for the truth. Many others - including purveyors of "tradition" - are sure that they know "the truth" and they would like to impose it on other people, or manipulate other people, into believing what they say with no critical thinking or research or experimentation at all.

Traditional religions generally proclaim that their truth comes from "God," or aliens or something "out there." But when someone else dares to have a different way of finding the truth - it is necessarily "100% disinformation" and "crap" or a "cult."

We try to share our thoughts, and when necessary, we are ready to learn and CHANGE. And that is what is most important: this attitude of being open.

What if the "traditional religions" or claims that experiments in channeling are disinformation are right? Even if I consider it as highly improbable, what if it is correct? Can it be true?

Of course, being a scientist, and using my brain in order to judge, I had to consider also this possibility, however improbable it may it look to me. And I concluded that it cannot be right.

Here is my reasoning: it goes via "reductio ad absurdum" - which is often used in logic and in mathematical proofs. You assume something to be true, and then by a chain of logical deductions you come to the conclusion that your assumption cannot be true. Somewhat tricky - but useful.

Let's apply this method to the claim that "all channeling is 100% disinformation because it is coming via satellite". Let us suppose it is true. In order to be true it must include the capability of reading and controlling EVERYBODY'S mind at ALL times.

But if that is the case, then why would anyone be exempt from this control?

Therefore, by logic, anyone making such a claim is also being influenced by programming and by satellites (if everybody is, then so is the one making the claim). If so, then what such a person says is skewed. And, because he is so loud, and so sure, about this subject, for no valid reason, it is a logical conclusion that what he is telling is NOT true, that it is disinformation.

So we see that starting from the assumption that anyone making such a claim is right (satellites affect everybody) we come to the conclusion that what such a claim is wrong (because the claimant is simply repeating the satellite disinformation).

So, here we have reductio ad absurdum.

But we can go even further. Can we see a reason why anyone would say such evident nonsense? Why?

Well, here we can have a hypothesis too.

If, as we know by the above analysis, NOT ALL channeling is from satellites, that SOME channeling can provide us with real information from "benevolent higher beings", from "us in the future", from a "Divine Inspiration", or from "Mind-God and Oversoul", call it as you will, then it is only natural that there will be forces trying to discredit Critical, Scientific Experiments in such communications.

So, we have solved one problem here. Those individuals who claim that ALL channeling is disinformation or symptomatic of a "cultic agenda," then we have reason to suppose that any promoter of such a view is obviously an agent of those very forces.

There is one more exercise in logical reasoning and critical thinking that comes to mind.

Most people are not really clear about what channeling is, so let me take as a particular example using the Ouija board, as described on our pages.

Why do we use Ouija board?

The reason is quite simple: we use an instrument to screen out the external disturbance, the "noise." In particular, the use of a board type instrument makes it more difficult for satellites, or other programming signals coming from human and hybrid technology, when and if they come, to affect the message.

When using a board, at least two persons are needed for operation. There are no rituals, no beliefs. As is the case with proper scientific protocols, there is full awareness, the utilization of critical thinking, sometimes jokes, often coffee, fresh minds, loud discussion, and the board - questions and answers, followed by research and analysis.

Thinking in terms of possible quantum physics involved in mind-matter interactions, it is clear to me that the methods we use are more likely to be robust and shielded against deliberate bombarding from outside by mind controlling signals. On the other hand, talking directly to "Mind-God" as some claim to do, is more susceptible to interference.

For example, a weak outside EM signal can be talking directly to a tiny implant in our teeth, and we will take it for our "Oversoul"....

Or, as Laura has pointed out: When Yahweh spoke through his channels, the activity was "divine inspiration." When anybody else "channeled," it was necromancy or demonic possession, or even just out and out deception. This was because Jehovah/Yahweh claimed to be the only god and that this was true simply because Jehovah/Yahweh said so via channeling - which, by Jahovah/Yahweh's definition was necromancy, demonic possession, or deception!

Again, applying our ruductio ad absurdum to standard religions, we might think that the monotheistic cults prevalent over the planet today may have been "created" for the express purpose of "demonizing" scientific, Critical channeling.

So, by logical thinking and by critical analysis we came to a working hypothesis.

But, please, do not jump to the conclusion that we solved all problems. Important problems are still out there and need to be addressed. The above analysis does not tell us at all WHICH channeling (if any at all) is legitimate. It gives indications. To answer this question a full analysis, that takes into account not one but many aspects, is necessary. Completely different methods must be used. If A is an opponent of B, and if we find that A is wrong, that does not mean that B is right! To see whether B is right or not - is a different problem.

Let me just note that we were discussing many times C's channeling, on these pages and with other groups, and even our "attackers" have admitted openly that the C's have an amazing record.

Most important of all is to remember that we are not talking to "God" or "Spirits" or "Aliens" or any such nonsense. As Laura theorized from the beginning, the communication may very well be a link to hyperdimensional realities, a realm of symbols and images and dynamics and no mystical "mumbo-jumbo" will be tolerated or promoted by us. Not ever.

Continue

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here that is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication is offered with the caveat that the reader ought always to research on their own. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Cassiopaean materials Copyright © 1994-2004 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: Could Not Write to File _cass_intro04_htm].