A Few Words About
widely-used method for determining the age of fossils is to date them
by the "known age" of the rock strata in which they are found. At the
same time, the most widely-used method for determining the age of the
rock strata is to date them by the "known age" of the fossils they contain.
In this "circular dating" method, all ages are based on uniformitarian
assumptions about the date and order in which fossilized plants and
animals are believed to have evolved. Most people are surprised to learn
that there is, in fact, no way to directly determine the age of any
fossil or rock. The so called "absolute" methods of dating (radiometric
methods) actually only measure the present ratios of radioactive isotopes
and their decay products in suitable specimens - not their age. These
measured ratios are then extrapolated to an "age" determination.
with all radiometric "clocks" is that their accuracy critically depends
on several starting assumptions which are largely unknowable. To date
a specimen by radiometric means, one must first know the starting amount
of the parent isotope at the beginning of the specimen's existence.
Second, one must be certain that there were no daughter isotopes in
the beginning. Third, one must be certain that neither parent nor daughter
isotopes have ever been added or removed from the specimen. And fourth,
one must be certain that the decay rate of parent isotope to daughter
isotope has always been the same. That one or more of these assumptions
are often invalid is obvious from the published radiometric "dates"
(to say nothing of "rejected" dates) found in the literature.
the most obvious problems is that several samples from the same location
often give widely-divergent ages. Apollo moon samples, for example,
were dated by both uranium-thorium-lead and potassium-argon methods,
giving results which varied from 2 million to 28 billion years. Lava
flows from volcanoes on the north rim of the Grand Canyon (which erupted
after its formation) show potassium-argon dates a billion years "older"
than the most ancient basement rocks at the bottom of the canyon. Lava
from underwater volcanoes near Hawaii (that are known to have erupted
in 1801 AD) have been "dated" by the potassium-argon method with results
varying from 160 million to nearly 3 billion years. It's really no wonder
that all of the laboratories that "date" rocks insist on knowing in
advance the "evolutionary age" of the strata from which the samples
were taken -- this way, they know which dates to accept as "reasonable"
and which to ignore.
precisely, it is based on the assumption that nothing "really exceptional"
happened in the meantime. What I mean by "really exceptional" is this:
an event theoretically possible, but whose mechanism is not yet understood
in terms of the established paradigms. To give an example: a crossing
of two different universes. This is theoretically possible, taking into
account modern physical theories, but it is too speculative to discuss
its "probability" and possible consequences.
such an event change radioactive decay data? Could it change the values
of some fundamental physical constants? Yes it could.
possible that similar events have happened in the past? Yes, it is possible.
How possible it is? We do not know. We do not know, in fact, what would
be an exact meaning of 'crossing of two different universes.'
to considering the idea of cataclysms that could have destroyed ancient
civilizations more than once, there is another matter to consider in
special relationship to radioactive decay: that ancient civilizations
may have destroyed themselves with nuclear war.
dates for Pleistocene remains in northeastern North America, according
to scientists Richard Firestone of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
and William Topping, are younger?as much as 10,000 years younger?than
for those in the western part of the country. Dating by other methods
like thermoluminescence (TL), geoarchaeology, and sedimentation suggests
that many radiocarbon dates are grossly in error. For example, materials
from the Gainey Paleoindian site in Michigan, radiocarbon dated at 2880
yr BC, are given an age by TL dating of 12,400 BC. It seems that there
are so many anomalies reported in the upper US and in Canada of this
type, that they cannot be explained by ancient aberrations in the atmosphere
or other radiocarbon reservoirs, nor by contamination of data samples
(a common source of error in radiocarbon dating). Assuming correct methods
of radiocarbon dating are used, organic remains associated with an artifact
will give a radiocarbon age younger than they actually are only if they
contain an artificially high radiocarbon keel.
research indicates that the entire Great Lakes region (and beyond) was
subjected to particle bombardment and a catastrophic nuclear irradiation
that produced secondary thermal neutrons from cosmic ray interactions.
The neutrons produced unusually large quantities of Pu239 and substantially
altered the natural uranium abundance rations in artifacts and in other
exposed materials including cherts , sediments, and the entire landscape.
These neutrons necessarily transmuted residual nitrogen in the dated
charcoals to radiocarbon, thus explaining anomalous dates. […]
C14 level in the fossil record would reset to a higher value. The excess
global radiocarbon would then decay with a half-life of 5730 years,
which should be seen in the radiocarbon analysis of varied systems.[…]
increases in C14 are apparent in the marine data at 4,000, 32,000-34,000,
and 12,500 BC. These increases are coincident with geomagnetic excursions.
enormous energy released by the catastrophe at 12,500 BC could have
heated the atmosphere to over 1000 C over Michigan, and the neutron
flux at more northern locations would have melted considerable glacial
ice. Radiation effects on plants and animals exposed to the cosmic rays
would have been lethal, comparable to being irradiated in a 5 megawatt
reactor more than 100 seconds.
overall pattern of the catastrophe matches the pattern of mass extinction
before Holocene times. The Western Hemisphere was more affected than
the Eastern, North America more than South America, and eastern North
America more than western North America. Extinction in the Great lakes
area was more rapid and pronounced than elsewhere. Larger animals were
more affected than smaller ones, a pattern that conforms to the expectation
that radiation exposure affects large bodies more than smaller ones.
[Firestone, Richard B., Topping, William, Terrestrial Evidence of a
Nuclear Catastrophe in Paleoindian Times, dissertation research, 1990
evidence that Firestone and Topping discovered is puzzling for a lot
of reasons. But, the fact is, there are reports of similar evidence
from such widely spread regions as India, Ireland, Scotland, France,
and Turkey; ancient cities whose brick and stone walls have literally
been vitrified, that is, fused together like glass.
which relate to "Earth Changes" are scattered throughout the more than
1,000 pages of text that have been delivered to date... Here is a selection
of some of the most pertinent to the CAUSES and RESULTS ... and, it
is mostly through questions regarding the past and cycles of history
that we were given insight as to our future.
the earliest questions we asked was regarding the fate of the dinosaurs.
(L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
Q: (L) Did a comet actually strike the earth?
Q: (L) Was it a large comet?
Q: (L) How large?
A: The largest was 18 miles diameter, but no one was large enough for
event. 14 hit at that occasion.
Q: (L) Is there any regular periodicity or cycle to this comet business?
Q: (L) What is the period?
A: 3600 years roughly.
Q: (L) Where are these cometary showers from?
A: Clusters in their own orbit.
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets orbit around the sun?
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) Is this cluster of comets the remains of a planet?
Q: (L) What body were the Sumerians talking about when they described
the Planet of the crossing or Nibiru?
Q: (L) This body of comets you have talked about?
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets appear to be a single body as Sitchen
Q: (L) Now, this cluster of comets, when was the last time it came into
the solar system?
A: 3582 yrs ago.
