Asteroid Impact on Earth


Cometary Showers,
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse?

The Nemesis Hypothesis
A Mystery Revolves Around the Sun


Signs of The Times

SITE MAP

SOTT Daily News and Commentary

The SOTT Quick Guide

Note to New Readers

Archives

Search

Cassiopaea Forum

BOOKS

Cassiopaea

Introduction The Cassiopaean Experiment in Superluminal Communication (9 files)

 The Exorcist in Love by Thomas French, St. Petersburd Times
Cassiopaea FAQ
 

The Secret History of The World by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Discover the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!

 

High Strangeness

The Truth about Hyperdimensional Beings and Alien Abductions

 
The Wave

New Expanded Wave Series Now in Print!

 

Support The Quantum Future Group and The Signs Team

How you can help keep Signs of The Times online...

 
 
The material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!

Anti-War WebRing
[prev] [list] [???] [join] [next]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Few Words About Radiometric Dating

The most widely-used method for determining the age of fossils is to date them by the "known age" of the rock strata in which they are found. At the same time, the most widely-used method for determining the age of the rock strata is to date them by the "known age" of the fossils they contain. In this "circular dating" method, all ages are based on uniformitarian assumptions about the date and order in which fossilized plants and animals are believed to have evolved. Most people are surprised to learn that there is, in fact, no way to directly determine the age of any fossil or rock. The so called "absolute" methods of dating (radiometric methods) actually only measure the present ratios of radioactive isotopes and their decay products in suitable specimens - not their age. These measured ratios are then extrapolated to an "age" determination.

The problem with all radiometric "clocks" is that their accuracy critically depends on several starting assumptions which are largely unknowable. To date a specimen by radiometric means, one must first know the starting amount of the parent isotope at the beginning of the specimen's existence. Second, one must be certain that there were no daughter isotopes in the beginning. Third, one must be certain that neither parent nor daughter isotopes have ever been added or removed from the specimen. And fourth, one must be certain that the decay rate of parent isotope to daughter isotope has always been the same. That one or more of these assumptions are often invalid is obvious from the published radiometric "dates" (to say nothing of "rejected" dates) found in the literature.

One of the most obvious problems is that several samples from the same location often give widely-divergent ages. Apollo moon samples, for example, were dated by both uranium-thorium-lead and potassium-argon methods, giving results which varied from 2 million to 28 billion years. Lava flows from volcanoes on the north rim of the Grand Canyon (which erupted after its formation) show potassium-argon dates a billion years "older" than the most ancient basement rocks at the bottom of the canyon. Lava from underwater volcanoes near Hawaii (that are known to have erupted in 1801 AD) have been "dated" by the potassium-argon method with results varying from 160 million to nearly 3 billion years. It's really no wonder that all of the laboratories that "date" rocks insist on knowing in advance the "evolutionary age" of the strata from which the samples were taken -- this way, they know which dates to accept as "reasonable" and which to ignore.

More precisely, it is based on the assumption that nothing "really exceptional" happened in the meantime. What I mean by "really exceptional" is this: an event theoretically possible, but whose mechanism is not yet understood in terms of the established paradigms. To give an example: a crossing of two different universes. This is theoretically possible, taking into account modern physical theories, but it is too speculative to discuss its "probability" and possible consequences.

Could such an event change radioactive decay data? Could it change the values of some fundamental physical constants? Yes it could.

Is it possible that similar events have happened in the past? Yes, it is possible. How possible it is? We do not know. We do not know, in fact, what would be an exact meaning of 'crossing of two different universes.'

In addition to considering the idea of cataclysms that could have destroyed ancient civilizations more than once, there is another matter to consider in special relationship to radioactive decay: that ancient civilizations may have destroyed themselves with nuclear war.

Radiocarbon dates for Pleistocene remains in northeastern North America, according to scientists Richard Firestone of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and William Topping, are younger?as much as 10,000 years younger?than for those in the western part of the country. Dating by other methods like thermoluminescence (TL), geoarchaeology, and sedimentation suggests that many radiocarbon dates are grossly in error. For example, materials from the Gainey Paleoindian site in Michigan, radiocarbon dated at 2880 yr BC, are given an age by TL dating of 12,400 BC. It seems that there are so many anomalies reported in the upper US and in Canada of this type, that they cannot be explained by ancient aberrations in the atmosphere or other radiocarbon reservoirs, nor by contamination of data samples (a common source of error in radiocarbon dating). Assuming correct methods of radiocarbon dating are used, organic remains associated with an artifact will give a radiocarbon age younger than they actually are only if they contain an artificially high radiocarbon keel.
Our research indicates that the entire Great Lakes region (and beyond) was subjected to particle bombardment and a catastrophic nuclear irradiation that produced secondary thermal neutrons from cosmic ray interactions. The neutrons produced unusually large quantities of Pu239 and substantially altered the natural uranium abundance rations in artifacts and in other exposed materials including cherts , sediments, and the entire landscape. These neutrons necessarily transmuted residual nitrogen in the dated charcoals to radiocarbon, thus explaining anomalous dates. []
The C14 level in the fossil record would reset to a higher value. The excess global radiocarbon would then decay with a half-life of 5730 years, which should be seen in the radiocarbon analysis of varied systems.[]
Sharp increases in C14 are apparent in the marine data at 4,000, 32,000-34,000, and 12,500 BC. These increases are coincident with geomagnetic excursions. []
The enormous energy released by the catastrophe at 12,500 BC could have heated the atmosphere to over 1000 C over Michigan, and the neutron flux at more northern locations would have melted considerable glacial ice. Radiation effects on plants and animals exposed to the cosmic rays would have been lethal, comparable to being irradiated in a 5 megawatt reactor more than 100 seconds.
The overall pattern of the catastrophe matches the pattern of mass extinction before Holocene times. The Western Hemisphere was more affected than the Eastern, North America more than South America, and eastern North America more than western North America. Extinction in the Great lakes area was more rapid and pronounced than elsewhere. Larger animals were more affected than smaller ones, a pattern that conforms to the expectation that radiation exposure affects large bodies more than smaller ones. [Firestone, Richard B., Topping, William, Terrestrial Evidence of a Nuclear Catastrophe in Paleoindian Times, dissertation research, 1990 - 2001.]

The evidence that Firestone and Topping discovered is puzzling for a lot of reasons. But, the fact is, there are reports of similar evidence from such widely spread regions as India, Ireland, Scotland, France, and Turkey; ancient cities whose brick and stone walls have literally been vitrified, that is, fused together like glass.

The questions which relate to "Earth Changes" are scattered throughout the more than 1,000 pages of text that have been delivered to date... Here is a selection of some of the most pertinent to the CAUSES and RESULTS ... and, it is mostly through questions regarding the past and cycles of history that we were given insight as to our future.