Q: (L) So, when is this cluster expected to hit the plane of the ecliptic
A: 12 to 18 years. [This session was in 1994]
Q: (L) How long has this comet cluster been part of our solar system?
A: 890 million years.
Q: (L) What was the origin of this comet cluster? Was it originally a
A: No. Your government already knows they're coming close again.
Q: (L) You said that the orbit is around the Sun. Where does it enter
the plane of the ecliptic?
Q: (L) Does it enter between Mars and Jupiter, for example?
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic? Or is
it at an angle?
A: Not correct idea structure. Picture a spirograph.
Q: (L) Do the comets orbit around themselves. Do they have a sort of axis?
Q: (L) How many are in this cluster?
Q: (L) Do they lose or pick any up from time to time?
Q: (L) How big is the biggest one at this time?
A: 900 miles diameter. Spirograph.
Q: (L) According to my calculations, the comet cluster came by 8,788 B.C.,
is that correct?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) Was there any historical cataclysm recorded in history that we
could relate to that passing?
Q: (L) And this was part of the great flood that occurred 12,388 B.C.,
is that correct?
Q: (L) Now, you have said that Venus was drawn into the solar system by
the gravitational pull of the cluster of comets?
Q: (L) Where did Venus get all its gases and clouds and so forth? What
was its origin? Where did it get all this stuff?
A: Collected during fiery, friction filled journey and space matter in
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
Q: (L) Now, I have compared certain passages of Revelations to the work
of Immanuel Velikovsky, were those sections accurate in what they describe?
Q: (L) Is there going to be massive disruption on the planet and maybe
a lot of people transitioning out of the body simultaneously because of
the interaction of this cluster of comets and the earth.
Q: Now, when you talk about the comet cluster, as you have on many occasions,
the technical definition of a comet is that it is a chunk of ice. Is this
the case with the comets in this cluster?
A: And other substances, primarily iridium cores.
(T) Can we ask one more quick question? NASA has announced that the space
telescope, Hubble, has detected clusters of comets, is this, in effect,
the beginning of the government's of the world preparing the people for
what is to come?
A: It certainly is a possibility, but, again, you are accessing a very
touchy area. Too much knowledge for you to gather in this particular area
would not be beneficial to you.
Q: There is a rumor going around that a large object is coming our way,
that is a gigantic, intelligently controlled space craft, loaded with
Lizzies. Could you comment on this please?
A: Comet cluster. Sitchen believes it is a "planet."
Q: In terms of this comet cluster, how many bodies are in this cluster
as a discrete unit?
Q: What is the ETA?
Q: Why is it open? Why can't we look at it and determine the factors,
the direction, trajectory, velocity...
A: If you could, you would be interrupted in your learning cycle.
Q: What exactly does THAT mean? (F) Because you would never do anything
else because all you would think about is the day the comet is coming!
Q: Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to
cause the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that they
will accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have "glitches".
2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events may intercede.
Q: Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot, big-wig guys
in the government who have plans for taking over the whole world and making
everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in charge, are just simply
not in synch with the fact that there are some definite earth changes
on the agenda? Are they missing something here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival of the
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask. Because,
remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are being presented
to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical realm, I.E. Earth changes.
This "may" be symbolism. Would most students of the subject understand
if prophecies were told directly in fourth density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism. For example,
the dream I had about the curling cloud which I saw in a distance and
knew it was death dealing and I interpreted it to be a tornado, but it
was, in fact, a dream of the Challenger disaster. I understood it to be
a tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got, a death dealing force
in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I guess my dream was a fourth density
representation but I tried to interpret it in terms I was familiar with.
Is this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by interpreting prophecies
in literal terms.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of the most
famous prognosticators of recent note, a large number of the prophecies
he made seemingly were erroneous in terms of their fulfillment. For example,
he prophesied that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though
certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini which are thought
by many to be remnants of Atlantis. These did, apparently, emerge from
the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that one is reading the event from 3rd density
into sixth density terms and then transmitting it back into 3rd, and while
the ideation was correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, were
slightly askew. Is that what we are dealing with here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are always looking
for literal translations of dates
A: Analogy is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract painting
and says "I don't get it."
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at least attempts
to get things into literal terms. I like realistic art work. I am a realist
in my art preferences. I want trees to look like trees and people to have
only two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some literalness in my
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into the ocean"
will always be interpreted as California falling into the ocean.
Q: (General uproar) (F) Wait a minute, what was the question? (L) I just
said I liked literalness in my prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what they are
saying. People believe that California is just going to go splat and that
Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that it's at 1800 feet
elevation, it's just going to drop down to sea level, or the sea level
is going to rise, but it's not going to affect Virginia Beach even though
that's at sea level. I mean... somehow Phoenix is just going to drop down
and none of the buildings are going to be damaged, even though its going
to fall 1800 feet... (T) Slowly. It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It
would have to be so slowly it's unbelievable how slowly it would have
to be. (T) It's been settling for the last five million years, we've got
a ways to go in the next year and a half! (F) Right! That's my point.
(T) In other words, when people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others
say California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not saying that
the whole state, right along the border is going to fall into the ocean,
they are using the term California to indicate that the ocean ledge along
the fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking on the water
side, because it is a major fracture. We understand that that is not literal.
Are you telling us that there is more involved here as far as the way
we are hearing what these predictions say?
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the ocean, we are
not talking about the whole state literally falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do this?
Q: (L) It could take three minutes or three hundred years. (T) Yes. That
is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on it. (T) Okay.
So they are thinking in the terms that one minute California will be there
and a minute and a half later it will be all gone. Is this what you are
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into the ocean,
which is just the analogy we are using, we are talking about, as far as
earth changes, is the possibility that several seismic events along the
fault line, which no one really knows the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? Symbolic of what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That's like sending us out to translate
a book in Latin without even giving us a Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a cluster of
comets connected in some interactive way with our solar system, and that
this cluster of comets comes into the plane of the ecliptic every 3600
years. Is this correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th level, where
all realities are different.
Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster of comets is riding the realm border wave.
Does this mean that when it comes into the solar system, that its effect
on the solar system, or the planets within the solar system, (Jan or us),
may or may not be mitigated by the fact of this transition? Is this a
A: Will be mitigated.
Q: (L) Does any of this mean that the earth changes that have been predicted,
may not, in fact, occur in physical reality as we understand it?
A: You betcha
Q: (L) Does this mean that all of this running around and hopping and
jumping to go here and go there and do this and do that is...
A: That is strictly 3rd level thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd level thinking, and if a lot of these things
are symbolic, I am assuming they are symbolic of movement or changes in
Q: (L) And, if these changes in energy occur does this mean that the population
of the planet are, perhaps, in groups or special masses of groups, are
they defined as the energies that are changing in these descriptions of
events and happenings of great cataclysm. Is it like a cataclysm of the
soul on an individual and or collective basis?