One of the earliest questions we asked was regarding the fate of the dinosaurs.


Q: (L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
Q: (L) Did a comet actually strike the earth?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was it a large comet?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How large?
A: The largest was 18 miles diameter, but no one was large enough for event.  14 hit at that occasion.
Q: (L) Is there any regular periodicity or cycle to this comet business?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is the period?
A: 3600 years roughly.
Q: (L) Where are these cometary showers from?
A: Clusters in their own orbit.
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets orbit around the sun?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) Is this cluster of comets the remains of a planet?
A: No.
Q: (L) What body were the Sumerians talking about when they described the Planet of the crossing or Nibiru?
A: Comets.
Q: (L) This body of comets you have talked about?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets appear to be a single body as Sitchen describes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Now, this cluster of comets, when was the last time it came into the solar system?
A: 3582 yrs ago.
Q: (L) So, when is this cluster expected to hit the plane of the ecliptic again?
A: 12 to 18 years. [This session was in 1994]
Q: (L) How long has this comet cluster been part of our solar system?
A: 890 million years.
Q: (L) What was the origin of this comet cluster? Was it originally a large planet?
A: No.  Your government already knows they're coming close again.
Q: (L) You said that the orbit is around the Sun. Where does it enter the plane of the ecliptic?
A: Varies.
Q: (L) Does it enter between Mars and Jupiter, for example?
A: Sometimes.
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic? Or is it at an angle?
A: Not correct idea structure. Picture a spirograph.
Q: (L) Do the comets orbit around themselves. Do they have a sort of axis?
A: No.
Q: (L) How many are in this cluster?
A: Varies.
Q: (L) Do they lose or pick any up from time to time?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How big is the biggest one at this time?
A: 900 miles diameter. Spirograph.
Q: (L) According to my calculations, the comet cluster came by 8,788 B.C., is that correct?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) Was there any historical cataclysm recorded in history that we could relate to that passing?
A: No.
Q: (L) And this was part of the great flood that occurred 12,388 B.C., is that correct?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Now, you have said that Venus was drawn into the solar system by the gravitational pull of the cluster of comets?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where did Venus get all its gases and clouds and so forth? What was its origin? Where did it get all this stuff?
A: Collected during fiery, friction filled journey and space matter in general.
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
Q: (L) Now, I have compared certain passages of Revelations to the work of Immanuel Velikovsky, were those sections accurate in what they describe?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there going to be massive disruption on the planet and maybe a lot of people transitioning out of the body simultaneously because of the interaction of this cluster of comets and the earth.
A: Close.
Q: Now, when you talk about the comet cluster, as you have on many occasions, the technical definition of a comet is that it is a chunk of ice. Is this the case with the comets in this cluster?
A: And other substances, primarily iridium cores.
[...]
Q: (T) Can we ask one more quick question? NASA has announced that the space telescope, Hubble, has detected clusters of comets, is this, in effect, the beginning of the government's of the world preparing the people for what is to come?
A: It certainly is a possibility, but, again, you are accessing a very touchy area. Too much knowledge for you to gather in this particular area would not be beneficial to you.
Q: There is a rumor going around that a large object is coming our way, that is a gigantic, intelligently controlled space craft, loaded with Lizzies. Could you comment on this please?
A: Comet cluster. Sitchen believes it is a "planet."
Q: In terms of this comet cluster, how many bodies are in this cluster as a discrete unit?
A: Variable.
Q: What is the ETA?
A: Open.
Q: Why is it open? Why can't we look at it and determine the factors, the direction, trajectory, velocity...
A: If you could, you would be interrupted in your learning cycle.
Q: What exactly does THAT mean? (F) Because you would never do anything else because all you would think about is the day the comet is coming!
[...]
 Q: Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to cause the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that they will accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
Q: Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have "glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events may intercede.
Q: Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot, big-wig guys in the government who have plans for taking over the whole world and making everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in charge, are just simply not in synch with the fact that there are some definite earth changes on the agenda? Are they missing something here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival of the cometary cluster?
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
[...]
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask. Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism. For example, the dream I had about the curling cloud which I saw in a distance and knew it was death dealing and I interpreted it to be a tornado, but it was, in fact, a dream of the Challenger disaster. I understood it to be a tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got, a death dealing force in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I guess my dream was a fourth density representation but I tried to interpret it in terms I was familiar with. Is this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by interpreting prophecies in literal terms.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of the most famous prognosticators of recent note, a large number of the prophecies he made seemingly were erroneous in terms of their fulfillment. For example, he prophesied that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini which are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis. These did, apparently, emerge from the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that one is reading the event from 3rd density into sixth density terms and then transmitting it back into 3rd, and while the ideation was correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, were slightly askew. Is that what we are dealing with here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are always looking for literal translations of dates
A: Analogy is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract painting and says "I don't get it."
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at least attempts to get things into literal terms. I like realistic art work. I am a realist in my art preferences. I want trees to look like trees and people to have only two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into the ocean" will always be interpreted as California falling into the ocean.
Q: (General uproar) (F) Wait a minute, what was the question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what they are saying. People believe that California is just going to go splat and that Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that it's at 1800 feet elevation, it's just going to drop down to sea level, or the sea level is going to rise, but it's not going to affect Virginia Beach even though that's at sea level. I mean... somehow Phoenix is just going to drop down and none of the buildings are going to be damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet... (T) Slowly. It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It would have to be so slowly it's unbelievable how slowly it would have to be. (T) It's been settling for the last five million years, we've got a ways to go in the next year and a half! (F) Right! That's my point. (T) In other words, when people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not saying that the whole state, right along the border is going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking on the water side, because it is a major fracture. We understand that that is not literal. Are you telling us that there is more involved here as far as the way we are hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do this?
Q: (L) It could take three minutes or three hundred years. (T) Yes. That is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on it. (T) Okay. So they are thinking in the terms that one minute California will be there and a minute and a half later it will be all gone. Is this what you are saying?
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into the ocean, which is just the analogy we are using, we are talking about, as far as earth changes, is the possibility that several seismic events along the fault line, which no one really knows the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? Symbolic of what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That's like sending us out to translate a book in Latin without even giving us a Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a cluster of comets connected in some interactive way with our solar system, and that this cluster of comets comes into the plane of the ecliptic every 3600 years. Is this correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th level, where all realities are different.
Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster of comets is riding the realm border wave. Does this mean that when it comes into the solar system, that its effect on the solar system, or the planets within the solar system, (Jan or us), may or may not be mitigated by the fact of this transition? Is this a mitigating factor?
A: Will be mitigated.
Q: (L) Does any of this mean that the earth changes that have been predicted, may not, in fact, occur in physical reality as we understand it?
A: You betcha
Q: (L) Does this mean that all of this running around and hopping and jumping to go here and go there and do this and do that is...
A: That is strictly 3rd level thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd level thinking, and if a lot of these things are symbolic, I am assuming they are symbolic of movement or changes in energy.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, if these changes in energy occur does this mean that the population of the planet are, perhaps, in groups or special masses of groups, are they defined as the energies that are changing in these descriptions of events and happenings of great cataclysm. Is it like a cataclysm of the soul on an individual and or collective basis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When the energy changes to 4th density, and you have already told us that people who are moving to 4th density when the transition occurs, that they will move into 4th density, go through some kind of rejuvenation process, grow new teeth, or whatever, what happens to those people who are not moving to 4th density, and who are totally unaware of it? Are they taken along on the wave by, in other words, piggy-backed by the ones who are aware and already changing in frequency, or are they going to be somewhere else doing something else? (T) In other words, we are looking at the fact that what's coming this time is a wave that's going to allow the human race to move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your entire sector of space/time.
Q: (T) Okay, when the people are talking about the earth changes, when they talk in literal terms about the survivors, and those who are not going to survive, and the destruction and so forth and so on, in 3rd, 4th, 5th level reality we are not talking about the destruction of the planet on 3rd level physical terms, or the loss of 90 per cent of the population on the 3rd level because they died, but because they are going to move to 4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting "warm."
Q: (T) Okay.  So, when they talk about 90 per cent of the population not surviving, it is not that they are going to die, but that they are going to transform. We are going to go up a level. This is what the whole light thing is all about?
A: Or another possibility is that the physical cataclysms will occur only for those "left behind" on the remaining 3rd level density earth.
[...]
Q: (L) Let me get this straight. When we move through this conduit, are the other...
A: You will be on the 4th level earth as opposed to 3rd level earth.
Q: (L) What I am trying to get here, once again, old practical Laura, is trying to get a handle on practical terms here. Does this mean that a 4th density earth and a 3rd density earth will coexist side by side...
A: Not side by side, totally different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms interpenetrate one another but in different dimensions...
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a being from say, 6th density, could look at this planet we call the earth and see it spinning through space and see several dimensions of earth, and yet the point of space/time occupation is the same, in other words, simultaneous. (J) They can look down but we can't look up.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words, while all of this cataclysmic activity is happening on the 3rd dimensional earth, we will be just on our 4th dimensional earth and this sort of thing won't be there, and we won't see the 3rd dimensional people and they won't see us because we will be in different densities which are not "en rapport", so to speak?
A: You understand concept, now you must decide if it is factual.
[...]
 Q: (T) Let's see, last week we concentrated on MM, and you were all busy trying to keep us out of trouble.
A: We would very much like to "concentrate" on things of worldly/universal import. What do you suppose happens when the mantle stops, or slows, and the crust does not?
Q: (L) Frank had a dream about this the other night, too. (T) About the mantle slowing? Okay, if the mantle slows and the crust doesn't... (L) It's like walking around the room, carrying a bowl of soup, and then stopping... (T) It sloshes over because the crust keeps moving... water in all of the oceans is going to slosh...
A: No sloshing.
Q: (L) Okay, what happens when the... is it that there will be lots of earthquakes?
A: Maybe, but what is the bigger picture?
Q: (L) The bigger picture is that the earth changes its orbital position, velocity... (T) No. The bigger picture is that life on earth gets pretty well wiped out.
A: No.
Q: (L) It exchanges energy potentials with other bodies?
A: No.
Q: (J) Gravity changes...
A: Warmer...
Q: (L) Gravity changes, ok... gravity lessens...
A: What have we hinted about gravity.
Q: (L) Oh, gravity is the binder... (T) and is the one truth of the universe.
A: Element.
Q: (T) The element. Gravity is the one true element. This is what you're saying?
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, if gravity is lessened, and it is the binder, then, everything... ohhh, I see what you're getting at! (J) Yes, gravity is the binder. Without gravity, it just all fall s apart...
A: Not "Falls apart," my dear, it all "opens up!"
Q: (L) And when it opens up what happens?
A: Change.
Q: (L) So, in other words, this cosmic event is the catalyst for the change in those human beings who are ready and prepared to experience it in a positive way...
A: Well, sort of, but... Remember... There is no "supernatural" or "paranormal," only natural and normal. Your 'Noah Syndrome' implied, originally, a discrimination between "wicked" and good. Being ready does not recognize such distinctions!
Q: (L) What does being ready imply?
A: Being on the verge of tranformation to next density level, be it STO or STS. So, you see, the transformation maintains the balance!
[...]
 A: Now, for the remainder of this session, we wish to address the so called earth changes for your benefit, as you are stuck here. Those present need to be equipped to stop buying into popular deceptions once and for all! Reread Bramley.
Q: (L) Funny I took him off the shelf today...  Ok, address the subject.
A: All such changes are caused by three things and three things only! 1) Human endeavors. 2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth. 3) Planetary orbital aberrations.
Q: (L) All right, carry on.
A: Don't believe any of the nonsense you hear from other sources. It is designed to facilitate mass programming and deception.
Q: (L) Oh, okay.
A: Just as your bible says; "You will know not the day, nor the hour." This means there is no warning. None. No clue. No prophecy. And these events are of the "past" as well.
Q: (V) What events of the past, as well?
A: Cosmic and "man made" cataclysms.
Q: (L) Well, since you put 'man-made' on the list, am I to infer that perhaps some of the activities of the consortium, the secret government, are going to precipitate some of these events?
A: No.
Q: (L) Yes. Okay, is there any more that you want to say on this? Go ahead, you have the floor. Please.
A: Ask away.
Q: (L) Well, you've said that there's a comet cluster that's coming this way. Is that still correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this body that has been called Hale-Bopp, is this that comet cluster?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this comet cluster that's coming, and you've indicated that it could arrive anywhere between 12 and 18 years, something like that, is that correct?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Now, is this something that can be seen from a great way off?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this something that's going to impact our particular immediate location, and appear suddenly, as this comet that has flown overhead just did? Nobody saw it until a very short time ago, and all of a sudden everybody sees it?
A: The cluster is a symptom, not the focus.
Q: (V) What is the focus?
A: Wave, remember, is "realm border" crossing... what does this imply? Consult your knowledge base for Latin roots and proceed.
Q: (L) So, the Latin root of realm is regimen, which means a domain or rulership or a system for the improvement of health. Does this mean that, and as I assume we are now moving into the STO realm, now, out of the STS realm?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) And also, can I infer from this, that the comet cluster exists in the other realm?
A: Partly.
Q: (L)Well, previously, you had said that the comet cluster would come before the realm border. Which indicated that the comet...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, how can something so... you said it appears to be one single large body, and that our government knows that it's on it's way, and that apparently somebody has spotted it. Which direction is it coming from?
A: Direction?
Q: (L) Well, the comet cluster. That comet cluster, is, I am assuming, a real body, in third density experience, right? A part of a real cluster of bodies in third density experience. Is that correct?
A: Cluster can approach from all directions.
Q: (L) So, can I infer from what has been said, that we are going to move into this comet cluster, as into a realm?
A: Border changes rules.
Q: (L) But if we run into the comet cluster before we cross the border, then, I mean, I would understand if we were going into the realm border first...
A: Part in part out.
Q: (L) OK, is this so-called HAARP project instrumental in any of these realm border changes, these realm changes?
A: All is interconnected, as usual.
[...]
Q: (L) Sheldon Nidle has written a book called "Becoming a Galactic Human." He has said that the Earth is going to go into a photon belt sometime this summer, that there is going to be 3 days of darkness, and the poo is going to hit the fan, so to speak, the aliens are going to land in the late summer or the fall, and they are all coming here to help us. Could you comment on these predictions?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is a fleet of aliens going to land on Earth and be announced by the media in 1996?
A: No.
Q: (P) In 1997?
A: No.
Q: (L) Could you comment on the source of this book: "Three days of Darkness," by Divine Mercy?
A: Source?!?
Q: (L) Well, is there going to be 3 days of darkness in 1998 like it says?
A: Why does this continue to be such a popular notion? And, why is everyone so obsessed with, are you ready for this, triviA:..? Does it matter if there is three days of darkness?!? Do you think that is the "be all and end all?" What about the reasons for such a thing?... at all levels, the ramifications? It's like describing an atomic war in prophecy by saying: "Oh my, oh my, there is going to be three hours of a lot of big bangs, oh my!!"
Q: (L) Well, you didn't say it wasn't going to happen in the fall of 1998. Is it?
A: First of all, as we have warned you repeatedly, it is literally impossible to attach artificially conceived calendar dates to any sort of prophecy or prediction for the many reasons that we have detailed for you numerous times. [Note: the 'fluid' nature of the future. Probability, etc.] And we have not said that this was going to happen.
Q: (L) I know that you are saying that this 3 days of darkness is trivial considering the stupendous things that are involved in realm crossings. But, a lot of these people are interpreting this as just 3 days of darkness.. then wake up in paradise. I would like to have some sort of response to this question.
A: Trust us to lead you when and how it is appropriate. You should already know that to attempt apply 3rd density study and interpretations to 4th density events and realities is useless in the extreme... This is why UFO researchers keep getting 3 new questions for every 1 answer they seek with their "research." If you will trust us, we will always give you not only the most correct answers to each and every inquiry, but also the most profound answers. If the individual does not understand, then that means they are either prejudiced, or not properly tuned in.