Q: (L) When the energy changes to 4th density, and you have already told
us that people who are moving to 4th density when the transition occurs,
that they will move into 4th density, go through some kind of rejuvenation
process, grow new teeth, or whatever, what happens to those people who
are not moving to 4th density, and who are totally unaware of it? Are
they taken along on the wave by, in other words, piggy-backed by the ones
who are aware and already changing in frequency, or are they going to
be somewhere else doing something else? (T) In other words, we are looking
at the fact that what's coming this time is a wave that's going to allow
the human race to move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your entire sector of space/time.
Q: (T) Okay, when the people are talking about the earth changes, when
they talk in literal terms about the survivors, and those who are not
going to survive, and the destruction and so forth and so on, in 3rd,
4th, 5th level reality we are not talking about the destruction of the
planet on 3rd level physical terms, or the loss of 90 per cent of the
population on the 3rd level because they died, but because they are going
to move to 4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting "warm."
Q: (T) Okay. So, when they talk about 90 per cent of the population
not surviving, it is not that they are going to die, but that they are
going to transform. We are going to go up a level. This is what the whole
light thing is all about?
A: Or another possibility is that the physical cataclysms will occur only
for those "left behind" on the remaining 3rd level density earth.
Q: (L) Let me get this straight. When we move through this conduit, are
A: You will be on the 4th level earth as opposed to 3rd level earth.
Q: (L) What I am trying to get here, once again, old practical Laura,
is trying to get a handle on practical terms here. Does this mean that
a 4th density earth and a 3rd density earth will coexist side by side...
A: Not side by side, totally different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms interpenetrate one another but in different dimensions...
Q: (L) So, in other words, a being from say, 6th density, could look at
this planet we call the earth and see it spinning through space and see
several dimensions of earth, and yet the point of space/time occupation
is the same, in other words, simultaneous. (J) They can look down but
we can't look up.
Q: (L) So, in other words, while all of this cataclysmic activity is happening
on the 3rd dimensional earth, we will be just on our 4th dimensional earth
and this sort of thing won't be there, and we won't see the 3rd dimensional
people and they won't see us because we will be in different densities
which are not "en rapport", so to speak?
A: You understand concept, now you must decide if it is factual.
Q: (T) Let's see, last week we concentrated on MM, and you were
all busy trying to keep us out of trouble.
A: We would very much like to "concentrate" on things of worldly/universal
import. What do you suppose happens when the mantle stops, or slows, and
the crust does not?
Q: (L) Frank had a dream about this the other night, too. (T) About the
mantle slowing? Okay, if the mantle slows and the crust doesn't... (L)
It's like walking around the room, carrying a bowl of soup, and then stopping...
(T) It sloshes over because the crust keeps moving... water in all of
the oceans is going to slosh...
A: No sloshing.
Q: (L) Okay, what happens when the... is it that there will be lots of
A: Maybe, but what is the bigger picture?
Q: (L) The bigger picture is that the earth changes its orbital position,
velocity... (T) No. The bigger picture is that life on earth gets pretty
well wiped out.
Q: (L) It exchanges energy potentials with other bodies?
Q: (J) Gravity changes...
Q: (L) Gravity changes, ok... gravity lessens...
A: What have we hinted about gravity.
Q: (L) Oh, gravity is the binder... (T) and is the one truth of the universe.
Q: (T) The element. Gravity is the one true element. This is what you're
Q: (L) So, if gravity is lessened, and it is the binder, then, everything...
ohhh, I see what you're getting at! (J) Yes, gravity is the binder. Without
gravity, it just all fall s apart...
A: Not "Falls apart," my dear, it all "opens up!"
Q: (L) And when it opens up what happens?
Q: (L) So, in other words, this cosmic event is the catalyst for the change
in those human beings who are ready and prepared to experience it in a
A: Well, sort of, but... Remember... There is no "supernatural" or "paranormal,"
only natural and normal. Your 'Noah Syndrome' implied, originally, a discrimination
between "wicked" and good. Being ready does not recognize such distinctions!
Q: (L) What does being ready imply?
A: Being on the verge of tranformation to next density level, be it STO
or STS. So, you see, the transformation maintains the balance!
A: Now, for the remainder of this session, we wish to address the
so called earth changes for your benefit, as you are stuck here. Those
present need to be equipped to stop buying into popular deceptions once
and for all! Reread Bramley.
Q: (L) Funny I took him off the shelf today... Ok, address the subject.
A: All such changes are caused by three things and three things only!
1) Human endeavors. 2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth.
3) Planetary orbital aberrations.
Q: (L) All right, carry on.
A: Don't believe any of the nonsense you hear from other sources. It is
designed to facilitate mass programming and deception.
Q: (L) Oh, okay.
A: Just as your bible says; "You will know not the day, nor the hour."
This means there is no warning. None. No clue. No prophecy. And these
events are of the "past" as well.
Q: (V) What events of the past, as well?
A: Cosmic and "man made" cataclysms.
Q: (L) Well, since you put 'man-made' on the list, am I to infer that
perhaps some of the activities of the consortium, the secret government,
are going to precipitate some of these events?
Q: (L) Yes. Okay, is there any more that you want to say on this? Go ahead,
you have the floor. Please.
A: Ask away.
Q: (L) Well, you've said that there's a comet cluster that's coming this
way. Is that still correct?
Q: (L) Is this body that has been called Hale-Bopp, is this that comet
Q: (L) Is this comet cluster that's coming, and you've indicated that
it could arrive anywhere between 12 and 18 years, something like that,
is that correct?
Q: (L) Now, is this something that can be seen from a great way off?
Q: (L) Is this something that's going to impact our particular immediate
location, and appear suddenly, as this comet that has flown overhead just
did? Nobody saw it until a very short time ago, and all of a sudden everybody
A: The cluster is a symptom, not the focus.
Q: (V) What is the focus?
A: Wave, remember, is "realm border" crossing... what does this imply?
Consult your knowledge base for Latin roots and proceed.
Q: (L) So, the Latin root of realm is regimen, which means a domain or
rulership or a system for the improvement of health. Does this mean that,
and as I assume we are now moving into the STO realm, now, out of the
Q: (L) And also, can I infer from this, that the comet cluster exists
in the other realm?
Q: (L)Well, previously, you had said that the comet cluster would come
before the realm border. Which indicated that the comet...
Q: (L) Well, how can something so... you said it appears to be one single
large body, and that our government knows that it's on it's way, and that
apparently somebody has spotted it. Which direction is it coming from?
Q: (L) Well, the comet cluster. That comet cluster, is, I am assuming,
a real body, in third density experience, right? A part of a real cluster
of bodies in third density experience. Is that correct?
A: Cluster can approach from all directions.
Q: (L) So, can I infer from what has been said, that we are going to move
into this comet cluster, as into a realm?
A: Border changes rules.
Q: (L) But if we run into the comet cluster before we cross the border,
then, I mean, I would understand if we were going into the realm border
A: Part in part out.
Q: (L) OK, is this so-called HAARP project instrumental in any of these
realm border changes, these realm changes?
A: All is interconnected, as usual.