July 4, 1998


Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun's companion brown star [to read about this subject, click url at bottom of this page] which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?
A: Flat eliptical.
Q: (A) But how close will it come?
A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.
Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A) Solar system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets... which one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud... (L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it...
A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this on its way "in."
Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.
Q: (A) So, it will not approach...
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes, but what I want to know... this Oort cloud is around the solar system, so this brown star, once it has passed through... (L) It must already be in the solar system? (A) No, it could have passed through and may not come closer. Is it coming closer or not? Is it coming closer all the time?
A: Solar system, in concert with "mother star," is revolving around companion star, a "brown" star.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much...
A: Less.
Q: (A) Less?
A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, eliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their moons.
Q: (A) But I understand that the distance that the distance between the sun and this brown star is changing with time. Eliptical orbit means there is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was, or what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more?
A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to happen?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?
A: 0 to 14.
Q: (A) Okay, that's it. I have some idea about this. Now, I understand that, either by chance or by accident, two things are going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are two different things?
A: Yes. Different, but related.
Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some kind of orbit of its own, that continues to orbit...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also additional comets that are going to get whacked into the solar system by the passing of this brown star?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come from this comet cluster...
A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle which corresponds to the passage of comet cluster.
Q: (A) I understant that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every 3600 years. I want to know something about the shape of this comet cluster. I can hardly imagine...
A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of passage.
Q: (L) So, it could be spread out... (A) We were asking at some point where it will be coming from. The answer was that we were supposed to look at a spirograph.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not come from one direction, but from many directions at once. Is this correct?
A: Very good!!!
Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions...
A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.
Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?
A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!
Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.
A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time to start paying attention to the signs. They are escalating. They can even be "felt" by you and others, if you pay attention.
Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?
Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The rain, the fires, the heat...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time with no ostensible explanation...
A: And low, too.
Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too. Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low for this time of year. (L) And also the signs in people - these kids killing their parents, all these people going berserk - you know...
A: Spike.
Q: (L) What do you mean spike?
A: On a graph...
Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie...
A: Spikes are big.
Q: (L) Well, from what you are saying about this - I mean how are we supposed to do all these things you say we are supposed to do? I mean, we won't have time!
A: Who says?
Q: (L) That is kind of what it is sounding like. Unless our lives and experiences escalate in concert with all these other events... (A) I have a last question which I have prepared. So, we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied by a plane convergence.
A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.
Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it's supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border.
A: Realm. What is root of "realm?"
Q: (L) Reality.
A: Yes. How does the magnetic field "plug in?" Other planchette, please. Carbon disturbance, as someone "melted" crystal on top. [We replaced planchette.] We want to stay on this general subject matter through this session, for your sake.
Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on on the planet, these fires and so forth - you never said anything about all these fires in FloridA: You said Arizona was going to burn, but you never said Florida was going to burn...
A: We did not say it would not.
Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a couple of signs in the last day or so that we are going to have a change in the weather, a break, is my little method of predicting...
A: Reverse extreme?!?
Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better than fires... but, maybe not!
A: Italy and Greece are burning too.
Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a relationship between Italy and Greece and where we are on the planet? Some kind of psychic link?
A: Just same current malady.
Q: (L) Okay, back to the comet cluster and realm border...
A: Not yet.
Q: (L) Well, which direction should we take right now?
A: Step by step.
Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in our weather. Are there any other conditions that we should be aware of at the present time?
A: Point is to watch, look, listen.
Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there some particular thing we are supposed to be watching for that is to give us a clue about something?
A: All.
Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point when we perceive a particular clue or event at some point?
A: What would you suggest?
Q: (L) I don't know that I would suggest anything except to keep a low profile and keep on working until we figure out the answer. It is like a race against time. We have to figure out the answer because, obviously, you are not going to tell us...
A: No. No race needed.
Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all of this.
A: Stop thinking 3rd density!
Q: (L) Well, I don't want to just live in LaLa land and say, 'oh yes, I'm watching. I see the signs! I'm looking! I'm listening! And then count them off on my fingers and say: but I'm not gonna think about it because that's 3rd density!' See what I am saying here?
A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to have a "front row seat," and enjoy!
Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying myself so much! I feel guilty!
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Well! I'm supposed to be DOING something!
A: You are.
Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some signals, and these signals cause a certain pattern of thinking which were not yet able to emerge, but now, after you receive certain signals, you start to think in a different way. So, you cannot now think in a different way, but when you learn this and this has happened, then you start to think in a different pattern. So, you cannot now do things, but you always have to be ready to change your thinking at any moment when you understand more, when you see more, when you notice more, when you put things together which are not yet together. Then, there may be a big change of perspective, a total change. And this we have to keep our minds and thinking patterns open and ready to change, and work and put the puzzle and mosaic together. And, this is all that counts. It is this work that we are now doing that counts, not some future big thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No, it is only doing our best, and what is it? Our best? It will change. I believe so. That is the ideA: So, everything depends on this.
A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which is not anticipatable.
Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject, so let us move another step.
A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike.
Q: (L) Is that a clue? Is this one of those obscure remarks? Yes, I noticed, the kids killing their parents, all the shooting going on, the weather... is this connected in some way to some other event?
A: 27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest you awaken your internet pals, as they are too busy chasing "goblins" to notice.
Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?
A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering subduction quake in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We estimate 10.4 on the Richter scale. We have warned of Ranier. Imagine a 150 meter high tsunami in Puget Sound...
Q: (L) Does this subduction quake have anything to do with that UFO that was rumored to have buried itself in the Pacific?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (L) The information I got on that was that it was about 600 mile north and east of Hawaii. A couple of submersibles were sent down and disappeared or were destroyed or didn't come back... it is supposedly giving off a lot of energy. Any comment?
A: No.
Q: (L) Should I follow that direction?
A: All directions lead to lessons.
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that you don't usually give predictions, why have you done so now?
A: We do not give time tables.
Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and a big subduction quake... 10.4 on the Richter scale is almost inconceivable.
A: Ranier... caldera.
Q: (L) What about the caldera?
A: Expect one.
Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?
A: All areas experience accelerating "freak weather patterns."
Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre things going on on the planet, how does it relate to the comet cluster and the brown star? Is it related?
A: Human experiential cycle intersects.
Q: (L) Any specifice physical manifestation of either this brown star or this comet cluster or this realm border, that is related to these events on the planet?
A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in turn causes effects which in turn stimulates further "heating up" of activity...
Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term 'birth of the spike.' Is there something or someone that was born at that particular time?
A: No. Spike is as on a graph...
Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves, and if so, what types of events would we include to create the background data?
A: "El Nino, La Nina," etc...
Q: (L) Is this El Nino thing connected to sunspot cycles?
A: No.
Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don't think it has been tracked for long enough to get...
A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.
Q: (L) I read where Edgar Cayce said that a sligth increase in global temperature would make hurricanes something like 5 times stronger... given a baseline temperature. Does this mean we are going to have stronger and more frequent hurricanes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out in the ocean?
A: Either, or.

July 11, 1998


Q: (A) I want to continue questions from the previous session. First, about this companion star: where is it now; which part of the zodiac?
A: Libra Constellation.
Q: (A) Where is the periodic comet cluster?
A: Not visible. It approaches in "scatter pattern," indicating that one or two of the members may have already made the circuit.
Q: (A) We have been told that it will look like one solid object at first.
A: Yes, but not necessarily only one grouping. Will show up first in the region of the Magellanic Clouds.
Q: (A) So, we have the ideA: Next question concerning this companion star; we were told that its mass is less than the sun, can we have a figure on how much less?
A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun.
Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to approach the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means that the sun will really start to feel its gravity, and because of this, the solar system will start to move with respect to other stars, so all the constellations will shift, is this correct?
A: More like a slight "wobble" effect.
Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth?
A: Only through measurements.
Q: (T) There have been a lot of reports of late regarding major solar activity, solar flares, solar winds, etc. The surface of the sun has a whole lot going on. The last I heard, one of the two satellites observing the sun, one of them is gone. Is this an effect from the sun itself, or is this an effect of the approaching brown dwarf?
A: The sun.
Q: (T) As the brown dwarf approaches, will it intensify the solar flare activity?
A: The effect on the physical orientation of the sun from the periodic passage of its companion is to flatten the sphere slightly. This returns to its original spherical shape with the retreat.
Q: (L) Is this flattening of the sphere of the sun going to have any noticeable effects in terms of enhanced, accelerated, or magnified radiation from the sun?
A: No.
Q: (T) Solar flares or anything like that?
A: No.
Q: (T) So there is not going to be any appreciable effect on the planet from this as far as the sun goes?
A: The sun's gravity increases, thus inhibiting flares.
Q: (T) Inhibiting flares is good. (L) Not necessarily. Solar minimums have been periods of ice ages. (T) One of the recent crop circles this year shows what the crop circle interpreters say is an image of the sun with a large solar flare coming off of it. It is supposed to be a warning to us that the surface of the sun has become unstable...
A: All events intersect.
Q: (A) Okay, I would like to ask what kind of effects other than just gravity we should expect from the close passage of this star? Any particular electro-magnetic, gamma radiation, or what to look for? In which part of the spectrum?
A: Radiation emits from those cosmic bodies which radiate.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the brown star does not radiate?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If it doesn't radiate, what does it do?
A: Its radioactive field is severely limited as the "fire" went out long ago. It does not give off light.
Q: (J) It's a brown star. (T) One or two steps away from being a collapsing black hole. (L) Well, that's friendly, especially after watching "Event Horizon" last night!
A: No. Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change of the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that the magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which this pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely serve as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds up in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or that becomes excited to the point that it discharges and then reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align the spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the metal, or one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T) Strike as in annealing... heating and striking metal or rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose so that the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is hit, it reforms until it cools again. (L) Is this what we are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align. But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external magnetic field strong enough to do something like that come from? On the earth, if you supercharge the ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic field. That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is what the HAARP group of programs is about. That is what Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause there is a large charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
A: No.
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of this and are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be successful in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of thing is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We have been told that this magnetic disturbance is closely related to this realm border crossing, and you asked us the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is reality. Now, realm has an m at the end. Does this have something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.
Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...
A: Magnetic poles reverse.
Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree - something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the field?
A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]
Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?
A: Broader and larger.
Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?
A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.
Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?
A: Larger and broader.
Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.
A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent exposure.
Q: (L) So, apparently long term and permanent exposure can make a big difference.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have said that they are different events, but that they are related. Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the deeper relation between these two phenomena?
A: Picture biorythm graph.
Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?
A: 100,000 years, roughly.
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of physical disasters that are going to happen and psychic changes related to the realm border. What is cause and what is effect?
A: One precedes the other.
Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in psychic terms?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the magnetic field... does the reversal of the poles and the broadening of the magnetic field, is that going to be before the realm border crossing?
A: Intersection.
Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe will be a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of the Earth...
A: This has already begun.
Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and intensify. And what we will observe is all of these things happening. And, as a result of the intersecting of these various energies, this realm border, this reality change, this change in the magnetics because of the interaction with the comet cluster, the sun's companion, the realm border, and so forth, it will then have an effect upon the people left on the planet who will then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?
A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth and in the Heavens in the last days.
Q: (L) Okay, this period of time after this realm border, is this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all life on it?
A: No.
Q: (L) After all of this change, those people who continue to be on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic structures?
A: No.
Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch and everything is going to be different?
A: The key is awareness.
Q: (L) Are there going to be people...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You didn't let me finish asking my question!
A: But we knew it!
Q: (L) In other words, there are going to be people who are simply not going to see what is happening?
A: Lost lambs beying in the knight.
Q: (T) They are not getting it. They are lost sheep. That really describes it. (L) Why did you give that funny twist on the spelling?
A: Why not?
Q: (T) Now, didn't they tell us that when the transition occurs, those who are moving to 4th density will move, and those who aren't, won't. And that it is not a physical move. That we really would not notice a difference when we shifted because it's all right here. And, those who are going to shift will shift right where they stand, and they won't really notice a change, and the perception is not the issue, it is the awareness of the shift, because we will still be physical... am I heading anywhere in the right direction?
A: Variability of physicality.
Q: (L) Does this have anything to do with changing of DNA via awareness?
A: Both ways.
Q: (T) So, we will notice that we can control much more than we could before in terms of our environment and physical structure, but we will still be doing a lot of things we have always done. Okay, good night.