Q: (L) Sheldon Nidle has written a book called "Becoming a Galactic Human."
He has said that the Earth is going to go into a photon belt sometime
this summer, that there is going to be 3 days of darkness, and the poo
is going to hit the fan, so to speak, the aliens are going to land in
the late summer or the fall, and they are all coming here to help us.
Could you comment on these predictions?
Q: (L) Is a fleet of aliens going to land on Earth and be announced by
the media in 1996?
Q: (P) In 1997?
Q: (L) Could you comment on the source of this book: "Three days of Darkness,"
by Divine Mercy?
Q: (L) Well, is there going to be 3 days of darkness in 1998 like it says?
A: Why does this continue to be such a popular notion? And, why is everyone
so obsessed with, are you ready for this, triviA:..? Does it matter if
there is three days of darkness?!? Do you think that is the "be all and
end all?" What about the reasons for such a thing?... at all levels, the
ramifications? It's like describing an atomic war in prophecy by saying:
"Oh my, oh my, there is going to be three hours of a lot of big bangs,
Q: (L) Well, you didn't say it wasn't going to happen in the fall of 1998.
A: First of all, as we have warned you repeatedly, it is literally impossible
to attach artificially conceived calendar dates to any sort of prophecy
or prediction for the many reasons that we have detailed for you numerous
times. [Note: the 'fluid' nature of the future. Probability, etc.] And
we have not said that this was going to happen.
Q: (L) I know that you are saying that this 3 days of darkness is trivial
considering the stupendous things that are involved in realm crossings.
But, a lot of these people are interpreting this as just 3 days of darkness..
then wake up in paradise. I would like to have some sort of response to
A: Trust us to lead you when and how it is appropriate. You should already
know that to attempt apply 3rd density study and interpretations to 4th
density events and realities is useless in the extreme... This is why
UFO researchers keep getting 3 new questions for every 1 answer they seek
with their "research." If you will trust us, we will always give you not
only the most correct answers to each and every inquiry, but also the
most profound answers. If the individual does not understand, then that
means they are either prejudiced, or not properly tuned in.
Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I
have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the
story of the sun's companion brown star [to read about this subject, click
url at bottom of this page] which is apparently approaching the solar
system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that
is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen.
Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?
A: Flat eliptical.
Q: (A) But how close will it come?
A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of
locator of witness.
Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A) Solar system...
(L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets... which
one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud...
(L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs
A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this
on its way "in."
Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.
Q: (A) So, it will not approach...
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance
of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes, but what I
want to know... this Oort cloud is around the solar system, so this brown
star, once it has passed through... (L) It must already be in the solar
system? (A) No, it could have passed through and may not come closer.
Is it coming closer or not? Is it coming closer all the time?
A: Solar system, in concert with "mother star," is revolving around companion
star, a "brown" star.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much...
Q: (A) Less?
A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, eliptical
orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of
brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding
outer planets and their moons.
Q: (A) But I understand that the distance that the distance between the
sun and this brown star is changing with time. Eliptical orbit means there
is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was,
or what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What
is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light
year, or less or more?
A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to
the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to
Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?
A: 0 to 14.
Q: (A) Okay, that's it. I have some idea about this. Now, I understand
that, either by chance or by accident, two things are going to happen
at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star,
and this comet cluster. These are two different things?
A: Yes. Different, but related.
Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some kind of orbit
of its own, that continues to orbit...
Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also additional
comets that are going to get whacked into the solar system by the passing
of this brown star?
Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come from this
A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle which corresponds
to the passage of comet cluster.
Q: (A) I understant that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every
3600 years. I want to know something about the shape of this comet cluster.
I can hardly imagine...
A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of passage.
Q: (L) So, it could be spread out... (A) We were asking at some point
where it will be coming from. The answer was that we were supposed to
look at a spirograph.
Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not come from one
direction, but from many directions at once. Is this correct?
A: Very good!!!
Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions...
A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.
Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?
A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!
Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.
A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time table of
cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of catastrophe. Earth
benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time to start paying attention
to the signs. They are escalating. They can even be "felt" by you and
others, if you pay attention.
Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?
Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The rain, the fires, the
Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time with no ostensible
A: And low, too.
Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too. Not too
long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low for this time
of year. (L) And also the signs in people - these kids killing their parents,
all these people going berserk - you know...
Q: (L) What do you mean spike?
A: On a graph...
Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie...
A: Spikes are big.
Q: (L) Well, from what you are saying about this - I mean how are we supposed
to do all these things you say we are supposed to do? I mean, we won't
A: Who says?
Q: (L) That is kind of what it is sounding like. Unless our lives and
experiences escalate in concert with all these other events... (A) I have
a last question which I have prepared. So, we have these two physical
disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but
we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this
time it is accompanied by a plane convergence.
A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.
Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it's
supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border.
A: Realm. What is root of "realm?"
Q: (L) Reality.
A: Yes. How does the magnetic field "plug in?" Other planchette, please.
Carbon disturbance, as someone "melted" crystal on top. [We replaced planchette.]
We want to stay on this general subject matter through this session, for
Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on on the planet,
these fires and so forth - you never said anything about all these fires
in FloridA: You said Arizona was going to burn, but you never said Florida
was going to burn...
A: We did not say it would not.
Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a couple of signs
in the last day or so that we are going to have a change in the weather,
a break, is my little method of predicting...
A: Reverse extreme?!?
Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better than fires...
but, maybe not!
A: Italy and Greece are burning too.
Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a relationship
between Italy and Greece and where we are on the planet? Some kind of
A: Just same current malady.
Q: (L) Okay, back to the comet cluster and realm border...
A: Not yet.
Q: (L) Well, which direction should we take right now?
A: Step by step.
Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in our weather.
Are there any other conditions that we should be aware of at the present
A: Point is to watch, look, listen.
Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there some particular
thing we are supposed to be watching for that is to give us a clue about
Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point when we
perceive a particular clue or event at some point?
A: What would you suggest?
Q: (L) I don't know that I would suggest anything except to keep a low
profile and keep on working until we figure out the answer. It is like
a race against time. We have to figure out the answer because, obviously,
you are not going to tell us...
A: No. No race needed.
Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all of this.
A: Stop thinking 3rd density!
Q: (L) Well, I don't want to just live in LaLa land and say, 'oh yes,
I'm watching. I see the signs! I'm looking! I'm listening! And then count
them off on my fingers and say: but I'm not gonna think about it because
that's 3rd density!' See what I am saying here?
A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to have a "front
row seat," and enjoy!
Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying myself so much!
I feel guilty!
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Well! I'm supposed to be DOING something!
A: You are.
Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some signals,
and these signals cause a certain pattern of thinking which were not yet
able to emerge, but now, after you receive certain signals, you start
to think in a different way. So, you cannot now think in a different way,
but when you learn this and this has happened, then you start to think
in a different pattern. So, you cannot now do things, but you always have
to be ready to change your thinking at any moment when you understand
more, when you see more, when you notice more, when you put things together
which are not yet together. Then, there may be a big change of perspective,
a total change. And this we have to keep our minds and thinking patterns
open and ready to change, and work and put the puzzle and mosaic together.