ADDED JUNE 22, 1999 from Session Date: June 19, 1999


Q: ...there has been another matter that has come up in the past few days that I would like to cover first. Apparently there is a newly discovered comet that some people are suggesting fits the prophecies of Nostradamus where he says in quatrain 10.72:

L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois, Du ciel
viendra vn grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Auant apres Mars regner par bon-heur.

which translates into English:

The year 1999, seventh month,
From the sky will come a great King of Terror: [see note below]
To bring back to life the great King of the Mongols,
Before and after Mars to reign by good luck.

The reason for the comparison is because it is thought that Nostradamus was referring to September and NOT July, and, in point of fact, this comet will have made its circuit around the by September, and some folks are theorizing that it could be 'vacuuming' and picking up a lot of matter which could slow it down, change its direction, and cause it to interact with the Earth in a detrimental way. Is this, in fact, going to happen?
A: Nostradamus had a specific date tied to a vague prediction.
Q: You are right. Yes, that's true. Are you suggesting that there is some other event besides a cometary one that he is referring to in this prediction?
A: If he was, let it not be known. The question is: is "1999" a number, or is it more? Perhaps it is best for you to see events in this subject unfold, then analyze later. Maybe it is a beginning of a cycle...

[Note added June 29, 1999: Lemesurier says he is agnostic as to whether Nostradamus was a true prophet or not, but that he nevertheless enjoys solving his linguistic puzzles as an intellectual exercise. To interpret the "King of Terror" quatrain Lemesurier has gone back to the original text of 1555 and discovered that it actually refers to "roy deffraieur" (an appeaser king). In subsequent corrupt editions, after the death of Nostradamus, the word acquired an apostrophe to become "roy d'effraieur" (king of terror). If this is truly the case, then all the speculations about a "king of terror" are leading in the wrong direction.]

Q: Well, there is another thing that the 'Millennium Group' has brought up, and that is the possibility that there is some object that has entered our solar system and the increased sun-spot activity and so forth is a reaction of the sun to this object or objects. Can you comment on this?
A: The sun needs no such prompting to react thusly. It is a reactor, after all. It tends to react to less than others react to it.
Q: (A) But what is the 'it?' (L) And, the sunspot prediction was around a hundred the other day, but the actual sun spot activity was 240, I believe. Now, supposedly, when this Comet Lee swings around the sun during this period of high sun-spot activity, the Millennium Group are saying that it is going to discharge the solar capacitor and that there is a possibility that great bolts of electricity will pass between planets and the comet or between planets and other planets, or between the sun and the comet, or something. Is this, in fact, likely to occur?
A: Bolts charge between positive and negative ions. What is the sun's atomic structure vis a vis its "children?" Research this for definitive answers to your question. What about the positive/negative ratio between earth's ionosphere and possible passing "objects?"
Q: (L) Well, that's what I was asking. These fellows claim that there will be discharges either between the sun and the comet, or the comet and the planets, or the planets and the planets, or the sun and the planets... all the bases are covered!
A: No they have not. What about the "vacuum" of space? We are posing a question in order to stimulate intellectual debate and inquiry. Learning is fun, after all!
Q: (A) I want to ask about the 'plasma theory of comets' which the Millennium Group are promoting.
A: The plasma theory is correct, when certain factors are present. Could it have something to do with the composition of the object in question?
Q: (A) This is exactly the question. The object in question is the comet, and the question is: what is its composition, is it a dirty snowball, or is it a charged object that collects particles on its way like the 'vacuum cleaner' model?
A: Nickel? We are almost desparately trying to "jump start" your intellectual capacities. Remember, this is a group effort here. Not a series of questions from the meek and helpless to the Lord High Commander!!
Q: (L) What do we know about nickel? (A) There are all kinds of things about nickel. It is a metal. The question is whether nickel has anything to do with this particular comet.
A: If it does, it could be vital. Most comets are indeed "dirty snowballs," composed largely of water ice and particulate matter. But, some are more like fast moving asteroids caught up in an orbital plane. Your "Millennium Group" is maybe just a bit too one-side-or-the-otherish at this point. Thus, a spectral analysis of this object is in order before one assumes it to be a cosmic vacuum cleaner.
Q: (A) I guess from this that, even if these guys can be in some cases correct, this comet, after analyzing, will prove to be just an ordinary dirty snowball. That is my guess.
A: No guessing allowed! Have we not already indicated? Knowledge is power. If we give it to you like Halloween candy, it is diffused. What does molten nickel look like against the backdrop of space? Does it conduct electricity? Is it magnetic? What about the "tail" of such an object coming into contact with the ionosphere?
Q: (L) Oh. I think I get it. The Nostradamus thing about a great comet's tail or something... let me look it up:

After great trouble for humanity, a greater one is prepared
The Great Mover renews the ages:
Rain, blood, milk, famine, steel and plague,
Is the heavens fire seen, a long spark running.

This one is supposed to refer to something that occurs at the turn of the Millennium... is this what we are getting at here? Something that will look like a 'long spark running' which then comes in contact with the ionosphere which may exchage potentials with the earth by virtue of this conducting, molten nickel tail? Yes????? Is that good? (A) The point is that this comet is in space. Space is rather cold, so the question is: what would make nickel molten? (L) Well, it will be close to the sun! That will heat it up! (A) This particular comet is not going to come close enough to the sun to melt it! (L) Well then, how can the nickel be molten???
A: What about flares?
Q: (A) But it is not coming close enough to the sun to be caught in a solar flare!
A: Is nickel magnetic? Does nickel have a companion?
Q: A) Well, when we say a 'companion,' it means another metal in the same family in the Mendeleev Table. I will have to check...
A: And cobalt is invisible in the good old vacuum of space, but not nickel!
Q: L) Does that mean it will attract cobalt?
A: No, cobalt will attract.
Q: L) The cobalt will attract flares... electromagnetic phenomena...
A: Et al.
Q: (L) I see.
A: Now, you need to know the composition of this comet... And any other closely following same. We have alluded to the increased cometary activity before. Oort, and that which cyclically disturbs it.
Q: (L) I just want to know one thing... are any of these comets gonna hit the earth?
A: Someday, certainly. As have before.

After studying this session, I believe that the Cassiopaeans are suggesting that this Comet Lee is NOT a threat to the Earth, but that there may be others that follow, and that we can expect quite a show in the not too distant future.

Through the courtesy of Dr. Nicolas Biver, (Hawaii) we have received information on recent spectral observations in the infra/red tu millimeter/centimeter wavelengths of Comet Lee and, so far, it looks like a dirty snowball.

Seems that there are other contenders for the Nostradamus' prophecy...

From Alastair McBeath, IMO Vice-President, e-mail: vice_president@imo.net

"In 1993 David Asher presented a paper to the International Meteor Conference in Puimichel [1] describing a theoretical resonant swarm of particles within the Taurid/Beta Taurid stream which could account for various meteor shower enhancements, increased fireball fluxes and even meteoritic impacts associated with the Taurid Complex of meteoroid streams, asteroids and comets. He used this theory to suggest times when future returns of the proposed "swarm" might lead to increased activity from the nighttime Taurid showers active in October-November, and the daytime Beta Taurids of June-July. He suggested that 1999 could see a return of the swarm during the Beta Taurid activity period, which is the purpose of this reminder warning now. Results from late October 1998 [2] suggested an enhanced Taurid period had been detected by radio and visual observers in the closing days of the month, along with an increased flux of minor Taurid fireballs (magnitudes -3 to -8). Another of David's predictions for the swarm was that a recurrence might be expected in October-November 1998, which may well be what was recorded."

References:

[1] D. Asher, "Meteoroid Swarms and the Taurid Complex", in: "Proceedings IMC, Puimichel 1993", ed. P. Roggemans, IMO, 1993, pp.88-91.

[2] A. McBeath, "SPA Meteor Section Results: September-October 1998", WGN, (in press).

[3] G. W. Kronk, "Meteor Showers: A Descriptive Catalog", Enslow, 1988, pp.115-118.

[4] A. McBeath, "The Forward Scatter Meteor Year", in: "Proceedings IMC, Petnica 1997, eds. A. Knoefel & A. McBeath, IMO, 1998, pp.39-54.

James McCanney of the "Millennium Group" suggests that "supernova explosions create the chunks of matter that become the seed comet nuclei and that they come at us from the sites of the old explosion, the fast ones arriving sooner and the slower ones later, but they come from exactly the same location in intergalactic space."

This is interesting. Consider the following:

"In the first year of the period Chih-ho, the fifth moon, the day chi-ch'ou, a guest star appeared approximately several inches southeast of Thien-kuan. After more than a year it gradually became invisible." (Statement of Toktaga and Ouyang Hsuan, fourteenth century Chinese authors of the official history of the Sung dynasty)

"To the Chinese, guest stars were well worth noting and, indeed, looking out for. They believed that humans lived on Earth in a kingdom roofed with stars, and that human destiny was subject to a 'COSMIC WIND.'

"The guest star was also seen and recorded by Japanese astronomers. They noted its appearance 'in the orbit of Orion,' as bright as the planet Jupiter, in early June 1054.

"There are NO European records of this guest star. One of the puzzles about the ancient observations of the supernova of 1054 is the question as to why a new star which was as bright as Venus, visible in daylight for 3 weeks, and visible in the night sky ffor 2 years, should go unrecorded in European annals. Supernovae were neither totally unprecedented nor unknown in historical sources available in Europe.

"One possible explanation that has been advanced for the lack of records of this supernova is that its appearance coincided with the split in Christianity between the Roman Church and the Greek Orthodox... July 16, 1054. This was what was known as the 'Great Schism.' The Church Fathers might have found it expedient to expunge from history such a dramatic portent..." including many other historical documents...

"A medical textbook, Uyun al-Anba, composed by Ibn Abi Usaybia in about AD 1242, contains a statement by Ibn Butlan (a Christian physician from Baghdad, who had lived in Cairo and in Constantinople between 1052 and 1055). Butlan said: ' One of the well-known epidemics of our time is that which occurred when the spectacular star appeared in Gemini in the year 446 AH.' "

The year in question, given in Islamic dates, lasted from April 12, 1054 to April 1, 1055. The reference to Gemini rather than to Taurus can be understood as a reference to the precession of the equinox.

"Thus, the date and position, and the general circumstances of the observation suggest that Butlan was ascribing to the supernova of AD 1054, the cause of a noteworthy plague (which, by his account, spread from Constantinople where 14,000 people perished, to Egypt where it killed most of the population of Cairo, and to Iraq, the Yemen and Syria). Butlan's explanation is in general agreement with the belief that diseases were influences from the stars; the word 'influenza' still preserves this belief in European languages.

"Save for Butlan's aside, there are no other definite western records of the AD 1054 supernova in Euorpe. The records are silent about an event which must have been an astronomical spectacle far outshining such pale rivals as Halley's Comet, which appeared 12 years later and was commemorated in the Bayeux Tapestry." (quoted from "Supernovae," by Paul and Lesley Murdin: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)

The remnant of this supernova of 1054 is called the Crab Nebula. Its distance from earth is about 6500 light years which means that it actually occurred about 7500 BC.

I don't have any idea how long it would take these "cosmic vaccum cleaners" to arrive... how much longer after the visible light arrives would the matter get here, considering that it would be slowed down in space due to accumulation of matter?

And, it seems that the Cassiopaean's are onto something in the above excerpts, because I was reading about the stages of a supernova, and, according to a couple of guys, Stanford Woosley and David Arnett, who independently developed a theory that explains the light curve of a supernova, a supernova originates from a star with a dense core of iron. The core becomes unstable and expodes, releasing a substantial amount of radioactive nickel-56. The radioactive decay of nickel into cobalt-56 and then into stable iron-56 produces gamma rays that illuminate the surrounding gas. This illumination is the primary source of energy that makes the supernova shine.