And, this is all that counts. It is this work that we are now doing that
counts, not some future big thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No, it is
only doing our best, and what is it? Our best? It will change. I believe
so. That is the ideA: So, everything depends on this.
A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which is not anticipatable.
Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject, so let us
move another step.
A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike.
Q: (L) Is that a clue? Is this one of those obscure remarks? Yes, I noticed,
the kids killing their parents, all the shooting going on, the weather...
is this connected in some way to some other event?
A: 27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest you awaken your
internet pals, as they are too busy chasing "goblins" to notice.
Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?
A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering subduction quake
in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We estimate 10.4 on the Richter scale. We
have warned of Ranier. Imagine a 150 meter high tsunami in Puget Sound...
Q: (L) Does this subduction quake have anything to do with that UFO that
was rumored to have buried itself in the Pacific?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (L) The information I got on that was that it was about 600 mile north
and east of Hawaii. A couple of submersibles were sent down and disappeared
or were destroyed or didn't come back... it is supposedly giving off a
lot of energy. Any comment?
Q: (L) Should I follow that direction?
A: All directions lead to lessons.
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that you don't
usually give predictions, why have you done so now?
A: We do not give time tables.
Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and a big subduction
quake... 10.4 on the Richter scale is almost inconceivable.
A: Ranier... caldera.
Q: (L) What about the caldera?
A: Expect one.
Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?
A: All areas experience accelerating "freak weather patterns."
Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre things going
on on the planet, how does it relate to the comet cluster and the brown
star? Is it related?
A: Human experiential cycle intersects.
Q: (L) Any specifice physical manifestation of either this brown star
or this comet cluster or this realm border, that is related to these events
on the planet?
A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in turn causes
effects which in turn stimulates further "heating up" of activity...
Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term 'birth of the spike.'
Is there something or someone that was born at that particular time?
A: No. Spike is as on a graph...
Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves, and if so,
what types of events would we include to create the background data?
A: "El Nino, La Nina," etc...
Q: (L) Is this El Nino thing connected to sunspot cycles?
Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don't think it has been tracked for long
enough to get...
A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.
Q: (L) I read where Edgar Cayce said that a sligth increase in global
temperature would make hurricanes something like 5 times stronger... given
a baseline temperature. Does this mean we are going to have stronger and
more frequent hurricanes?
Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out in the ocean?
A: Either, or.
Q: (A) I want to continue questions from the previous session. First,
about this companion star: where is it now; which part of the zodiac?
A: Libra Constellation.
Q: (A) Where is the periodic comet cluster?
A: Not visible. It approaches in "scatter pattern," indicating that one
or two of the members may have already made the circuit.
Q: (A) We have been told that it will look like one solid object at first.
A: Yes, but not necessarily only one grouping. Will show up first in the
region of the Magellanic Clouds.
Q: (A) So, we have the ideA: Next question concerning this companion star;
we were told that its mass is less than the sun, can we have a figure
on how much less?
A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun.
Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to approach
the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means that the sun will
really start to feel its gravity, and because of this, the solar system
will start to move with respect to other stars, so all the constellations
will shift, is this correct?
A: More like a slight "wobble" effect.
Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth?
A: Only through measurements.
Q: (T) There have been a lot of reports of late regarding major solar
activity, solar flares, solar winds, etc. The surface of the sun has a
whole lot going on. The last I heard, one of the two satellites observing
the sun, one of them is gone. Is this an effect from the sun itself, or
is this an effect of the approaching brown dwarf?
A: The sun.
Q: (T) As the brown dwarf approaches, will it intensify the solar flare
A: The effect on the physical orientation of the sun from the periodic
passage of its companion is to flatten the sphere slightly. This returns
to its original spherical shape with the retreat.
Q: (L) Is this flattening of the sphere of the sun going to have any noticeable
effects in terms of enhanced, accelerated, or magnified radiation from
Q: (T) Solar flares or anything like that?
Q: (T) So there is not going to be any appreciable effect on the planet
from this as far as the sun goes?
A: The sun's gravity increases, thus inhibiting flares.
Q: (T) Inhibiting flares is good. (L) Not necessarily. Solar minimums
have been periods of ice ages. (T) One of the recent crop circles this
year shows what the crop circle interpreters say is an image of the sun
with a large solar flare coming off of it. It is supposed to be a warning
to us that the surface of the sun has become unstable...
A: All events intersect.
Q: (A) Okay, I would like to ask what kind of effects other than just
gravity we should expect from the close passage of this star? Any particular
electro-magnetic, gamma radiation, or what to look for? In which part
of the spectrum?
A: Radiation emits from those cosmic bodies which radiate.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the brown star does not radiate?
Q: (L) If it doesn't radiate, what does it do?
A: Its radioactive field is severely limited as the "fire" went out long
ago. It does not give off light.
Q: (J) It's a brown star. (T) One or two steps away from being a collapsing
black hole. (L) Well, that's friendly, especially after watching "Event
Horizon" last night!
A: No. Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change of the magnetic
field of the earth. Does this mean that the magnetic pole will shift?
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a complete pole
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause this magnetic
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the substrata rock,
brought on by the interaction of Earth with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this disturbance?
Can you describe for us the steps by which this pole reversal will take
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely serve as trigger
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds up in the
mineral substrata that requires discharge, or that becomes excited to
the point that it discharges and then reverses? Is this what we are talking
about in terms of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align the spins of
the atoms which means one has to strike the metal, or one has to bring
a magnetic field close. (T) Strike as in annealing... heating and striking
metal or rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose so that
the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is hit, it reforms until
it cools again. (L) Is this what we are talking about here?
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align. But, where
is it going to come from?
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external magnetic field
strong enough to do something like that come from? On the earth, if you
supercharge the ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic field.
That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is what the HAARP group
of programs is about. That is what Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause
there is a large charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the people in
charge of the HAARP project know about all of this and are they constructing
this HAARP array to utilize this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be successful in 4th
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of thing is getting
ready to happen... never mind. (A) We have been told that this magnetic
disturbance is closely related to this realm border crossing, and you
asked us the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is reality. Now,
realm has an m at the end. Does this have something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance?
What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic
state of your environment.
Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...
A: Magnetic poles reverse.
Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change
in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree
- something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change
in the strength of the field?
A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes
all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn
with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably
longer than the others.]
Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?
Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?
A: Broader and larger.
Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?
A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side.
Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles.
"Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.
Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?
A: Larger and broader.
Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's
magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.
A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent
Q: (L) So, apparently long term and permanent exposure can make a big
Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming
into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are
different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation,
if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?
A: Picture biorythm graph.
Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?
A: 100,000 years, roughly.
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of physical disasters
that are going to happen and psychic changes related to the realm border.
What is cause and what is effect?
A: One precedes the other.
Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in psychic
Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the magnetic
field... does the reversal of the poles and the broadening of the magnetic
field, is that going to be before the realm border crossing?
Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe will be
a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of the Earth...
A: This has already begun.
Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and intensify.
And what we will observe is all of these things happening. And, as a result
of the intersecting of these various energies, this realm border, this
reality change, this change in the magnetics because of the interaction
with the comet cluster, the sun's companion, the realm border, and so
forth, it will then have an effect upon the people left on the planet
who will then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?
A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth and in
the Heavens in the last days.
Q: (L) Okay, this period of time after this realm border, is this period
a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it?
Q: (L) After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the
Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having
to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability
and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual
physical structures and psychic structures?
Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch and everything
is going to be different?
A: The key is awareness.
Q: (L) Are there going to be people...
Q: (L) You didn't let me finish asking my question!
A: But we knew it!
Q: (L) In other words, there are going to be people who are simply not
going to see what is happening?
A: Lost lambs beying in the knight.
Q: (T) They are not getting it. They are lost sheep. That really describes
it. (L) Why did you give that funny twist on the spelling?
A: Why not?
Q: (T) Now, didn't they tell us that when the transition occurs, those
who are moving to 4th density will move, and those who aren't, won't.
And that it is not a physical move. That we really would not notice a
difference when we shifted because it's all right here. And, those who
are going to shift will shift right where they stand, and they won't really
notice a change, and the perception is not the issue, it is the awareness
of the shift, because we will still be physical... am I heading anywhere
in the right direction?
A: Variability of physicality.
Q: (L) Does this have anything to do with changing of DNA via awareness?
A: Both ways.
Q: (T) So, we will notice that we can control much more than we could
before in terms of our environment and physical structure, but we will
still be doing a lot of things we have always done. Okay, good night.
JUNE 22, 1999 from Session Date: June 19, 1999
Q: ...there has been another matter that has come up in the past few days
that I would like to cover first. Apparently there is a newly discovered
comet that some people are suggesting fits the prophecies of Nostradamus
where he says in quatrain 10.72:
mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois, Du ciel
viendra vn grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Auant apres Mars regner par bon-heur.
translates into English:
year 1999, seventh month,
From the sky will come a great King of Terror: [see note below]
To bring back to life the great King of the Mongols,
Before and after Mars to reign by good luck.
for the comparison is because it is thought that Nostradamus was referring
to September and NOT July, and, in point of fact, this comet will have
made its circuit around the by September, and some folks are theorizing
that it could be 'vacuuming' and picking up a lot of matter which could
slow it down, change its direction, and cause it to interact with the
Earth in a detrimental way. Is this, in fact, going to happen?
A: Nostradamus had a specific date tied to a vague prediction.
Q: You are right. Yes, that's true. Are you suggesting that there is
some other event besides a cometary one that he is referring to in this
A: If he was, let it not be known. The question is: is "1999" a number,
or is it more? Perhaps it is best for you to see events in this subject
unfold, then analyze later. Maybe it is a beginning of a cycle...
June 29, 1999: Lemesurier says he is agnostic as to whether Nostradamus
was a true prophet or not, but that he nevertheless enjoys solving his
linguistic puzzles as an intellectual exercise. To interpret the "King
of Terror" quatrain Lemesurier has gone back to the original text
of 1555 and discovered that it actually refers to "roy deffraieur" (an
appeaser king). In subsequent corrupt editions, after the death of Nostradamus,
the word acquired an apostrophe to become "roy d'effraieur" (king of terror).
If this is truly the case, then all the speculations about a "king
of terror" are leading in the wrong direction.]
Q: Well, there is another thing that the 'Millennium Group' has brought
up, and that is the possibility that there is some object that has entered
our solar system and the increased sun-spot activity and so forth is a
reaction of the sun to this object or objects. Can you comment on this?
A: The sun needs no such prompting to react thusly. It is a reactor, after
all. It tends to react to less than others react to it.
Q: (A) But what is the 'it?' (L) And, the sunspot prediction was around
a hundred the other day, but the actual sun spot activity was 240, I believe.
Now, supposedly, when this Comet Lee swings around the sun during this
period of high sun-spot activity, the Millennium Group are saying that
it is going to discharge the solar capacitor and that there is a possibility
that great bolts of electricity will pass between planets and the comet
or between planets and other planets, or between the sun and the comet,
or something. Is this, in fact, likely to occur?
A: Bolts charge between positive and negative ions. What is the sun's
atomic structure vis a vis its "children?" Research this for definitive
answers to your question. What about the positive/negative ratio between
earth's ionosphere and possible passing "objects?"
Q: (L) Well, that's what I was asking. These fellows claim that there
will be discharges either between the sun and the comet, or the comet
and the planets, or the planets and the planets, or the sun and the planets...
all the bases are covered!
A: No they have not. What about the "vacuum" of space? We are posing a
question in order to stimulate intellectual debate and inquiry. Learning
is fun, after all!
Q: (A) I want to ask about the 'plasma theory of comets' which the Millennium
Group are promoting.
A: The plasma theory is correct, when certain factors are present. Could
it have something to do with the composition of the object in question?
Q: (A) This is exactly the question. The object in question is the comet,
and the question is: what is its composition, is it a dirty snowball,
or is it a charged object that collects particles on its way like the
'vacuum cleaner' model?
A: Nickel? We are almost desparately trying to "jump start" your intellectual
capacities. Remember, this is a group effort here. Not a series of questions
from the meek and helpless to the Lord High Commander!!
Q: (L) What do we know about nickel? (A) There are all kinds of things
about nickel. It is a metal. The question is whether nickel has anything
to do with this particular comet.
A: If it does, it could be vital. Most comets are indeed "dirty snowballs,"
composed largely of water ice and particulate matter. But, some are more
like fast moving asteroids caught up in an orbital plane. Your "Millennium
Group" is maybe just a bit too one-side-or-the-otherish at this point.
Thus, a spectral analysis of this object is in order before one assumes
it to be a cosmic vacuum cleaner.
Q: (A) I guess from this that, even if these guys can be in some cases
correct, this comet, after analyzing, will prove to be just an ordinary
dirty snowball. That is my guess.
A: No guessing allowed! Have we not already indicated? Knowledge is power.
If we give it to you like Halloween candy, it is diffused. What does molten
nickel look like against the backdrop of space? Does it conduct electricity?
Is it magnetic? What about the "tail" of such an object coming into contact
with the ionosphere?
Q: (L) Oh. I think I get it. The Nostradamus thing about a great comet's
tail or something... let me look it up:
great trouble for humanity, a greater one is prepared
The Great Mover renews the ages:
Rain, blood, milk, famine, steel and plague,
Is the heavens fire seen, a long spark running.
is supposed to refer to something that occurs at the turn of the Millennium...
is this what we are getting at here? Something that will look like a
'long spark running' which then comes in contact with the ionosphere
which may exchage potentials with the earth by virtue of this conducting,
molten nickel tail? Yes????? Is that good? (A) The point is that this
comet is in space. Space is rather cold, so the question is: what would
make nickel molten? (L) Well, it will be close to the sun! That will
heat it up! (A) This particular comet is not going to come close enough
to the sun to melt it! (L) Well then, how can the nickel be molten???