So, in the clues the Cassiopaean's were giving about comets, it seems that they were pointing somewhat in this direction, that we ought to be watching for something in the way of a cometary shower that we may never have experienced before, that derives from an ancient supernova. Or, on the other hand, one that has a VERY LONG [3,600 years, perhaps?] period of return as stated in many other sessions.

Added August 30, 1999

Session date: August 28, 1999

Keep in mind as you read the following the "Prime Directive" of the Cassiopaeans which is that Free Will cannot be abridged which is what would result if certain things were told to us outright. Also keep in mind their famous tendency to use puns and double and triple entendres.

[...]
Q: (L) There were several dark streaks seen in the sky at the time of the recent solar eclipse. There has been a great deal of comment about this at various sites on the internet including some of the 'hard science' astronomical ones, yet there is no general consensus as to what they were. There were also strange lights and objects seen around the sun, and later, 'things' or 'shadows' reported crossing the surface of the moon. There is also an ongoing discussion about some sort of 'Incoming Object' as though there is an anomalous object in our solar system that is creating this effect. Now, I realize that you said before that we ought to watch for something AFTER Comet Lee, the exact words being ' Now, you need to know the composition of this comet... And any other closely following same. We have alluded to the increased cometary activity before. Oort, and that which cyclically disturbs it.' So, it does seem that what you were alluding to is transpiring at the present. I mean, 'closely following' probably means close in terms of time, also. And you did say that such comets as have been disturbed would approach in a 'scatter pattern,' which would mean from any and all directions. Can you comment on these current events?
A: Not yet.
Q: Why? Is there something we should be watching for?
A: Best to keep watching.... Be open to all possibilities.
Q: Are we on the verge of a) an alien invasion; b) a cometary impact; c) the appearance of a twin sun, a death star in our solar system?
A: Wait and see.
Q: I don't want to wait and see! (A) Wait and see! When it hits us, we will know! (L) Let me ask this....
A: What a glorious transition to 4th density STO. With maybe a quick stopover in 5th just to pick up a few things for the trip!
Q: Are you saying that we are getting ready for the Big Kahuna?
A: Only Don Ho knows for sure.
Q: What?!
A: Well, you did say "Kahuna," yes?
Q: Okay, you have repeatedly, in the past year, alluded to something that we are supposed to be watching for, that we are supposed to 'enjoy the show,' and all that sort of thing. Now you have made this remark about 5th density, where 3rd density goes at death. Are you suggesting that a lot of folks are going to check out?
A: Maybe we were trying to Lighten things up a bit!
Q: That's all fine and good, but I just want one word here, a clue about what is coming down in the near future that you are making all these hints about... just a one word clue?
A: KABOOM!
Q: Now wait a minute! You can't DO that! What do you mean 'kaboom?' I changed my mind, I want two words! One more word!
A: SPLAT!
Q: Okay, a word that applies to us sitting right here....
A: Florida.
Q: We KNOW it's Florida! What about a word that will give me a clue about our location in terms of this 'kaboom' and 'splat' business?
A: Hot.
Q: (A) I guess that means it will be hot here, but safe.
A: Okay. Hot but safe, maybe.
Q: Kaboom and splat? Does that relate to what you said about C____ last year when I asked if she had a plan to fulfill that she was not attending to at present and you said 'Fate will intercede.' When I asked HOW fate was going to intercede, you said 'Do you really want to know?' So, I said that I just wanted a one word clue, and you said: 'CRUNCH.' Is this what we are talking about here? Can we connect these dots?
A: Oh no, she is in the mountains. So of course, she is safe!!!
Q: (A) She is safe because she is in the mountains?
A: Humor, people!
Q: So that is a backward clue?
A: Open. .

And that was all they would say about it! Go figure! But, before getting hysterical, I would like to point out that "kaboom!" and "splat!" could apply equally to a cometary event as well as a major solar flare and CME. After all, CME's are the result of explosions on the sun, and when they impact the Earth, it could be considered a "splat." If, by any chance, the Cassiopaeans are correct, and a dark "companion sun" is sneaking into our solar system, it would account for a number of recent anomalous events. And, this could all tie in with the Velikovskian idea of comets as "cosmic vacuum cleaners," as described by the Millennium Group. A larger comet with EM properties could stimulate unheard of solar activity. Re-read above the funny clues about Comet Lee and if anybody has any insights, e-mail me.

Added October 7, 1999:

After observing all the antics of the rumor mongers on the internet, monitoring all the information sites, scientific, current events oriented, and others, the only thing that can have been construed to have been a "kaboom splat" type event during the period in question was the loss of the Mars probe which did, indeed, go "kaboom! splat!" The ostensible reason for this was claimed to have been a mix-up in measurement conversions from metric to inches. I am not sure if this is a good explanation. Perhaps this probe was acted against in such a way that it went "kaboom!" and then "splat!" on the surface of Mars? Just a thought.

But, of course, "near" in terms of "time" to the Cassiopaeans, can often mean a rather longer period of time than we generally consider as "soon." In my own experience, "soon" as described by them, amounted to three years!

Another point I would like to mention regarding Nostradamus is the following:

Michel de Nostredame, or Nostradamus, one of the most acclaimed of post-Biblical prophets, has been claimed to have had a very good record of "hits." Unfortunately, it is often difficult to determine how good due to the obscurity of his prophetic style. It is usually after the fact that his quatrains are discovered to be "incredibly accurate." And, the same quatrains have been discovered to be "incredibly accurate" for DIFFERENT EVENTS by different analysts!

So, we have to be very careful about getting ourselves all in an uproar about such things. The Cassiopaeans have remarked about the impossibility of accurate prediction due to the "fluid nature" of the Universe and have even said:

01-07-96
Q: (P) I would like to know about the apparitions of the Virgin Mary at Conyers, GA, as well as this book "Mary's Message to the World" and all the other messages about the End Times that are coming out all over?
A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of prophetic and philosophical patternings and usually shift course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.

Nevertheless, taking the above into consideration, if, as is claimed, Nostradamus was a Jew, might he not have been referring to a Jewish reckoning of months when he spoke about the "Seventh Month?" In such a case, what month would that be? Certainly not the modern Western July or even September... just a thought. If anyone knows what month this might be, let me know.

Let me emphasize again that we don't need to get hysterical about any of it. There is so much in the way of lies and disinformation raging through the internet, the media, and in our world in general, that it does none of us any good to get excited about what is going on around us. We all need to keep a cool head and watch what is going on around us. If the "negative forces" do, in fact, feed on fear and panic, they have been on a veritable feeding frenzy in the past few months!

 

Continue to: Comets, Twin Sun, Armageddon?

 


FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here that is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication is offered with the caveat that the reader ought always to research on their own. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Cassiopaean materials Copyright 1994-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

 

You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: Could Not Write to File _cass_earth2_htm].