A: What about flares?
Q: (A) But it is not coming close enough to the sun to be caught in
a solar flare!
A: Is nickel magnetic? Does nickel have a companion?
Q: A) Well, when we say a 'companion,' it means another metal in the
same family in the Mendeleev Table. I will have to check...
A: And cobalt is invisible in the good old vacuum of space, but not
Q: L) Does that mean it will attract cobalt?
A: No, cobalt will attract.
Q: L) The cobalt will attract flares... electromagnetic phenomena...
A: Et al.
Q: (L) I see.
A: Now, you need to know the composition of this comet... And any other
closely following same. We have alluded to the increased cometary activity
before. Oort, and that which cyclically disturbs it.
Q: (L) I just want to know one thing... are any of these comets gonna
hit the earth?
A: Someday, certainly. As have before.
this session, I believe that the Cassiopaeans are suggesting that this
Comet Lee is NOT a threat to the Earth, but that there may be others that
follow, and that we can expect quite a show in the not too distant future.
the courtesy of Dr. Nicolas Biver, (Hawaii) we have received information
on recent spectral observations in the infra/red tu millimeter/centimeter
wavelengths of Comet Lee and, so far, it looks like a dirty snowball.
there are other contenders for the Nostradamus' prophecy...
McBeath, IMO Vice-President, e-mail: email@example.com
David Asher presented a paper to the International Meteor Conference
in Puimichel  describing a theoretical resonant swarm of particles
within the Taurid/Beta Taurid stream which could account for various
meteor shower enhancements, increased fireball fluxes and even meteoritic
impacts associated with the Taurid Complex of meteoroid streams, asteroids
and comets. He used this theory to suggest times when future returns
of the proposed "swarm" might lead to increased activity from the nighttime
Taurid showers active in October-November, and the daytime Beta Taurids
of June-July. He suggested that 1999 could see a return of the swarm
during the Beta Taurid activity period, which is the purpose of this
reminder warning now. Results from late October 1998  suggested an
enhanced Taurid period had been detected by radio and visual observers
in the closing days of the month, along with an increased flux of minor
Taurid fireballs (magnitudes -3 to -8). Another of David's predictions
for the swarm was that a recurrence might be expected in October-November
1998, which may well be what was recorded."
 D. Asher,
"Meteoroid Swarms and the Taurid Complex", in: "Proceedings IMC, Puimichel
1993", ed. P. Roggemans, IMO, 1993, pp.88-91.
 A. McBeath,
"SPA Meteor Section Results: September-October 1998", WGN, (in press).
 G. W.
Kronk, "Meteor Showers: A Descriptive Catalog", Enslow, 1988, pp.115-118.
 A. McBeath,
"The Forward Scatter Meteor Year", in: "Proceedings IMC, Petnica 1997,
eds. A. Knoefel & A. McBeath, IMO, 1998, pp.39-54.
of the "Millennium Group" suggests that "supernova explosions create the
chunks of matter that become the seed comet nuclei and that they come
at us from the sites of the old explosion, the fast ones arriving sooner
and the slower ones later, but they come from exactly the same location
in intergalactic space."
interesting. Consider the following:
first year of the period Chih-ho, the fifth moon, the day chi-ch'ou,
a guest star appeared approximately several inches southeast of Thien-kuan.
After more than a year it gradually became invisible." (Statement of
Toktaga and Ouyang Hsuan, fourteenth century Chinese authors of the
official history of the Sung dynasty)
Chinese, guest stars were well worth noting and, indeed, looking out
for. They believed that humans lived on Earth in a kingdom roofed with
stars, and that human destiny was subject to a 'COSMIC WIND.'
star was also seen and recorded by Japanese astronomers. They noted
its appearance 'in the orbit of Orion,' as bright as the planet Jupiter,
in early June 1054.
are NO European records of this guest star. One of the puzzles about
the ancient observations of the supernova of 1054 is the question as
to why a new star which was as bright as Venus, visible in daylight
for 3 weeks, and visible in the night sky ffor 2 years, should go unrecorded
in European annals. Supernovae were neither totally unprecedented nor
unknown in historical sources available in Europe.
explanation that has been advanced for the lack of records of this supernova
is that its appearance coincided with the split in Christianity between
the Roman Church and the Greek Orthodox... July 16, 1054. This was what
was known as the 'Great Schism.' The Church Fathers might have found
it expedient to expunge from history such a dramatic portent..." including
many other historical documents...
textbook, Uyun al-Anba, composed by Ibn Abi Usaybia in about AD 1242,
contains a statement by Ibn Butlan (a Christian physician from Baghdad,
who had lived in Cairo and in Constantinople between 1052 and 1055).
Butlan said: ' One of the well-known epidemics of our time is that which
occurred when the spectacular star appeared in Gemini in the year 446
in question, given in Islamic dates, lasted from April 12, 1054 to April
1, 1055. The reference to Gemini rather than to Taurus can be understood
as a reference to the precession of the equinox.
the date and position, and the general circumstances of the observation
suggest that Butlan was ascribing to the supernova of AD 1054, the cause
of a noteworthy plague (which, by his account, spread from Constantinople
where 14,000 people perished, to Egypt where it killed most of the population
of Cairo, and to Iraq, the Yemen and Syria). Butlan's explanation is
in general agreement with the belief that diseases were influences from
the stars; the word 'influenza' still preserves this belief in European
for Butlan's aside, there are no other definite western records of the
AD 1054 supernova in Euorpe. The records are silent about an event which
must have been an astronomical spectacle far outshining such pale rivals
as Halley's Comet, which appeared 12 years later and was commemorated
in the Bayeux Tapestry." (quoted from "Supernovae,"
by Paul and Lesley Murdin: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
of this supernova of 1054 is called the Crab Nebula. Its distance from
earth is about 6500 light years which means that it actually occurred
about 7500 BC.
have any idea how long it would take these "cosmic vaccum cleaners" to
arrive... how much longer after the visible light arrives would the matter
get here, considering that it would be slowed down in space due to accumulation
seems that the Cassiopaean's are onto something in the above excerpts,
because I was reading about the stages of a supernova, and, according
to a couple of guys, Stanford Woosley and David Arnett, who independently
developed a theory that explains the light curve of a supernova, a supernova
originates from a star with a dense core of iron. The core becomes unstable
and expodes, releasing a substantial amount of radioactive nickel-56.
The radioactive decay of nickel into cobalt-56 and then into stable iron-56
produces gamma rays that illuminate the surrounding gas. This illumination
is the primary source of energy that makes the supernova shine.
So, in the
clues the Cassiopaean's were giving about comets, it seems that they were
pointing somewhat in this direction, that we ought to be watching for
something in the way of a cometary shower that we may never have experienced
before, that derives from an ancient supernova. Or, on the other hand,
one that has a VERY LONG [3,600 years, perhaps?] period of return as stated
in many other sessions.
Added August 30, 1999
date: August 28, 1999
mind as you read the following the "Prime Directive" of the Cassiopaeans
which is that Free Will cannot be abridged which is what would result
if certain things were told to us outright. Also keep in mind their famous
tendency to use puns and double and triple entendres.
Q: (L) There were several dark streaks seen in the sky at the time of
the recent solar eclipse. There has been a great deal of comment about
this at various sites on the internet including some of the 'hard science'
astronomical ones, yet there is no general consensus as to what they
were. There were also strange lights and objects seen around the sun,
and later, 'things' or 'shadows' reported crossing the surface of the
moon. There is also an ongoing discussion about some sort of 'Incoming
Object' as though there is an anomalous object in our solar system that
is creating this effect. Now, I realize that you said before that we
ought to watch for something AFTER Comet Lee, the exact words being
' Now, you need to know the composition of this comet... And any other
closely following same. We have alluded to the increased cometary activity
before. Oort, and that which cyclically disturbs it.' So, it does seem
that what you were alluding to is transpiring at the present. I mean,
'closely following' probably means close in terms of time, also. And
you did say that such comets as have been disturbed would approach in
a 'scatter pattern,' which would mean from any and all directions. Can
you comment on these current events?
A: Not yet.
Q: Why? Is there something we should be watching for?
A: Best to keep watching.... Be open to all possibilities.
Q: Are we on the verge of a) an alien invasion; b) a cometary impact;
c) the appearance of a twin sun, a death star in our solar system?
A: Wait and see.
Q: I don't want to wait and see! (A) Wait and see! When it hits us,
we will know! (L) Let me ask this....
A: What a glorious transition to 4th density STO. With maybe a quick
stopover in 5th just to pick up a few things for the trip!
Q: Are you saying that we are getting ready for the Big Kahuna?
A: Only Don Ho knows for sure.
A: Well, you did say "Kahuna," yes?
Q: Okay, you have repeatedly, in the past year, alluded to something
that we are supposed to be watching for, that we are supposed to 'enjoy
the show,' and all that sort of thing. Now you have made this remark
about 5th density, where 3rd density goes at death. Are you suggesting
that a lot of folks are going to check out?
A: Maybe we were trying to Lighten things up a bit!
Q: That's all fine and good, but I just want one word here, a clue about
what is coming down in the near future that you are making all these
hints about... just a one word clue?
Q: Now wait a minute! You can't DO that! What do you mean 'kaboom?'
I changed my mind, I want two words! One more word!
Q: Okay, a word that applies to us sitting right here....
Q: We KNOW it's Florida! What about a word that will give me a clue
about our location in terms of this 'kaboom' and 'splat' business?
Q: (A) I guess that means it will be hot here, but safe.
A: Okay. Hot but safe, maybe.
Q: Kaboom and splat? Does that relate to what you said about C____ last
year when I asked if she had a plan to fulfill that she was not attending
to at present and you said 'Fate will intercede.' When I asked HOW fate
was going to intercede, you said 'Do you really want to know?' So, I
said that I just wanted a one word clue, and you said: 'CRUNCH.' Is
this what we are talking about here? Can we connect these dots?
A: Oh no, she is in the mountains. So of course, she is safe!!!
Q: (A) She is safe because she is in the mountains?
A: Humor, people!
Q: So that is a backward clue?
A: Open. .
was all they would say about it! Go figure! But, before getting hysterical,
I would like to point out that "kaboom!" and "splat!" could apply equally
to a cometary event as well as a major solar flare and CME. After all,
CME's are the result of explosions on the sun, and when they impact the
Earth, it could be considered a "splat." If, by any chance, the Cassiopaeans
are correct, and a dark "companion sun" is sneaking into our solar system,
it would account for a number of recent anomalous events. And, this could
all tie in with the Velikovskian idea of comets as "cosmic vacuum cleaners,"
as described by the Millennium Group. A larger comet with EM properties
could stimulate unheard of solar activity. Re-read above the funny clues
about Comet Lee and if anybody has any insights, e-mail me.
October 7, 1999:
all the antics of the rumor mongers on the internet, monitoring all the
information sites, scientific, current events oriented, and others, the
only thing that can have been construed to have been a "kaboom splat"
type event during the period in question was the loss of the Mars probe
which did, indeed, go "kaboom! splat!" The ostensible reason
for this was claimed to have been a mix-up in measurement conversions
from metric to inches. I am not sure if this is a good explanation. Perhaps
this probe was acted against in such a way that it went "kaboom!"
and then "splat!" on the surface of Mars? Just a thought.
course, "near" in terms of "time" to the Cassiopaeans,
can often mean a rather longer period of time than we generally consider
as "soon." In my own experience, "soon" as described
by them, amounted to three years!
point I would like to mention regarding Nostradamus is the following:
Nostredame, or Nostradamus, one of the most acclaimed of post-Biblical
prophets, has been claimed to have had a very good record of "hits." Unfortunately,
it is often difficult to determine how good due to the obscurity of his
prophetic style. It is usually after the fact that his quatrains are discovered
to be "incredibly accurate." And, the same quatrains have been discovered
to be "incredibly accurate" for DIFFERENT EVENTS by different
So, we have
to be very careful about getting ourselves all in an uproar about such
things. The Cassiopaeans have remarked about the impossibility of accurate
prediction due to the "fluid nature" of the Universe and have
Q: (P) I would like to know about the apparitions of the Virgin Mary
at Conyers, GA, as well as this book "Mary's Message to the World" and
all the other messages about the End Times that are coming out all over?
A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated
so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they
are aware of prophetic and philosophical patternings and usually shift
course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.
taking the above into consideration, if, as is claimed, Nostradamus was
a Jew, might he not have been referring to a Jewish reckoning of months
when he spoke about the "Seventh Month?" In such a case, what
month would that be? Certainly not the modern Western July or even September...
just a thought. If anyone knows what month this might be, let me know.
Let me emphasize
again that we don't need to get hysterical about any of it. There is so
much in the way of lies and disinformation raging through the internet,
the media, and in our world in general, that it does none of us any good
to get excited about what is going on around us. We all need to keep a
cool head and watch what is going on around us. If the "negative
forces" do, in fact, feed on fear and panic, they have been on a
veritable feeding frenzy in the past few months!
Continue to: Comets, Twin Sun, Armageddon?
FAIR USE NOTICE This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in
our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
The owners and publishers
of these pages wish to state that the material presented here that is the product
of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication is offered
with the caveat that the reader ought always to research on their own. We invite
the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical
mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism"
nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in
all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either
possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind
will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Cassiopaean materials Copyright © 1994-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a
registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become
the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly
prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: Could Not Write to File _cass_earth2_htm].